Diagnostic concordance for DSM-IV sleep disorders

A report from the APA/NIMH DSM-IV field trial

Daniel J. Buysse, Charles F. Reynolds, Peter J. Hauri, Thomas Roth, Edward J. Stepanski, Michael J. Thorpy, Edward O. Bixler, Anthony Kales, Rocco L. Manfredi, Alexandros N. Vgontzas, Deborah M. Stapf, Patricia R. Houck, David J. Kupfer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

106 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The frequency and ranking of DSM-IV sleep disorder diagnoses of clinical patients with complaints of insomnia, as well as rates of diagnostic agreement and disagreement between two types of interviewers, were investigated. Methods: Interviewers at five clinical sites assessed 216 patients referred for insomnia complaints. One sleep specialist and one general clinician interviewed each patient in an unstructured clinical interview, assigned DSM-IV diagnoses, and indicated their reactions to the diagnostic system. Results: Insomnia due to another mental disorder was the most frequent DSM-IV diagnosis across sites, followed by primary insomnia. Interviewers at the five sites differed significantly in the rankings they assigned to different diagnoses. In addition, sleep specialists at most sites diagnosed psychiatric forms of insomnia more frequently than nonspecialists. Kappa values for agreement between the two types of clinicians on multiple DSM-IV sleep diagnoses ranged from 0.26 to 0.80 across sites, indicating moderate agreement overall. Kappa values for individual diagnoses varied across sites and specific diagnoses and ranged from poor to excellent. Interviewers' ratings of their confidence in diagnoses and the fit and ease of use of the DSM-IV categories also showed significant variability related to site and type of interviewer. Conclusions: The distribution of diagnoses highlights the importance of psychiatric and behavioral factors in the assessment of insomnia. Site-related variability indicates a need for greater standardization in the application of sleep disorder diagnostic criteria. Diagnostic concordance for these diagnoses, while only moderately good, likely reflects actual clinical practice and would be improved through the use of standardized (or structured) interviews and increased training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1351-1360
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
Volume151
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
Interviews
Sleep
Psychiatry
Sleep Wake Disorders
Mental Disorders

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F., Hauri, P. J., Roth, T., Stepanski, E. J., Thorpy, M. J., ... Kupfer, D. J. (1994). Diagnostic concordance for DSM-IV sleep disorders: A report from the APA/NIMH DSM-IV field trial. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151(9), 1351-1360.

Diagnostic concordance for DSM-IV sleep disorders : A report from the APA/NIMH DSM-IV field trial. / Buysse, Daniel J.; Reynolds, Charles F.; Hauri, Peter J.; Roth, Thomas; Stepanski, Edward J.; Thorpy, Michael J.; Bixler, Edward O.; Kales, Anthony; Manfredi, Rocco L.; Vgontzas, Alexandros N.; Stapf, Deborah M.; Houck, Patricia R.; Kupfer, David J.

In: American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 151, No. 9, 09.1994, p. 1351-1360.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buysse, DJ, Reynolds, CF, Hauri, PJ, Roth, T, Stepanski, EJ, Thorpy, MJ, Bixler, EO, Kales, A, Manfredi, RL, Vgontzas, AN, Stapf, DM, Houck, PR & Kupfer, DJ 1994, 'Diagnostic concordance for DSM-IV sleep disorders: A report from the APA/NIMH DSM-IV field trial', American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 151, no. 9, pp. 1351-1360.
Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Hauri PJ, Roth T, Stepanski EJ, Thorpy MJ et al. Diagnostic concordance for DSM-IV sleep disorders: A report from the APA/NIMH DSM-IV field trial. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1994 Sep;151(9):1351-1360.
Buysse, Daniel J. ; Reynolds, Charles F. ; Hauri, Peter J. ; Roth, Thomas ; Stepanski, Edward J. ; Thorpy, Michael J. ; Bixler, Edward O. ; Kales, Anthony ; Manfredi, Rocco L. ; Vgontzas, Alexandros N. ; Stapf, Deborah M. ; Houck, Patricia R. ; Kupfer, David J. / Diagnostic concordance for DSM-IV sleep disorders : A report from the APA/NIMH DSM-IV field trial. In: American Journal of Psychiatry. 1994 ; Vol. 151, No. 9. pp. 1351-1360.
@article{674603497dac4f65b8cf0b6344084bf2,
title = "Diagnostic concordance for DSM-IV sleep disorders: A report from the APA/NIMH DSM-IV field trial",
abstract = "Objective: The frequency and ranking of DSM-IV sleep disorder diagnoses of clinical patients with complaints of insomnia, as well as rates of diagnostic agreement and disagreement between two types of interviewers, were investigated. Methods: Interviewers at five clinical sites assessed 216 patients referred for insomnia complaints. One sleep specialist and one general clinician interviewed each patient in an unstructured clinical interview, assigned DSM-IV diagnoses, and indicated their reactions to the diagnostic system. Results: Insomnia due to another mental disorder was the most frequent DSM-IV diagnosis across sites, followed by primary insomnia. Interviewers at the five sites differed significantly in the rankings they assigned to different diagnoses. In addition, sleep specialists at most sites diagnosed psychiatric forms of insomnia more frequently than nonspecialists. Kappa values for agreement between the two types of clinicians on multiple DSM-IV sleep diagnoses ranged from 0.26 to 0.80 across sites, indicating moderate agreement overall. Kappa values for individual diagnoses varied across sites and specific diagnoses and ranged from poor to excellent. Interviewers' ratings of their confidence in diagnoses and the fit and ease of use of the DSM-IV categories also showed significant variability related to site and type of interviewer. Conclusions: The distribution of diagnoses highlights the importance of psychiatric and behavioral factors in the assessment of insomnia. Site-related variability indicates a need for greater standardization in the application of sleep disorder diagnostic criteria. Diagnostic concordance for these diagnoses, while only moderately good, likely reflects actual clinical practice and would be improved through the use of standardized (or structured) interviews and increased training.",
author = "Buysse, {Daniel J.} and Reynolds, {Charles F.} and Hauri, {Peter J.} and Thomas Roth and Stepanski, {Edward J.} and Thorpy, {Michael J.} and Bixler, {Edward O.} and Anthony Kales and Manfredi, {Rocco L.} and Vgontzas, {Alexandros N.} and Stapf, {Deborah M.} and Houck, {Patricia R.} and Kupfer, {David J.}",
year = "1994",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "151",
pages = "1351--1360",
journal = "American Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0002-953X",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic concordance for DSM-IV sleep disorders

