Comparison of Ultrasound Guidance vs. Clinical Assessment Alone for Management of Pediatric Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

Samuel H.F. Lam, Adam Sivitz, Kiyetta Alade, Stephanie J. Doniger, Mark O. Tessaro, Joni E. Rabiner, Alexander Arroyo, Edward M. Castillo, Caroline A. Thompson, Mingan Yang, Rakesh D. Mistry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can potentially help distinguish cellulitis from abscess, which can appear very similar on physical examination but necessitate different treatment approaches. Objective: To compare POCUS guidance vs. clinical assessment alone on the management of pediatric skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) in the emergency department (ED) setting. Methods: Children ages 6 months to 18 years presenting to participating EDs with SSTIs ≥ 1 cm were eligible. All treatment decisions, including use of POCUS, were at the discretion of the treating clinicians. Patients were divided into those managed with POCUS guidance (POCUS group) and those managed using clinical assessment alone (non-POCUS group). Primary outcome was clinical treatment failure at 7–10 days (unscheduled ED return visit or admission, procedural intervention, change in antibiotics therapy). Secondary outcomes were ED length of stay, discharge rate, use of alternative imaging, and need for procedural sedation. POCUS utility and impact on management decisions were also assessed by treating clinicians. Results: In total, 321 subjects (327 lesions) were analyzed, of which 299 (93%) had completed follow-up. There was no significant difference between the POCUS and non-POCUS groups in any of the primary or secondary outcomes. Management plan was changed in the POCUS group in 22.9% of cases (13.8% from medical to surgical, 9.1% from surgical to medical). Clinicians reported increased benefit of POCUS in cases of higher clinical uncertainty. Conclusions: Use of POCUS was not associated with decreased ED treatment failure rate or process outcomes in pediatric SSTI patients. However, POCUS changed the management plan in approximately one in four cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)693-701
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume55
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Point-of-Care Systems
Soft Tissue Infections
Pediatrics
Skin
Hospital Emergency Service
Treatment Failure
Cellulitis
Emergency Treatment
Abscess
Physical Examination
Uncertainty
Length of Stay

Keywords

  • emergency
  • pediatrics
  • skin and soft tissue infections
  • ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Lam, S. H. F., Sivitz, A., Alade, K., Doniger, S. J., Tessaro, M. O., Rabiner, J. E., ... Mistry, R. D. (2018). Comparison of Ultrasound Guidance vs. Clinical Assessment Alone for Management of Pediatric Skin and Soft Tissue Infections. Journal of Emergency Medicine, 55(5), 693-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.07.010

Comparison of Ultrasound Guidance vs. Clinical Assessment Alone for Management of Pediatric Skin and Soft Tissue Infections. / Lam, Samuel H.F.; Sivitz, Adam; Alade, Kiyetta; Doniger, Stephanie J.; Tessaro, Mark O.; Rabiner, Joni E.; Arroyo, Alexander; Castillo, Edward M.; Thompson, Caroline A.; Yang, Mingan; Mistry, Rakesh D.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 55, No. 5, 01.11.2018, p. 693-701.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lam, SHF, Sivitz, A, Alade, K, Doniger, SJ, Tessaro, MO, Rabiner, JE, Arroyo, A, Castillo, EM, Thompson, CA, Yang, M & Mistry, RD 2018, 'Comparison of Ultrasound Guidance vs. Clinical Assessment Alone for Management of Pediatric Skin and Soft Tissue Infections', Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 693-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.07.010
Lam, Samuel H.F. ; Sivitz, Adam ; Alade, Kiyetta ; Doniger, Stephanie J. ; Tessaro, Mark O. ; Rabiner, Joni E. ; Arroyo, Alexander ; Castillo, Edward M. ; Thompson, Caroline A. ; Yang, Mingan ; Mistry, Rakesh D. / Comparison of Ultrasound Guidance vs. Clinical Assessment Alone for Management of Pediatric Skin and Soft Tissue Infections. In: Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 55, No. 5. pp. 693-701.
@article{a348d174e36d44f5bfae36b9bc514a17,
title = "Comparison of Ultrasound Guidance vs. Clinical Assessment Alone for Management of Pediatric Skin and Soft Tissue Infections",
abstract = "Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can potentially help distinguish cellulitis from abscess, which can appear very similar on physical examination but necessitate different treatment approaches. Objective: To compare POCUS guidance vs. clinical assessment alone on the management of pediatric skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) in the emergency department (ED) setting. Methods: Children ages 6 months to 18 years presenting to participating EDs with SSTIs ≥ 1 cm were eligible. All treatment decisions, including use of POCUS, were at the discretion of the treating clinicians. Patients were divided into those managed with POCUS guidance (POCUS group) and those managed using clinical assessment alone (non-POCUS group). Primary outcome was clinical treatment failure at 7–10 days (unscheduled ED return visit or admission, procedural intervention, change in antibiotics therapy). Secondary outcomes were ED length of stay, discharge rate, use of alternative imaging, and need for procedural sedation. POCUS utility and impact on management decisions were also assessed by treating clinicians. Results: In total, 321 subjects (327 lesions) were analyzed, of which 299 (93{\%}) had completed follow-up. There was no significant difference between the POCUS and non-POCUS groups in any of the primary or secondary outcomes. Management plan was changed in the POCUS group in 22.9{\%} of cases (13.8{\%} from medical to surgical, 9.1{\%} from surgical to medical). Clinicians reported increased benefit of POCUS in cases of higher clinical uncertainty. Conclusions: Use of POCUS was not associated with decreased ED treatment failure rate or process outcomes in pediatric SSTI patients. However, POCUS changed the management plan in approximately one in four cases.",
keywords = "emergency, pediatrics, skin and soft tissue infections, ultrasonography",
author = "Lam, {Samuel H.F.} and Adam Sivitz and Kiyetta Alade and Doniger, {Stephanie J.} and Tessaro, {Mark O.} and Rabiner, {Joni E.} and Alexander Arroyo and Castillo, {Edward M.} and Thompson, {Caroline A.} and Mingan Yang and Mistry, {Rakesh D.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.07.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "693--701",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Ultrasound Guidance vs. Clinical Assessment Alone for Management of Pediatric Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

