Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block

Siu Fai Li, Philip L. Walden, Oscar Marcilla, E. John Gallagher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective: To validate ECG criteria previously proposed by Sgarbossa et al for the detection of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and suspected ischemia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at an urban teaching hospital. All patients admitted with suspected ischemia and LBBB were eligible. MI was defined as an elevated creatine kinase (CK) isoenzyme MB (>14 IU/L) that was at least 5% of total CK level. ECGs were interpreted by 2 physicians blinded to patient outcome. Interpreters were asked to rate ECGs for the presence of each of the 3 criteria proposed by Sgarbossa et al: (1) ST-segment elevation greater than or equal to 1 mm concordant with the QRS complex; (2) ST-segment elevation greater than or equal to 5 mm discordant with the QRS complex; and (3) ST-segment depression in leads V1 through V3. Interobserver agreement was assessed. Results: Of 190 eligible patients, 25 (13%) had MI. Sensitivities of the 3 criteria varied from 0 to 16%, with specificities of 93% to 100%. Only the first criterion demonstrated a clinically useful likelihood ratio (positive likelihood ratio=16 [95% confidence interval 4 to >100]). Patients with new LBBB were more likely to have MI (relative risk=5.1 [95% confidence interval 2.6 to 10]). Interobserver agreement among ECG interpreters ranged from 93% to 98%. Conclusion: The criteria of Sgarbossa et al cannot be used to exclude MI in patients with LBBB because of low sensitivities and poor negative likelihood ratios. ST-segment elevation concordant with the QRS complex had a high positive likelihood ratio for identification of MI. Patients with new LBBB and suspected ischemia are 5 times more likely to have MI than patients with LBBB of chronic or unknown duration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)561-565
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume36
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Bundle-Branch Block
Myocardial Infarction
Electrocardiography
Ischemia
Confidence Intervals
MB Form Creatine Kinase
Urban Hospitals
Creatine Kinase
Teaching Hospitals
Isoenzymes
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block. / Li, Siu Fai; Walden, Philip L.; Marcilla, Oscar; Gallagher, E. John.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2000, p. 561-565.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2f00b0a288e94ec2907e45454521599d,
title = "Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block",
abstract = "Study objective: To validate ECG criteria previously proposed by Sgarbossa et al for the detection of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and suspected ischemia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at an urban teaching hospital. All patients admitted with suspected ischemia and LBBB were eligible. MI was defined as an elevated creatine kinase (CK) isoenzyme MB (>14 IU/L) that was at least 5{\%} of total CK level. ECGs were interpreted by 2 physicians blinded to patient outcome. Interpreters were asked to rate ECGs for the presence of each of the 3 criteria proposed by Sgarbossa et al: (1) ST-segment elevation greater than or equal to 1 mm concordant with the QRS complex; (2) ST-segment elevation greater than or equal to 5 mm discordant with the QRS complex; and (3) ST-segment depression in leads V1 through V3. Interobserver agreement was assessed. Results: Of 190 eligible patients, 25 (13{\%}) had MI. Sensitivities of the 3 criteria varied from 0 to 16{\%}, with specificities of 93{\%} to 100{\%}. Only the first criterion demonstrated a clinically useful likelihood ratio (positive likelihood ratio=16 [95{\%} confidence interval 4 to >100]). Patients with new LBBB were more likely to have MI (relative risk=5.1 [95{\%} confidence interval 2.6 to 10]). Interobserver agreement among ECG interpreters ranged from 93{\%} to 98{\%}. Conclusion: The criteria of Sgarbossa et al cannot be used to exclude MI in patients with LBBB because of low sensitivities and poor negative likelihood ratios. ST-segment elevation concordant with the QRS complex had a high positive likelihood ratio for identification of MI. Patients with new LBBB and suspected ischemia are 5 times more likely to have MI than patients with LBBB of chronic or unknown duration.",
author = "Li, {Siu Fai} and Walden, {Philip L.} and Oscar Marcilla and Gallagher, {E. John}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "561--565",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block

AU - Li, Siu Fai

AU - Walden, Philip L.

AU - Marcilla, Oscar

AU - Gallagher, E. John

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Study objective: To validate ECG criteria previously proposed by Sgarbossa et al for the detection of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and suspected ischemia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at an urban teaching hospital. All patients admitted with suspected ischemia and LBBB were eligible. MI was defined as an elevated creatine kinase (CK) isoenzyme MB (>14 IU/L) that was at least 5% of total CK level. ECGs were interpreted by 2 physicians blinded to patient outcome. Interpreters were asked to rate ECGs for the presence of each of the 3 criteria proposed by Sgarbossa et al: (1) ST-segment elevation greater than or equal to 1 mm concordant with the QRS complex; (2) ST-segment elevation greater than or equal to 5 mm discordant with the QRS complex; and (3) ST-segment depression in leads V1 through V3. Interobserver agreement was assessed. Results: Of 190 eligible patients, 25 (13%) had MI. Sensitivities of the 3 criteria varied from 0 to 16%, with specificities of 93% to 100%. Only the first criterion demonstrated a clinically useful likelihood ratio (positive likelihood ratio=16 [95% confidence interval 4 to >100]). Patients with new LBBB were more likely to have MI (relative risk=5.1 [95% confidence interval 2.6 to 10]). Interobserver agreement among ECG interpreters ranged from 93% to 98%. Conclusion: The criteria of Sgarbossa et al cannot be used to exclude MI in patients with LBBB because of low sensitivities and poor negative likelihood ratios. ST-segment elevation concordant with the QRS complex had a high positive likelihood ratio for identification of MI. Patients with new LBBB and suspected ischemia are 5 times more likely to have MI than patients with LBBB of chronic or unknown duration.

AB - Study objective: To validate ECG criteria previously proposed by Sgarbossa et al for the detection of myocardial infarction (MI) in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and suspected ischemia. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed at an urban teaching hospital. All patients admitted with suspected ischemia and LBBB were eligible. MI was defined as an elevated creatine kinase (CK) isoenzyme MB (>14 IU/L) that was at least 5% of total CK level. ECGs were interpreted by 2 physicians blinded to patient outcome. Interpreters were asked to rate ECGs for the presence of each of the 3 criteria proposed by Sgarbossa et al: (1) ST-segment elevation greater than or equal to 1 mm concordant with the QRS complex; (2) ST-segment elevation greater than or equal to 5 mm discordant with the QRS complex; and (3) ST-segment depression in leads V1 through V3. Interobserver agreement was assessed. Results: Of 190 eligible patients, 25 (13%) had MI. Sensitivities of the 3 criteria varied from 0 to 16%, with specificities of 93% to 100%. Only the first criterion demonstrated a clinically useful likelihood ratio (positive likelihood ratio=16 [95% confidence interval 4 to >100]). Patients with new LBBB were more likely to have MI (relative risk=5.1 [95% confidence interval 2.6 to 10]). Interobserver agreement among ECG interpreters ranged from 93% to 98%. Conclusion: The criteria of Sgarbossa et al cannot be used to exclude MI in patients with LBBB because of low sensitivities and poor negative likelihood ratios. ST-segment elevation concordant with the QRS complex had a high positive likelihood ratio for identification of MI. Patients with new LBBB and suspected ischemia are 5 times more likely to have MI than patients with LBBB of chronic or unknown duration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033673346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033673346&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11097695

AN - SCOPUS:0033673346

VL - 36

SP - 561

EP - 565

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 6

ER -