Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG: Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Galina Leyvi; Clyde B. Schechter; Sankalp Sehgal; Mark A. Greenberg; Max Snyder; Stephen J. Forest; Alec Mais; Nan Wang; Patrice Deleo; Joseph DeRose

doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031

Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG: Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Galina Leyvi, Clyde B. Schechter, Sankalp Sehgal, Mark A. Greenberg, Max Snyder, Stephen J. Forest, Alec Mais, Nan Wang, Patrice Deleo, Joseph DeRose

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives To compare the direct costs of the index hospitalization and 30-day morbidity and mortality incurred during robotic and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution based on hospital clinical and financial records. Design Retrospective study, propensity-matched groups with one-to-one nearest neighbor matching. Setting University hospital, a tertiary care center. Participants Two thousand eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2007 to March 2012. Interventions One hundred forty-one matched pairs were created and analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Robotic CABG was associated with a decrease in operative time (5.61±1.1 v 6.6±1.15 hours, p

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	12-18
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume	30
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031
State	Published - Jan 1 2016

Keywords

CABG
coronary stent
healthcare costs
minimally invasive surgery
PCI
robotic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Access to Document

10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG: Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Leyvi, G., Schechter, C. B., Sehgal, S., Greenberg, M. A., Snyder, M., Forest, S. J., Mais, A., Wang, N., Deleo, P., & DeRose, J. (2016). Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG: Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 30(1), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031

Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG : Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization. / Leyvi, Galina ; Schechter, Clyde B.; Sehgal, Sankalp; Greenberg, Mark A.; Snyder, Max; Forest, Stephen J.; Mais, Alec; Wang, Nan; Deleo, Patrice; DeRose, Joseph.

In: Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 12-18.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Leyvi, G , Schechter, CB, Sehgal, S, Greenberg, MA, Snyder, M, Forest, SJ, Mais, A, Wang, N, Deleo, P & DeRose, J 2016, 'Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG: Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization', Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 12-18. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031

Leyvi, Galina ; Schechter, Clyde B. ; Sehgal, Sankalp ; Greenberg, Mark A. ; Snyder, Max ; Forest, Stephen J. ; Mais, Alec ; Wang, Nan ; Deleo, Patrice ; DeRose, Joseph. / Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG : Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization. In: Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2016 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 12-18.

@article{8fcbebab1854426ba56f2a509371f269,

title = "Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG: Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization",

abstract = "Objectives To compare the direct costs of the index hospitalization and 30-day morbidity and mortality incurred during robotic and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution based on hospital clinical and financial records. Design Retrospective study, propensity-matched groups with one-to-one nearest neighbor matching. Setting University hospital, a tertiary care center. Participants Two thousand eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2007 to March 2012. Interventions One hundred forty-one matched pairs were created and analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Robotic CABG was associated with a decrease in operative time (5.61±1.1 v 6.6±1.15 hours, p",

keywords = "CABG, coronary stent, healthcare costs, minimally invasive surgery, PCI, robotic surgery",

author = "Galina Leyvi and Schechter, {Clyde B.} and Sankalp Sehgal and Greenberg, {Mark A.} and Max Snyder and Forest, {Stephen J.} and Alec Mais and Nan Wang and Patrice Deleo and Joseph DeRose",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "30",

pages = "12--18",

journal = "Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia",

issn = "1053-0770",

publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG

T2 - Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

AU - Leyvi, Galina

AU - Schechter, Clyde B.

AU - Sehgal, Sankalp

AU - Greenberg, Mark A.

AU - Snyder, Max

AU - Forest, Stephen J.

AU - Mais, Alec

AU - Wang, Nan

AU - Deleo, Patrice

AU - DeRose, Joseph

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objectives To compare the direct costs of the index hospitalization and 30-day morbidity and mortality incurred during robotic and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution based on hospital clinical and financial records. Design Retrospective study, propensity-matched groups with one-to-one nearest neighbor matching. Setting University hospital, a tertiary care center. Participants Two thousand eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2007 to March 2012. Interventions One hundred forty-one matched pairs were created and analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Robotic CABG was associated with a decrease in operative time (5.61±1.1 v 6.6±1.15 hours, p

AB - Objectives To compare the direct costs of the index hospitalization and 30-day morbidity and mortality incurred during robotic and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution based on hospital clinical and financial records. Design Retrospective study, propensity-matched groups with one-to-one nearest neighbor matching. Setting University hospital, a tertiary care center. Participants Two thousand eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2007 to March 2012. Interventions One hundred forty-one matched pairs were created and analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Robotic CABG was associated with a decrease in operative time (5.61±1.1 v 6.6±1.15 hours, p

KW - CABG

KW - coronary stent

KW - healthcare costs

KW - minimally invasive surgery

KW - PCI

KW - robotic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957849822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957849822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031

DO - 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031

M3 - Article

C2 - 26597467

AN - SCOPUS:84957849822

VL - 30

SP - 12

EP - 18

JO - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

SN - 1053-0770

IS - 1

ER -