Effects of electron-beam irradiation on buccal-cell DNA

Philip E. Castle, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Tracie Franklin, Stephen Chanock, Vinita Puri, Robert Welch, Nathaniel Rothman, Jim Vaught

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Buccal cells were collected from 29 participants, by use of mouthwash rinses, and were split into equal aliquots, with one aliquot irradiated by electron-beam (E-beam) irradiation equivalent to the sterilizing dosage used by the U.S. Postal Service and the other left untreated. Aliquots were extracted and tested for DNA yields (e.g., TaqMan assay for quantifying human genomic DNA), genomic integrity, and amplification-based analysis of genetic variants (e.g., single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] and single tandem repeats [STRs]). Irradiated aliquots had lower median DNA yields (3.7 μg/aliquot) than untreated aliquots (7.6 μg/aliquot) (P < .0005) and were more likely to have smaller maximum DNA fragment size, on the basis of genomic integrity gels, than untreated aliquots (P < .0005). Irradiated aliquots showed poorer PCR amplification of a 989-bp β-globin target (97% for weak amplification and 3% for no amplification) than untreated aliquots (7% for weak amplification and 0% for no amplification) (P < .0005), but 536-bp and 268-bp β-globin targets were amplified from all aliquots. There was no detectable irradiation effect on SNP assays, but there was a significant trend for decreased detection of longer STRs (P = .01) in irradiated versus untreated aliquots. We conclude that E-beam irradiation reduced the yield and quality of buccal-cell specimens, and, although irradiated buccal-cell specimens may retain sufficient DNA integrity for some amplified analyses of many common genomic targets, assays that target longer DNA fragments (>989 bp) or require whole-genome amplification may be compromised.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)646-651
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Human Genetics
Volume73
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cheek
Electrons
DNA
Mouthwashes
Tandem Repeat Sequences
Postal Service
Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
Genome

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics

Cite this

Castle, P. E., Garcia-Closas, M., Franklin, T., Chanock, S., Puri, V., Welch, R., ... Vaught, J. (2003). Effects of electron-beam irradiation on buccal-cell DNA. American Journal of Human Genetics, 73(3), 646-651. https://doi.org/10.1086/378077

Effects of electron-beam irradiation on buccal-cell DNA. / Castle, Philip E.; Garcia-Closas, Montserrat; Franklin, Tracie; Chanock, Stephen; Puri, Vinita; Welch, Robert; Rothman, Nathaniel; Vaught, Jim.

In: American Journal of Human Genetics, Vol. 73, No. 3, 01.09.2003, p. 646-651.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Castle, PE, Garcia-Closas, M, Franklin, T, Chanock, S, Puri, V, Welch, R, Rothman, N & Vaught, J 2003, 'Effects of electron-beam irradiation on buccal-cell DNA', American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 646-651. https://doi.org/10.1086/378077
Castle PE, Garcia-Closas M, Franklin T, Chanock S, Puri V, Welch R et al. Effects of electron-beam irradiation on buccal-cell DNA. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2003 Sep 1;73(3):646-651. https://doi.org/10.1086/378077
Castle, Philip E. ; Garcia-Closas, Montserrat ; Franklin, Tracie ; Chanock, Stephen ; Puri, Vinita ; Welch, Robert ; Rothman, Nathaniel ; Vaught, Jim. / Effects of electron-beam irradiation on buccal-cell DNA. In: American Journal of Human Genetics. 2003 ; Vol. 73, No. 3. pp. 646-651.
@article{3ac699f6c57c424999dcf0f37c876399,
title = "Effects of electron-beam irradiation on buccal-cell DNA",
abstract = "Buccal cells were collected from 29 participants, by use of mouthwash rinses, and were split into equal aliquots, with one aliquot irradiated by electron-beam (E-beam) irradiation equivalent to the sterilizing dosage used by the U.S. Postal Service and the other left untreated. Aliquots were extracted and tested for DNA yields (e.g., TaqMan assay for quantifying human genomic DNA), genomic integrity, and amplification-based analysis of genetic variants (e.g., single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] and single tandem repeats [STRs]). Irradiated aliquots had lower median DNA yields (3.7 μg/aliquot) than untreated aliquots (7.6 μg/aliquot) (P < .0005) and were more likely to have smaller maximum DNA fragment size, on the basis of genomic integrity gels, than untreated aliquots (P < .0005). Irradiated aliquots showed poorer PCR amplification of a 989-bp β-globin target (97{\%} for weak amplification and 3{\%} for no amplification) than untreated aliquots (7{\%} for weak amplification and 0{\%} for no amplification) (P < .0005), but 536-bp and 268-bp β-globin targets were amplified from all aliquots. There was no detectable irradiation effect on SNP assays, but there was a significant trend for decreased detection of longer STRs (P = .01) in irradiated versus untreated aliquots. We conclude that E-beam irradiation reduced the yield and quality of buccal-cell specimens, and, although irradiated buccal-cell specimens may retain sufficient DNA integrity for some amplified analyses of many common genomic targets, assays that target longer DNA fragments (>989 bp) or require whole-genome amplification may be compromised.",
author = "Castle, {Philip E.} and Montserrat Garcia-Closas and Tracie Franklin and Stephen Chanock and Vinita Puri and Robert Welch and Nathaniel Rothman and Jim Vaught",
year = "2003",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/378077",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "73",
pages = "646--651",
journal = "American Journal of Human Genetics",
issn = "0002-9297",
publisher = "Cell Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of electron-beam irradiation on buccal-cell DNA

