Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG: Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Galina Leyvi, Clyde B. Schechter, Sankalp Sehgal, Mark A. Greenberg, Max Snyder, Stephen J. Forest, Alec Mais, Nan Wang, Patrice Deleo, Joseph DeRose

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To compare the direct costs of the index hospitalization and 30-day morbidity and mortality incurred during robotic and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution based on hospital clinical and financial records. Design Retrospective study, propensity-matched groups with one-to-one nearest neighbor matching. Setting University hospital, a tertiary care center. Participants Two thousand eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2007 to March 2012. Interventions One hundred forty-one matched pairs were created and analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Robotic CABG was associated with a decrease in operative time (5.61±1.1 v 6.6±1.15 hours, p

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-18
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Robotics
Coronary Artery Bypass
Hospitalization
Costs and Cost Analysis
Operative Time
Tertiary Care Centers
Research Design
Retrospective Studies
Morbidity
Mortality

Keywords

  • CABG
  • coronary stent
  • healthcare costs
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • PCI
  • robotic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

@article{8fcbebab1854426ba56f2a509371f269,
title = "Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG: Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization",
abstract = "Objectives To compare the direct costs of the index hospitalization and 30-day morbidity and mortality incurred during robotic and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution based on hospital clinical and financial records. Design Retrospective study, propensity-matched groups with one-to-one nearest neighbor matching. Setting University hospital, a tertiary care center. Participants Two thousand eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2007 to March 2012. Interventions One hundred forty-one matched pairs were created and analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Robotic CABG was associated with a decrease in operative time (5.61±1.1 v 6.6±1.15 hours, p",
keywords = "CABG, coronary stent, healthcare costs, minimally invasive surgery, PCI, robotic surgery",
author = "Galina Leyvi and Schechter, {Clyde B.} and Sankalp Sehgal and Greenberg, {Mark A.} and Max Snyder and Forest, {Stephen J.} and Alec Mais and Nan Wang and Patrice Deleo and Joseph DeRose",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "12--18",
journal = "Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia",
issn = "1053-0770",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG

T2 - Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

AU - Leyvi, Galina

AU - Schechter, Clyde B.

AU - Sehgal, Sankalp

AU - Greenberg, Mark A.

AU - Snyder, Max

AU - Forest, Stephen J.

AU - Mais, Alec

AU - Wang, Nan

AU - Deleo, Patrice

AU - DeRose, Joseph

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objectives To compare the direct costs of the index hospitalization and 30-day morbidity and mortality incurred during robotic and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution based on hospital clinical and financial records. Design Retrospective study, propensity-matched groups with one-to-one nearest neighbor matching. Setting University hospital, a tertiary care center. Participants Two thousand eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2007 to March 2012. Interventions One hundred forty-one matched pairs were created and analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Robotic CABG was associated with a decrease in operative time (5.61±1.1 v 6.6±1.15 hours, p

AB - Objectives To compare the direct costs of the index hospitalization and 30-day morbidity and mortality incurred during robotic and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution based on hospital clinical and financial records. Design Retrospective study, propensity-matched groups with one-to-one nearest neighbor matching. Setting University hospital, a tertiary care center. Participants Two thousand eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2007 to March 2012. Interventions One hundred forty-one matched pairs were created and analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Robotic CABG was associated with a decrease in operative time (5.61±1.1 v 6.6±1.15 hours, p

KW - CABG

KW - coronary stent

KW - healthcare costs

KW - minimally invasive surgery

KW - PCI

KW - robotic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957849822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957849822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031

DO - 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031

M3 - Article

C2 - 26597467

AN - SCOPUS:84957849822

VL - 30

SP - 12

EP - 18

JO - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

SN - 1053-0770

IS - 1

ER -