AU - Lam, Samuel H.F.

AU - Sivitz, Adam

AU - Alade, Kiyetta

AU - Doniger, Stephanie J.

AU - Tessaro, Mark O.

AU - Rabiner, Joni E.

AU - Arroyo, Alexander

AU - Castillo, Edward M.

AU - Thompson, Caroline A.

AU - Yang, Mingan

AU - Mistry, Rakesh D.

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can potentially help distinguish cellulitis from abscess, which can appear very similar on physical examination but necessitate different treatment approaches. Objective: To compare POCUS guidance vs. clinical assessment alone on the management of pediatric skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) in the emergency department (ED) setting. Methods: Children ages 6 months to 18 years presenting to participating EDs with SSTIs ≥ 1 cm were eligible. All treatment decisions, including use of POCUS, were at the discretion of the treating clinicians. Patients were divided into those managed with POCUS guidance (POCUS group) and those managed using clinical assessment alone (non-POCUS group). Primary outcome was clinical treatment failure at 7–10 days (unscheduled ED return visit or admission, procedural intervention, change in antibiotics therapy). Secondary outcomes were ED length of stay, discharge rate, use of alternative imaging, and need for procedural sedation. POCUS utility and impact on management decisions were also assessed by treating clinicians. Results: In total, 321 subjects (327 lesions) were analyzed, of which 299 (93%) had completed follow-up. There was no significant difference between the POCUS and non-POCUS groups in any of the primary or secondary outcomes. Management plan was changed in the POCUS group in 22.9% of cases (13.8% from medical to surgical, 9.1% from surgical to medical). Clinicians reported increased benefit of POCUS in cases of higher clinical uncertainty. Conclusions: Use of POCUS was not associated with decreased ED treatment failure rate or process outcomes in pediatric SSTI patients. However, POCUS changed the management plan in approximately one in four cases.

AB - Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can potentially help distinguish cellulitis from abscess, which can appear very similar on physical examination but necessitate different treatment approaches. Objective: To compare POCUS guidance vs. clinical assessment alone on the management of pediatric skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) in the emergency department (ED) setting. Methods: Children ages 6 months to 18 years presenting to participating EDs with SSTIs ≥ 1 cm were eligible. All treatment decisions, including use of POCUS, were at the discretion of the treating clinicians. Patients were divided into those managed with POCUS guidance (POCUS group) and those managed using clinical assessment alone (non-POCUS group). Primary outcome was clinical treatment failure at 7–10 days (unscheduled ED return visit or admission, procedural intervention, change in antibiotics therapy). Secondary outcomes were ED length of stay, discharge rate, use of alternative imaging, and need for procedural sedation. POCUS utility and impact on management decisions were also assessed by treating clinicians. Results: In total, 321 subjects (327 lesions) were analyzed, of which 299 (93%) had completed follow-up. There was no significant difference between the POCUS and non-POCUS groups in any of the primary or secondary outcomes. Management plan was changed in the POCUS group in 22.9% of cases (13.8% from medical to surgical, 9.1% from surgical to medical). Clinicians reported increased benefit of POCUS in cases of higher clinical uncertainty. Conclusions: Use of POCUS was not associated with decreased ED treatment failure rate or process outcomes in pediatric SSTI patients. However, POCUS changed the management plan in approximately one in four cases.

KW - emergency

KW - pediatrics

KW - skin and soft tissue infections

KW - ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054472358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054472358&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.07.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.07.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 30170835

AN - SCOPUS:85054472358

VL - 55

SP - 693

EP - 701

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 5

ER -