Episiotomy versus fetal manipulation in managing severe shoulder dystocia

A comparison of outcomes

Edith D. Gurewitsch Allen, Michele Donithan, Shawn P. Stallings, Patricia L. Moore, Shefali Agarwal, Leora M. Allen, Robert H. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In severe shoulder dystocia, when initial maneuvers fail, either episiotomy or fetal manipulation (Rubin, Woods' screw, or posterior arm release) is recommended. We sought to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between severe shoulder dystocia deliveries managed with episiotomy versus fetal manipulation. We identified severe shoulder dystocia deliveries from three databases: all shoulder dystocia deliveries (1993-2003 and 1994-1997) from two teaching institutions and litigated cases of shoulder dystocia-associated permanent brachial plexus palsy from multiple U.S. institutions. Pair-wise comparisons were made among three groups of deliveries: those managed by fetal manipulation without episiotomy (fetal manipulation-only), those managed by episiotomy without fetal manipulation (episiotomy-only), and those managed with both (episiotomy + fetal manipulation). Rates of brachial plexus palsy, neonatal depression, and anal sphincter trauma were compared among groups using χ2, with significance at P <. 05. Among episiotomy-only, 13 of 22 (59.1%) sustained brachial plexus palsy, compared with 20 of 57 (35.1%) among fetal manipulation-only (P =. 05). Twenty-eight of 48 (58.3%) in episiotomy + fetal manipulation had brachial plexus palsy, which did not differ from episiotomy-only (P =. 95) but was higher than fetal manipulation-only (P =. 02), suggesting that the addition of episiotomy conferred no benefit in averting neonatal injury. Anal sphincter trauma was significantly more common among episiotomy-only and episiotomy + fetal manipulation, compared with fetal manipulation-only. In severe shoulder dystocia, if fetal manipulation can be performed without episiotomy, severe perineal trauma can be averted without incurring greater risk of brachial plexus palsy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)911-916
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume191
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Episiotomy
Dystocia
Brachial Plexus
Paralysis
Wounds and Injuries
Anal Canal

Keywords

  • Brachial plexus palsy
  • Episiotomy
  • Maneuvers
  • Perineal trauma
  • Shoulder dystocia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Episiotomy versus fetal manipulation in managing severe shoulder dystocia : A comparison of outcomes. / Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D.; Donithan, Michele; Stallings, Shawn P.; Moore, Patricia L.; Agarwal, Shefali; Allen, Leora M.; Allen, Robert H.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 191, No. 3, 01.09.2004, p. 911-916.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D. ; Donithan, Michele ; Stallings, Shawn P. ; Moore, Patricia L. ; Agarwal, Shefali ; Allen, Leora M. ; Allen, Robert H. / Episiotomy versus fetal manipulation in managing severe shoulder dystocia : A comparison of outcomes. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004 ; Vol. 191, No. 3. pp. 911-916.
@article{0203a5bd773e41588b2d55f3e30c4e29,
title = "Episiotomy versus fetal manipulation in managing severe shoulder dystocia: A comparison of outcomes",
abstract = "In severe shoulder dystocia, when initial maneuvers fail, either episiotomy or fetal manipulation (Rubin, Woods' screw, or posterior arm release) is recommended. We sought to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between severe shoulder dystocia deliveries managed with episiotomy versus fetal manipulation. We identified severe shoulder dystocia deliveries from three databases: all shoulder dystocia deliveries (1993-2003 and 1994-1997) from two teaching institutions and litigated cases of shoulder dystocia-associated permanent brachial plexus palsy from multiple U.S. institutions. Pair-wise comparisons were made among three groups of deliveries: those managed by fetal manipulation without episiotomy (fetal manipulation-only), those managed by episiotomy without fetal manipulation (episiotomy-only), and those managed with both (episiotomy + fetal manipulation). Rates of brachial plexus palsy, neonatal depression, and anal sphincter trauma were compared among groups using χ2, with significance at P <. 05. Among episiotomy-only, 13 of 22 (59.1{\%}) sustained brachial plexus palsy, compared with 20 of 57 (35.1{\%}) among fetal manipulation-only (P =. 05). Twenty-eight of 48 (58.3{\%}) in episiotomy + fetal manipulation had brachial plexus palsy, which did not differ from episiotomy-only (P =. 95) but was higher than fetal manipulation-only (P =. 02), suggesting that the addition of episiotomy conferred no benefit in averting neonatal injury. Anal sphincter trauma was significantly more common among episiotomy-only and episiotomy + fetal manipulation, compared with fetal manipulation-only. In severe shoulder dystocia, if fetal manipulation can be performed without episiotomy, severe perineal trauma can be averted without incurring greater risk of brachial plexus palsy.",
keywords = "Brachial plexus palsy, Episiotomy, Maneuvers, Perineal trauma, Shoulder dystocia",
author = "{Gurewitsch Allen}, {Edith D.} and Michele Donithan and Stallings, {Shawn P.} and Moore, {Patricia L.} and Shefali Agarwal and Allen, {Leora M.} and Allen, {Robert H.}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "191",
pages = "911--916",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Episiotomy versus fetal manipulation in managing severe shoulder dystocia

