Direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) prescribing practices of members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology

Lauren R. Scanlon, Bijan Khaksari, Sanjay Goel, Nicole S. Nevadunsky, Jason D. Wright, Gregory M. Gressel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Cancer associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as alternatives to injectable medications for both thromboprophylaxis and treatment of VTE. Several recent clinical trials have demonstrated safety and efficacy of DOACs in high risk patients receiving systemic chemotherapy as well as postoperative prophylaxis after surgery for gynecologic cancer. Major consensus guidelines from multiple organizations support the use of DOACs for these indications but prescription practices are not well characterized. Methods: A survey study was sent concurrently to members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Research Survey Pool between May and June of 2021. The study was designed to assess DOAC prescription practices amongst members of these societies who routinely prescribe chemotherapy. Bivariate analyses comparing responses from ASCO participants and SGO participants were compared using chi-squared and Fisher exact tests. Results: A total of 103 physicians were included in the ASCO group and 139 in the SGO group. A majority of participants in both groups reported familiarity with prescribing DOACs (99% of ASCO and 96% of SGO respondents). ASCO respondents were more likely to consider DOACs as first line therapy for treatment of cancer-associated VTE than SGO members (82% vs 63%, p < 0.01) and SGO members were more likely to consider low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) the standard of care treatment (66% vs 25% p < 0.01). Most respondents in both groups (75%) felt DOACs were equally safe and effective compared to LMWH but more ASCO members felt DOACs were cost effective (70% vs 49%, p < 0.01). More SGO respondents reported having prescribed prophylactic anticoagulation during chemotherapy than ASCO members (53% vs 35%, p < 0.01). Conclusion: ASCO respondents were more likely to prescribe DOACs for both treatment and prophylaxis of cancer-associated VTE than SGO members. However, SGO members were more likely to prescribe prophylactic anticoagulation to high risk patients initiating chemotherapy compared to ASCO members.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)68-73
Number of pages6
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume173
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Anticoagulation
  • DOAC
  • Malignancy
  • Venous-thromboembolism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) prescribing practices of members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology and American Society of Clinical Oncology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this