Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: A monocular analysis

Donald C. Hood, Nitin Ohri, Bo E. Yang, Christopher Rodarte, Xian Zhang, Brad Fortune, Chris A. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To describe a methodology for measuring abnormal timing of monocular multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP). Methods: The mfVEPs from 100 individuals with normal visual fields and normal fundus exams were analyzed. The stimulus was a 60 sector, pattern-reversing dartboard display. For each of the 60 locations of the dartboard and each channel and each eye, a template was derived based upon the average of the responses from the 100 normal individuals. In deriving this template, care was taken to exclude those responses reversed in polarity as compared to the average response. The best array of responses for each individual was compared to these templates. The relative latency of each response was measured as the temporal shift producing the best cross-correlation value. Results: The 95% confidence interval (CI) decreased as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the mfVEP responses increased. For example, the 95% CI decreased from over 17 ms to under 9 ms as the SNR increased. Grouping and summing the responses also lead to an increase in SNR and a decrease in CI. Because the number of points exceeding the CI is not randomly distributed among normal individuals, a cluster criterion (e.g. two or more contiguous points within a hemisphere exceeding a given confidence interval) can be helpful. For example, while 18% of the eyes had 5 or more points exceeding the 5% confidence interval, only 6.5% of the eyes had a cluster of 5 of these points. The correlation between relative latency and age was relatively low (r = 0.46). Conclusion: For detecting abnormalities in the timing of monocular, mfVEP responses, a template method provides a reasonable approach. In devising a particular test for abnormal timing, the CI should be based upon the SNR of the response. In addition, grouping and summing responses to increase SNR or employing a cluster test may also prove useful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-199
Number of pages11
JournalDocumenta Ophthalmologica
Volume109
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Visual Evoked Potentials
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Confidence Intervals
Visual Fields
Reaction Time

Keywords

  • Electrophysiology
  • Latency
  • Multifocal visual evoked potential
  • VEP

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials : A monocular analysis. / Hood, Donald C.; Ohri, Nitin; Yang, Bo E.; Rodarte, Christopher; Zhang, Xian; Fortune, Brad; Johnson, Chris A.

In: Documenta Ophthalmologica, Vol. 109, No. 2, 09.2004, p. 189-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hood, Donald C. ; Ohri, Nitin ; Yang, Bo E. ; Rodarte, Christopher ; Zhang, Xian ; Fortune, Brad ; Johnson, Chris A. / Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials : A monocular analysis. In: Documenta Ophthalmologica. 2004 ; Vol. 109, No. 2. pp. 189-199.
@article{fd824e10957942b58e16b6c3f1799101,
title = "Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: A monocular analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: To describe a methodology for measuring abnormal timing of monocular multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP). Methods: The mfVEPs from 100 individuals with normal visual fields and normal fundus exams were analyzed. The stimulus was a 60 sector, pattern-reversing dartboard display. For each of the 60 locations of the dartboard and each channel and each eye, a template was derived based upon the average of the responses from the 100 normal individuals. In deriving this template, care was taken to exclude those responses reversed in polarity as compared to the average response. The best array of responses for each individual was compared to these templates. The relative latency of each response was measured as the temporal shift producing the best cross-correlation value. Results: The 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) decreased as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the mfVEP responses increased. For example, the 95{\%} CI decreased from over 17 ms to under 9 ms as the SNR increased. Grouping and summing the responses also lead to an increase in SNR and a decrease in CI. Because the number of points exceeding the CI is not randomly distributed among normal individuals, a cluster criterion (e.g. two or more contiguous points within a hemisphere exceeding a given confidence interval) can be helpful. For example, while 18{\%} of the eyes had 5 or more points exceeding the 5{\%} confidence interval, only 6.5{\%} of the eyes had a cluster of 5 of these points. The correlation between relative latency and age was relatively low (r = 0.46). Conclusion: For detecting abnormalities in the timing of monocular, mfVEP responses, a template method provides a reasonable approach. In devising a particular test for abnormal timing, the CI should be based upon the SNR of the response. In addition, grouping and summing responses to increase SNR or employing a cluster test may also prove useful.",
keywords = "Electrophysiology, Latency, Multifocal visual evoked potential, VEP",
author = "Hood, {Donald C.} and Nitin Ohri and Yang, {Bo E.} and Christopher Rodarte and Xian Zhang and Brad Fortune and Johnson, {Chris A.}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s10633-004-5512-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "109",
pages = "189--199",
journal = "Documenta Ophthalmologica",
issn = "0012-4486",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials

T2 - A monocular analysis

AU - Hood, Donald C.

