Day hospital as an alternative to inpatient care for cancer patients

A random assignment trial

Vincent Mor, Martha Z. Stalker, Richard J. Gralla, Howard I. Scher, Claudia Cimma, Donna Park, Anne Marie Flaherty, Margaret Kiss, Paul Nelson, Linda Laliberte, Rachel Schwartz, Paul A. Marks, Herbert F. Oettgen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A stratified, random-assignment trial of 442 cancer patients was conducted to evaluate medical, psychosocial, and financial outcomes of day hospital treatment as an alternative to inpatient care for certain cancer patients. Eligible patients required: a 4- to 8-hour treatment plan, including chemotherapy and other long-term intravenous (i.v.) treatment; a stable cardiovascular status; mental competence; no skilled overnight nursing; and a helper to assist with home care. Patients were ineligible if standard outpatient treatment was possible. No statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences were found between the Adult Day Hospital (ADH) and Inpatient care in medical or psychosocial outcomes over the 60-day study period. The major difference was in medical costs-approximately one-third lower for ADH patients (p < 0.001) than for the Inpatient group. The study demonstrates that day hospital care of medical oncology patients is clinically equivalent to Inpatient care, causes no negative psychosocial effects, and costs less than Inpatient care. Findings support the trend toward dehospitalization of medical treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)771-785
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume41
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Inpatients
Patient Care
Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Medical Oncology
Home Care Services
Mental Competency
Nursing
Outpatients
Drug Therapy

Keywords

  • Alternative to hospital
  • Cost
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Quality of life
  • Randomized design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Day hospital as an alternative to inpatient care for cancer patients : A random assignment trial. / Mor, Vincent; Stalker, Martha Z.; Gralla, Richard J.; Scher, Howard I.; Cimma, Claudia; Park, Donna; Flaherty, Anne Marie; Kiss, Margaret; Nelson, Paul; Laliberte, Linda; Schwartz, Rachel; Marks, Paul A.; Oettgen, Herbert F.

In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 41, No. 8, 1988, p. 771-785.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mor, V, Stalker, MZ, Gralla, RJ, Scher, HI, Cimma, C, Park, D, Flaherty, AM, Kiss, M, Nelson, P, Laliberte, L, Schwartz, R, Marks, PA & Oettgen, HF 1988, 'Day hospital as an alternative to inpatient care for cancer patients: A random assignment trial', Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 771-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(88)90164-3
Mor, Vincent ; Stalker, Martha Z. ; Gralla, Richard J. ; Scher, Howard I. ; Cimma, Claudia ; Park, Donna ; Flaherty, Anne Marie ; Kiss, Margaret ; Nelson, Paul ; Laliberte, Linda ; Schwartz, Rachel ; Marks, Paul A. ; Oettgen, Herbert F. / Day hospital as an alternative to inpatient care for cancer patients : A random assignment trial. In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 1988 ; Vol. 41, No. 8. pp. 771-785.
@article{2c58d16e8ad54dd78a80a94f9bc479ab,
title = "Day hospital as an alternative to inpatient care for cancer patients: A random assignment trial",
abstract = "A stratified, random-assignment trial of 442 cancer patients was conducted to evaluate medical, psychosocial, and financial outcomes of day hospital treatment as an alternative to inpatient care for certain cancer patients. Eligible patients required: a 4- to 8-hour treatment plan, including chemotherapy and other long-term intravenous (i.v.) treatment; a stable cardiovascular status; mental competence; no skilled overnight nursing; and a helper to assist with home care. Patients were ineligible if standard outpatient treatment was possible. No statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences were found between the Adult Day Hospital (ADH) and Inpatient care in medical or psychosocial outcomes over the 60-day study period. The major difference was in medical costs-approximately one-third lower for ADH patients (p < 0.001) than for the Inpatient group. The study demonstrates that day hospital care of medical oncology patients is clinically equivalent to Inpatient care, causes no negative psychosocial effects, and costs less than Inpatient care. Findings support the trend toward dehospitalization of medical treatment.",
keywords = "Alternative to hospital, Cost, Cost-effectiveness, Quality of life, Randomized design",
author = "Vincent Mor and Stalker, {Martha Z.} and Gralla, {Richard J.} and Scher, {Howard I.} and Claudia Cimma and Donna Park and Flaherty, {Anne Marie} and Margaret Kiss and Paul Nelson and Linda Laliberte and Rachel Schwartz and Marks, {Paul A.} and Oettgen, {Herbert F.}",
year = "1988",
doi = "10.1016/0895-4356(88)90164-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "771--785",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Epidemiology",
issn = "0895-4356",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Day hospital as an alternative to inpatient care for cancer patients

T2 - A random assignment trial

AU - Mor, Vincent

AU - Stalker, Martha Z.

AU - Gralla, Richard J.

AU - Scher, Howard I.

AU - Cimma, Claudia

AU - Park, Donna

AU - Flaherty, Anne Marie

AU - Kiss, Margaret

AU - Nelson, Paul

AU - Laliberte, Linda

AU - Schwartz, Rachel

AU - Marks, Paul A.

AU - Oettgen, Herbert F.

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - A stratified, random-assignment trial of 442 cancer patients was conducted to evaluate medical, psychosocial, and financial outcomes of day hospital treatment as an alternative to inpatient care for certain cancer patients. Eligible patients required: a 4- to 8-hour treatment plan, including chemotherapy and other long-term intravenous (i.v.) treatment; a stable cardiovascular status; mental competence; no skilled overnight nursing; and a helper to assist with home care. Patients were ineligible if standard outpatient treatment was possible. No statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences were found between the Adult Day Hospital (ADH) and Inpatient care in medical or psychosocial outcomes over the 60-day study period. The major difference was in medical costs-approximately one-third lower for ADH patients (p < 0.001) than for the Inpatient group. The study demonstrates that day hospital care of medical oncology patients is clinically equivalent to Inpatient care, causes no negative psychosocial effects, and costs less than Inpatient care. Findings support the trend toward dehospitalization of medical treatment.

AB - A stratified, random-assignment trial of 442 cancer patients was conducted to evaluate medical, psychosocial, and financial outcomes of day hospital treatment as an alternative to inpatient care for certain cancer patients. Eligible patients required: a 4- to 8-hour treatment plan, including chemotherapy and other long-term intravenous (i.v.) treatment; a stable cardiovascular status; mental competence; no skilled overnight nursing; and a helper to assist with home care. Patients were ineligible if standard outpatient treatment was possible. No statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences were found between the Adult Day Hospital (ADH) and Inpatient care in medical or psychosocial outcomes over the 60-day study period. The major difference was in medical costs-approximately one-third lower for ADH patients (p < 0.001) than for the Inpatient group. The study demonstrates that day hospital care of medical oncology patients is clinically equivalent to Inpatient care, causes no negative psychosocial effects, and costs less than Inpatient care. Findings support the trend toward dehospitalization of medical treatment.

KW - Alternative to hospital

KW - Cost

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Quality of life

KW - Randomized design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023748968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023748968&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90164-3

DO - 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90164-3

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 771

EP - 785

JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

SN - 0895-4356

IS - 8

ER -