Comparison of Laboratory Values Obtained by Phlebotomy versus Saline Lock Devices

Jill Corbo, Lequan Fu, Matthew Silver, Hany Atallah, Polly E. Bijur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the utility of a peripheral saline lock device (SLD) as an alternative to a second venipuncture for obtaining selected blood samples. Methods: This prospective study used a comparative design and was conducted in an urban emergency department (ED). Adult patients with an existing SLD in place who required serial phlebotomy were eligible for inclusion in the study. Each subject had blood samples obtained by venipuncture (control) with a Vacutainer adapter according to standard protocols. Within 5 minutes of obtaining the control samples, a sample was obtained from the patients' SLDs; a tourniquet was applied proximal to the intravenous line, a 5-mL waste portion was obtained, and a Vacutainer adapter was placed to draw specimens for testing. Each of the paired samples was analyzed for hematocrit, electrolytes, and cardiac enzymes. The Bland-Altman method was used to analyze the concordance between each pair of measurements. Paired t-tests for each of the eight laboratory tests were used to assess whether the values were statistically different from each other. The 95% limits of agreement around the mean differences were calculated. Differences between SLD aspirates and venipuncture aspirates also were compared with the federal regulatory standards that ensure reliable and accurate laboratory testing. Results: Eighty-one patients were eligible for the study; in 73 (90.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 81.5% to 95.6%) of the patients, the SLD could be aspirated for testing. The paired t-tests indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the mean values of the two methods of testing. Of the 584 paired values analyzed, 35 (6.0%; 95% CI = 4.3% to 8.2%) exceeded the Bland-Altman limits of agreement, and 43 (7.4%; 95% CI = 5.4% to 9.8%) fell outside the acceptable range determined by the federal regulation of clinical laboratories. Of those values that exceeded the acceptable Bland-Altman limits of agreement, none would have resulted in clinical intervention. Conclusions: Aspirating blood via an SLD is an acceptable method of obtaining serial laboratory values in a group of stable, consenting adult ED patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-27
Number of pages5
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

Fingerprint

Phlebotomy
Equipment and Supplies
Confidence Intervals
Hospital Emergency Service
Tourniquets
Hematocrit
Electrolytes
Prospective Studies
Enzymes

Keywords

  • phlebotomy
  • saline lock devices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Comparison of Laboratory Values Obtained by Phlebotomy versus Saline Lock Devices. / Corbo, Jill; Fu, Lequan; Silver, Matthew; Atallah, Hany; Bijur, Polly E.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.2007, p. 23-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Corbo, Jill ; Fu, Lequan ; Silver, Matthew ; Atallah, Hany ; Bijur, Polly E. / Comparison of Laboratory Values Obtained by Phlebotomy versus Saline Lock Devices. In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 1. pp. 23-27.
@article{e10e299f6461473ca4d0ccfb97486e69,
title = "Comparison of Laboratory Values Obtained by Phlebotomy versus Saline Lock Devices",
abstract = "Objectives: To assess the utility of a peripheral saline lock device (SLD) as an alternative to a second venipuncture for obtaining selected blood samples. Methods: This prospective study used a comparative design and was conducted in an urban emergency department (ED). Adult patients with an existing SLD in place who required serial phlebotomy were eligible for inclusion in the study. Each subject had blood samples obtained by venipuncture (control) with a Vacutainer adapter according to standard protocols. Within 5 minutes of obtaining the control samples, a sample was obtained from the patients' SLDs; a tourniquet was applied proximal to the intravenous line, a 5-mL waste portion was obtained, and a Vacutainer adapter was placed to draw specimens for testing. Each of the paired samples was analyzed for hematocrit, electrolytes, and cardiac enzymes. The Bland-Altman method was used to analyze the concordance between each pair of measurements. Paired t-tests for each of the eight laboratory tests were used to assess whether the values were statistically different from each other. The 95{\%} limits of agreement around the mean differences were calculated. Differences between SLD aspirates and venipuncture aspirates also were compared with the federal regulatory standards that ensure reliable and accurate laboratory testing. Results: Eighty-one patients were eligible for the study; in 73 (90.1{\%}; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] = 81.5{\%} to 95.6{\%}) of the patients, the SLD could be aspirated for testing. The paired t-tests indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the mean values of the two methods of testing. Of the 584 paired values analyzed, 35 (6.0{\%}; 95{\%} CI = 4.3{\%} to 8.2{\%}) exceeded the Bland-Altman limits of agreement, and 43 (7.4{\%}; 95{\%} CI = 5.4{\%} to 9.8{\%}) fell outside the acceptable range determined by the federal regulation of clinical laboratories. Of those values that exceeded the acceptable Bland-Altman limits of agreement, none would have resulted in clinical intervention. Conclusions: Aspirating blood via an SLD is an acceptable method of obtaining serial laboratory values in a group of stable, consenting adult ED patients.",
keywords = "phlebotomy, saline lock devices",
author = "Jill Corbo and Lequan Fu and Matthew Silver and Hany Atallah and Bijur, {Polly E.}",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.053",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "23--27",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Laboratory Values Obtained by Phlebotomy versus Saline Lock Devices