AU - Ohri, Nitin

AU - Yang, Bo E.

AU - Rodarte, Christopher

AU - Zhang, Xian

AU - Fortune, Brad

AU - Johnson, Chris A.

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - Purpose: To describe a methodology for measuring abnormal timing of monocular multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP). Methods: The mfVEPs from 100 individuals with normal visual fields and normal fundus exams were analyzed. The stimulus was a 60 sector, pattern-reversing dartboard display. For each of the 60 locations of the dartboard and each channel and each eye, a template was derived based upon the average of the responses from the 100 normal individuals. In deriving this template, care was taken to exclude those responses reversed in polarity as compared to the average response. The best array of responses for each individual was compared to these templates. The relative latency of each response was measured as the temporal shift producing the best cross-correlation value. Results: The 95% confidence interval (CI) decreased as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the mfVEP responses increased. For example, the 95% CI decreased from over 17 ms to under 9 ms as the SNR increased. Grouping and summing the responses also lead to an increase in SNR and a decrease in CI. Because the number of points exceeding the CI is not randomly distributed among normal individuals, a cluster criterion (e.g. two or more contiguous points within a hemisphere exceeding a given confidence interval) can be helpful. For example, while 18% of the eyes had 5 or more points exceeding the 5% confidence interval, only 6.5% of the eyes had a cluster of 5 of these points. The correlation between relative latency and age was relatively low (r = 0.46). Conclusion: For detecting abnormalities in the timing of monocular, mfVEP responses, a template method provides a reasonable approach. In devising a particular test for abnormal timing, the CI should be based upon the SNR of the response. In addition, grouping and summing responses to increase SNR or employing a cluster test may also prove useful.

AB - Purpose: To describe a methodology for measuring abnormal timing of monocular multifocal visual evoked potentials (mfVEP). Methods: The mfVEPs from 100 individuals with normal visual fields and normal fundus exams were analyzed. The stimulus was a 60 sector, pattern-reversing dartboard display. For each of the 60 locations of the dartboard and each channel and each eye, a template was derived based upon the average of the responses from the 100 normal individuals. In deriving this template, care was taken to exclude those responses reversed in polarity as compared to the average response. The best array of responses for each individual was compared to these templates. The relative latency of each response was measured as the temporal shift producing the best cross-correlation value. Results: The 95% confidence interval (CI) decreased as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the mfVEP responses increased. For example, the 95% CI decreased from over 17 ms to under 9 ms as the SNR increased. Grouping and summing the responses also lead to an increase in SNR and a decrease in CI. Because the number of points exceeding the CI is not randomly distributed among normal individuals, a cluster criterion (e.g. two or more contiguous points within a hemisphere exceeding a given confidence interval) can be helpful. For example, while 18% of the eyes had 5 or more points exceeding the 5% confidence interval, only 6.5% of the eyes had a cluster of 5 of these points. The correlation between relative latency and age was relatively low (r = 0.46). Conclusion: For detecting abnormalities in the timing of monocular, mfVEP responses, a template method provides a reasonable approach. In devising a particular test for abnormal timing, the CI should be based upon the SNR of the response. In addition, grouping and summing responses to increase SNR or employing a cluster test may also prove useful.

KW - Electrophysiology

KW - Latency

KW - Multifocal visual evoked potential

KW - VEP

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16344396310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=16344396310&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10633-004-5512-0

DO - 10.1007/s10633-004-5512-0

M3 - Article

C2 - 15881265

AN - SCOPUS:16344396310

VL - 109

SP - 189

EP - 199

JO - Documenta Ophthalmologica

JF - Documenta Ophthalmologica

SN - 0012-4486

IS - 2

ER -