T2 - A report from the APA/NIMH DSM-IV field trial

AU - Buysse, Daniel J.

AU - Reynolds, Charles F.

AU - Hauri, Peter J.

AU - Roth, Thomas

AU - Stepanski, Edward J.

AU - Thorpy, Michael J.

AU - Bixler, Edward O.

AU - Kales, Anthony

AU - Manfredi, Rocco L.

AU - Vgontzas, Alexandros N.

AU - Stapf, Deborah M.

AU - Houck, Patricia R.

AU - Kupfer, David J.

PY - 1994/9

Y1 - 1994/9

N2 - Objective: The frequency and ranking of DSM-IV sleep disorder diagnoses of clinical patients with complaints of insomnia, as well as rates of diagnostic agreement and disagreement between two types of interviewers, were investigated. Methods: Interviewers at five clinical sites assessed 216 patients referred for insomnia complaints. One sleep specialist and one general clinician interviewed each patient in an unstructured clinical interview, assigned DSM-IV diagnoses, and indicated their reactions to the diagnostic system. Results: Insomnia due to another mental disorder was the most frequent DSM-IV diagnosis across sites, followed by primary insomnia. Interviewers at the five sites differed significantly in the rankings they assigned to different diagnoses. In addition, sleep specialists at most sites diagnosed psychiatric forms of insomnia more frequently than nonspecialists. Kappa values for agreement between the two types of clinicians on multiple DSM-IV sleep diagnoses ranged from 0.26 to 0.80 across sites, indicating moderate agreement overall. Kappa values for individual diagnoses varied across sites and specific diagnoses and ranged from poor to excellent. Interviewers' ratings of their confidence in diagnoses and the fit and ease of use of the DSM-IV categories also showed significant variability related to site and type of interviewer. Conclusions: The distribution of diagnoses highlights the importance of psychiatric and behavioral factors in the assessment of insomnia. Site-related variability indicates a need for greater standardization in the application of sleep disorder diagnostic criteria. Diagnostic concordance for these diagnoses, while only moderately good, likely reflects actual clinical practice and would be improved through the use of standardized (or structured) interviews and increased training.

AB - Objective: The frequency and ranking of DSM-IV sleep disorder diagnoses of clinical patients with complaints of insomnia, as well as rates of diagnostic agreement and disagreement between two types of interviewers, were investigated. Methods: Interviewers at five clinical sites assessed 216 patients referred for insomnia complaints. One sleep specialist and one general clinician interviewed each patient in an unstructured clinical interview, assigned DSM-IV diagnoses, and indicated their reactions to the diagnostic system. Results: Insomnia due to another mental disorder was the most frequent DSM-IV diagnosis across sites, followed by primary insomnia. Interviewers at the five sites differed significantly in the rankings they assigned to different diagnoses. In addition, sleep specialists at most sites diagnosed psychiatric forms of insomnia more frequently than nonspecialists. Kappa values for agreement between the two types of clinicians on multiple DSM-IV sleep diagnoses ranged from 0.26 to 0.80 across sites, indicating moderate agreement overall. Kappa values for individual diagnoses varied across sites and specific diagnoses and ranged from poor to excellent. Interviewers' ratings of their confidence in diagnoses and the fit and ease of use of the DSM-IV categories also showed significant variability related to site and type of interviewer. Conclusions: The distribution of diagnoses highlights the importance of psychiatric and behavioral factors in the assessment of insomnia. Site-related variability indicates a need for greater standardization in the application of sleep disorder diagnostic criteria. Diagnostic concordance for these diagnoses, while only moderately good, likely reflects actual clinical practice and would be improved through the use of standardized (or structured) interviews and increased training.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027930175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027930175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 151

SP - 1351

EP - 1360

JO - American Journal of Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0002-953X

IS - 9

ER -