AU - Corbo, Jill

AU - Fu, Lequan

AU - Silver, Matthew

AU - Atallah, Hany

AU - Bijur, Polly E.

PY - 2007/1

Y1 - 2007/1

N2 - Objectives: To assess the utility of a peripheral saline lock device (SLD) as an alternative to a second venipuncture for obtaining selected blood samples. Methods: This prospective study used a comparative design and was conducted in an urban emergency department (ED). Adult patients with an existing SLD in place who required serial phlebotomy were eligible for inclusion in the study. Each subject had blood samples obtained by venipuncture (control) with a Vacutainer adapter according to standard protocols. Within 5 minutes of obtaining the control samples, a sample was obtained from the patients' SLDs; a tourniquet was applied proximal to the intravenous line, a 5-mL waste portion was obtained, and a Vacutainer adapter was placed to draw specimens for testing. Each of the paired samples was analyzed for hematocrit, electrolytes, and cardiac enzymes. The Bland-Altman method was used to analyze the concordance between each pair of measurements. Paired t-tests for each of the eight laboratory tests were used to assess whether the values were statistically different from each other. The 95% limits of agreement around the mean differences were calculated. Differences between SLD aspirates and venipuncture aspirates also were compared with the federal regulatory standards that ensure reliable and accurate laboratory testing. Results: Eighty-one patients were eligible for the study; in 73 (90.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 81.5% to 95.6%) of the patients, the SLD could be aspirated for testing. The paired t-tests indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the mean values of the two methods of testing. Of the 584 paired values analyzed, 35 (6.0%; 95% CI = 4.3% to 8.2%) exceeded the Bland-Altman limits of agreement, and 43 (7.4%; 95% CI = 5.4% to 9.8%) fell outside the acceptable range determined by the federal regulation of clinical laboratories. Of those values that exceeded the acceptable Bland-Altman limits of agreement, none would have resulted in clinical intervention. Conclusions: Aspirating blood via an SLD is an acceptable method of obtaining serial laboratory values in a group of stable, consenting adult ED patients.

AB - Objectives: To assess the utility of a peripheral saline lock device (SLD) as an alternative to a second venipuncture for obtaining selected blood samples. Methods: This prospective study used a comparative design and was conducted in an urban emergency department (ED). Adult patients with an existing SLD in place who required serial phlebotomy were eligible for inclusion in the study. Each subject had blood samples obtained by venipuncture (control) with a Vacutainer adapter according to standard protocols. Within 5 minutes of obtaining the control samples, a sample was obtained from the patients' SLDs; a tourniquet was applied proximal to the intravenous line, a 5-mL waste portion was obtained, and a Vacutainer adapter was placed to draw specimens for testing. Each of the paired samples was analyzed for hematocrit, electrolytes, and cardiac enzymes. The Bland-Altman method was used to analyze the concordance between each pair of measurements. Paired t-tests for each of the eight laboratory tests were used to assess whether the values were statistically different from each other. The 95% limits of agreement around the mean differences were calculated. Differences between SLD aspirates and venipuncture aspirates also were compared with the federal regulatory standards that ensure reliable and accurate laboratory testing. Results: Eighty-one patients were eligible for the study; in 73 (90.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 81.5% to 95.6%) of the patients, the SLD could be aspirated for testing. The paired t-tests indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the mean values of the two methods of testing. Of the 584 paired values analyzed, 35 (6.0%; 95% CI = 4.3% to 8.2%) exceeded the Bland-Altman limits of agreement, and 43 (7.4%; 95% CI = 5.4% to 9.8%) fell outside the acceptable range determined by the federal regulation of clinical laboratories. Of those values that exceeded the acceptable Bland-Altman limits of agreement, none would have resulted in clinical intervention. Conclusions: Aspirating blood via an SLD is an acceptable method of obtaining serial laboratory values in a group of stable, consenting adult ED patients.

KW - phlebotomy

KW - saline lock devices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845627790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845627790&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.053

DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.053

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 23

EP - 27

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 1

ER -