AU - Castle, Philip E.

AU - Garcia-Closas, Montserrat

AU - Franklin, Tracie

AU - Chanock, Stephen

AU - Puri, Vinita

AU - Welch, Robert

AU - Rothman, Nathaniel

AU - Vaught, Jim

PY - 2003/9/1

Y1 - 2003/9/1

N2 - Buccal cells were collected from 29 participants, by use of mouthwash rinses, and were split into equal aliquots, with one aliquot irradiated by electron-beam (E-beam) irradiation equivalent to the sterilizing dosage used by the U.S. Postal Service and the other left untreated. Aliquots were extracted and tested for DNA yields (e.g., TaqMan assay for quantifying human genomic DNA), genomic integrity, and amplification-based analysis of genetic variants (e.g., single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] and single tandem repeats [STRs]). Irradiated aliquots had lower median DNA yields (3.7 μg/aliquot) than untreated aliquots (7.6 μg/aliquot) (P < .0005) and were more likely to have smaller maximum DNA fragment size, on the basis of genomic integrity gels, than untreated aliquots (P < .0005). Irradiated aliquots showed poorer PCR amplification of a 989-bp β-globin target (97% for weak amplification and 3% for no amplification) than untreated aliquots (7% for weak amplification and 0% for no amplification) (P < .0005), but 536-bp and 268-bp β-globin targets were amplified from all aliquots. There was no detectable irradiation effect on SNP assays, but there was a significant trend for decreased detection of longer STRs (P = .01) in irradiated versus untreated aliquots. We conclude that E-beam irradiation reduced the yield and quality of buccal-cell specimens, and, although irradiated buccal-cell specimens may retain sufficient DNA integrity for some amplified analyses of many common genomic targets, assays that target longer DNA fragments (>989 bp) or require whole-genome amplification may be compromised.

AB - Buccal cells were collected from 29 participants, by use of mouthwash rinses, and were split into equal aliquots, with one aliquot irradiated by electron-beam (E-beam) irradiation equivalent to the sterilizing dosage used by the U.S. Postal Service and the other left untreated. Aliquots were extracted and tested for DNA yields (e.g., TaqMan assay for quantifying human genomic DNA), genomic integrity, and amplification-based analysis of genetic variants (e.g., single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] and single tandem repeats [STRs]). Irradiated aliquots had lower median DNA yields (3.7 μg/aliquot) than untreated aliquots (7.6 μg/aliquot) (P < .0005) and were more likely to have smaller maximum DNA fragment size, on the basis of genomic integrity gels, than untreated aliquots (P < .0005). Irradiated aliquots showed poorer PCR amplification of a 989-bp β-globin target (97% for weak amplification and 3% for no amplification) than untreated aliquots (7% for weak amplification and 0% for no amplification) (P < .0005), but 536-bp and 268-bp β-globin targets were amplified from all aliquots. There was no detectable irradiation effect on SNP assays, but there was a significant trend for decreased detection of longer STRs (P = .01) in irradiated versus untreated aliquots. We conclude that E-beam irradiation reduced the yield and quality of buccal-cell specimens, and, although irradiated buccal-cell specimens may retain sufficient DNA integrity for some amplified analyses of many common genomic targets, assays that target longer DNA fragments (>989 bp) or require whole-genome amplification may be compromised.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042387706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042387706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/378077

DO - 10.1086/378077

M3 - Article

C2 - 12917795

AN - SCOPUS:0042387706

VL - 73

SP - 646

EP - 651

JO - American Journal of Human Genetics

JF - American Journal of Human Genetics

SN - 0002-9297

IS - 3

ER -