Consolidation therapy for ovarian cancer

Gloria S. Huang, Gary L. Goldberg, Abbie L. Fields

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Purpose. To review all the published randomized trials of consolidation therapy in ovarian cancer, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and potential targeted/ biologic agents. Design. A Medline search was conducted to identify all publications on consolidation therapy in ovarian cancer. Proceedings of national and international meetings were also searched. Results. Platinum-based consolidation therapy is difficult to tolerate and does not confer a survival benefit. Prolonged Paclitaxel therapy lengthens the recurrence-free interval, with increased neurotoxicity. Intraperitoneal (IP) consolidation therapy is limited by marginal clinical acceptance and catheter-related complications. Oral consolidation regimens have not yet been evaluated in a randomized study. IP 32P is ineffective. Whole-abdominal radiotherapy (WAR) improves the progression-free but not overall survival in selected patients. Late radiation toxicities remain a concern with WAR. Oregovamab, an antibody to CA-125, is presently under evaluation. To date, the impact of consolidation therapy on quality-of-life remains unclear. Conclusion. An effective, minimally toxic agent for consolidation therapy in ovarian cancer has not yet been identified.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-8
Number of pages6
JournalWomen's Oncology Review
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Consolidation therapy for ovarian cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Huang, G. S., Goldberg, G. L., & Fields, A. L. (2005). Consolidation therapy for ovarian cancer. Women's Oncology Review, 5(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733400500070708