Comprehensive evaluation of indoor tanning regulations: A 50-State Analysis, 2012

Bridget Gosis, Blake P. Sampson, Andrew B. Seidenberg, Sophie J. Balk, Mark Gottlieb, Alan C. Geller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Teenage use of indoor tanning has reached epidemic proportions. There is no federal ban on teen use; rather, it is left to each state to determine policy. We conducted a state-by-state analysis using data from each state's statutes and regulations and supplementary information from the National Conference of State Legislatures. First, we refined an earlier 35-item instrument to now include 56 items that extensively measures age bans, parental involvement, warnings/information, enforcement, and operating requirements. To grade each tanning law, we developed a uniform scoring system with a goal of providing performance data for future comparisons. As of August 2012, 13 states had no tanning facility statute or regulation for minors. In states with some regulations, teen bans are lax - nearly uniformly, most young children under the age of 14 can legally tan with or without suboptimal parental consent or accompaniment laws. Strong Food and Drug Administration involvement can simplify and unify the inconsistencies that exist among states' indoor tanning laws. Until consistent regulations are promulgated and enforced, such an instrument can provide a benchmark for state investigations into the deficiencies and progress of their laws, as well as facilitate direct comparison between states for research and educational purposes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)620-627
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Investigative Dermatology
Volume134
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

Tanning
Parental Consent
Minors
Benchmarking
United States Food and Drug Administration
Parents
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Biochemistry
  • Cell Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Comprehensive evaluation of indoor tanning regulations : A 50-State Analysis, 2012. / Gosis, Bridget; Sampson, Blake P.; Seidenberg, Andrew B.; Balk, Sophie J.; Gottlieb, Mark; Geller, Alan C.

In: Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Vol. 134, No. 3, 03.2014, p. 620-627.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gosis, Bridget ; Sampson, Blake P. ; Seidenberg, Andrew B. ; Balk, Sophie J. ; Gottlieb, Mark ; Geller, Alan C. / Comprehensive evaluation of indoor tanning regulations : A 50-State Analysis, 2012. In: Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 2014 ; Vol. 134, No. 3. pp. 620-627.
@article{1556a26619074e90bbf8188dbffbf689,
title = "Comprehensive evaluation of indoor tanning regulations: A 50-State Analysis, 2012",
abstract = "Teenage use of indoor tanning has reached epidemic proportions. There is no federal ban on teen use; rather, it is left to each state to determine policy. We conducted a state-by-state analysis using data from each state's statutes and regulations and supplementary information from the National Conference of State Legislatures. First, we refined an earlier 35-item instrument to now include 56 items that extensively measures age bans, parental involvement, warnings/information, enforcement, and operating requirements. To grade each tanning law, we developed a uniform scoring system with a goal of providing performance data for future comparisons. As of August 2012, 13 states had no tanning facility statute or regulation for minors. In states with some regulations, teen bans are lax - nearly uniformly, most young children under the age of 14 can legally tan with or without suboptimal parental consent or accompaniment laws. Strong Food and Drug Administration involvement can simplify and unify the inconsistencies that exist among states' indoor tanning laws. Until consistent regulations are promulgated and enforced, such an instrument can provide a benchmark for state investigations into the deficiencies and progress of their laws, as well as facilitate direct comparison between states for research and educational purposes.",
author = "Bridget Gosis and Sampson, {Blake P.} and Seidenberg, {Andrew B.} and Balk, {Sophie J.} and Mark Gottlieb and Geller, {Alan C.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1038/jid.2013.357",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "134",
pages = "620--627",
journal = "Journal of Investigative Dermatology",
issn = "0022-202X",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comprehensive evaluation of indoor tanning regulations

T2 - A 50-State Analysis, 2012

AU - Gosis, Bridget

AU - Sampson, Blake P.

AU - Seidenberg, Andrew B.

AU - Balk, Sophie J.

AU - Gottlieb, Mark

AU - Geller, Alan C.

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Teenage use of indoor tanning has reached epidemic proportions. There is no federal ban on teen use; rather, it is left to each state to determine policy. We conducted a state-by-state analysis using data from each state's statutes and regulations and supplementary information from the National Conference of State Legislatures. First, we refined an earlier 35-item instrument to now include 56 items that extensively measures age bans, parental involvement, warnings/information, enforcement, and operating requirements. To grade each tanning law, we developed a uniform scoring system with a goal of providing performance data for future comparisons. As of August 2012, 13 states had no tanning facility statute or regulation for minors. In states with some regulations, teen bans are lax - nearly uniformly, most young children under the age of 14 can legally tan with or without suboptimal parental consent or accompaniment laws. Strong Food and Drug Administration involvement can simplify and unify the inconsistencies that exist among states' indoor tanning laws. Until consistent regulations are promulgated and enforced, such an instrument can provide a benchmark for state investigations into the deficiencies and progress of their laws, as well as facilitate direct comparison between states for research and educational purposes.

AB - Teenage use of indoor tanning has reached epidemic proportions. There is no federal ban on teen use; rather, it is left to each state to determine policy. We conducted a state-by-state analysis using data from each state's statutes and regulations and supplementary information from the National Conference of State Legislatures. First, we refined an earlier 35-item instrument to now include 56 items that extensively measures age bans, parental involvement, warnings/information, enforcement, and operating requirements. To grade each tanning law, we developed a uniform scoring system with a goal of providing performance data for future comparisons. As of August 2012, 13 states had no tanning facility statute or regulation for minors. In states with some regulations, teen bans are lax - nearly uniformly, most young children under the age of 14 can legally tan with or without suboptimal parental consent or accompaniment laws. Strong Food and Drug Administration involvement can simplify and unify the inconsistencies that exist among states' indoor tanning laws. Until consistent regulations are promulgated and enforced, such an instrument can provide a benchmark for state investigations into the deficiencies and progress of their laws, as well as facilitate direct comparison between states for research and educational purposes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894029947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894029947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/jid.2013.357

DO - 10.1038/jid.2013.357

M3 - Article

C2 - 23974917

AN - SCOPUS:84894029947

VL - 134

SP - 620

EP - 627

JO - Journal of Investigative Dermatology

JF - Journal of Investigative Dermatology

SN - 0022-202X

IS - 3

ER -