T2 - A comparison of outcomes

AU - Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D.

AU - Donithan, Michele

AU - Stallings, Shawn P.

AU - Moore, Patricia L.

AU - Agarwal, Shefali

AU - Allen, Leora M.

AU - Allen, Robert H.

PY - 2004/9/1

Y1 - 2004/9/1

N2 - In severe shoulder dystocia, when initial maneuvers fail, either episiotomy or fetal manipulation (Rubin, Woods' screw, or posterior arm release) is recommended. We sought to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between severe shoulder dystocia deliveries managed with episiotomy versus fetal manipulation. We identified severe shoulder dystocia deliveries from three databases: all shoulder dystocia deliveries (1993-2003 and 1994-1997) from two teaching institutions and litigated cases of shoulder dystocia-associated permanent brachial plexus palsy from multiple U.S. institutions. Pair-wise comparisons were made among three groups of deliveries: those managed by fetal manipulation without episiotomy (fetal manipulation-only), those managed by episiotomy without fetal manipulation (episiotomy-only), and those managed with both (episiotomy + fetal manipulation). Rates of brachial plexus palsy, neonatal depression, and anal sphincter trauma were compared among groups using χ2, with significance at P <. 05. Among episiotomy-only, 13 of 22 (59.1%) sustained brachial plexus palsy, compared with 20 of 57 (35.1%) among fetal manipulation-only (P =. 05). Twenty-eight of 48 (58.3%) in episiotomy + fetal manipulation had brachial plexus palsy, which did not differ from episiotomy-only (P =. 95) but was higher than fetal manipulation-only (P =. 02), suggesting that the addition of episiotomy conferred no benefit in averting neonatal injury. Anal sphincter trauma was significantly more common among episiotomy-only and episiotomy + fetal manipulation, compared with fetal manipulation-only. In severe shoulder dystocia, if fetal manipulation can be performed without episiotomy, severe perineal trauma can be averted without incurring greater risk of brachial plexus palsy.

AB - In severe shoulder dystocia, when initial maneuvers fail, either episiotomy or fetal manipulation (Rubin, Woods' screw, or posterior arm release) is recommended. We sought to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between severe shoulder dystocia deliveries managed with episiotomy versus fetal manipulation. We identified severe shoulder dystocia deliveries from three databases: all shoulder dystocia deliveries (1993-2003 and 1994-1997) from two teaching institutions and litigated cases of shoulder dystocia-associated permanent brachial plexus palsy from multiple U.S. institutions. Pair-wise comparisons were made among three groups of deliveries: those managed by fetal manipulation without episiotomy (fetal manipulation-only), those managed by episiotomy without fetal manipulation (episiotomy-only), and those managed with both (episiotomy + fetal manipulation). Rates of brachial plexus palsy, neonatal depression, and anal sphincter trauma were compared among groups using χ2, with significance at P <. 05. Among episiotomy-only, 13 of 22 (59.1%) sustained brachial plexus palsy, compared with 20 of 57 (35.1%) among fetal manipulation-only (P =. 05). Twenty-eight of 48 (58.3%) in episiotomy + fetal manipulation had brachial plexus palsy, which did not differ from episiotomy-only (P =. 95) but was higher than fetal manipulation-only (P =. 02), suggesting that the addition of episiotomy conferred no benefit in averting neonatal injury. Anal sphincter trauma was significantly more common among episiotomy-only and episiotomy + fetal manipulation, compared with fetal manipulation-only. In severe shoulder dystocia, if fetal manipulation can be performed without episiotomy, severe perineal trauma can be averted without incurring greater risk of brachial plexus palsy.

KW - Brachial plexus palsy

KW - Episiotomy

KW - Maneuvers

KW - Perineal trauma

KW - Shoulder dystocia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4644244004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4644244004&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.041

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.041

M3 - Article

VL - 191

SP - 911

EP - 916

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 3

ER -