Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG

Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

Galina Leyvi, Clyde B. Schechter, Sankalp Sehgal, Mark A. Greenberg, Max Snyder, Stephen J. Forest, Alec Mais, Nan Wang, Patrice Deleo, Joseph DeRose

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives To compare the direct costs of the index hospitalization and 30-day morbidity and mortality incurred during robotic and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution based on hospital clinical and financial records. Design Retrospective study, propensity-matched groups with one-to-one nearest neighbor matching. Setting University hospital, a tertiary care center. Participants Two thousand eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2007 to March 2012. Interventions One hundred forty-one matched pairs were created and analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Robotic CABG was associated with a decrease in operative time (5.61±1.1 v 6.6±1.15 hours, p

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-18
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Robotics
Coronary Artery Bypass
Hospitalization
Costs and Cost Analysis
Operative Time
Tertiary Care Centers
Research Design
Retrospective Studies
Morbidity
Mortality

Keywords

  • CABG
  • coronary stent
  • healthcare costs
  • minimally invasive surgery
  • PCI
  • robotic surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

@article{8fcbebab1854426ba56f2a509371f269,
title = "Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG: Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization",
abstract = "Objectives To compare the direct costs of the index hospitalization and 30-day morbidity and mortality incurred during robotic and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution based on hospital clinical and financial records. Design Retrospective study, propensity-matched groups with one-to-one nearest neighbor matching. Setting University hospital, a tertiary care center. Participants Two thousand eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2007 to March 2012. Interventions One hundred forty-one matched pairs were created and analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Robotic CABG was associated with a decrease in operative time (5.61±1.1 v 6.6±1.15 hours, p",
keywords = "CABG, coronary stent, healthcare costs, minimally invasive surgery, PCI, robotic surgery",
author = "Galina Leyvi and Schechter, {Clyde B.} and Sankalp Sehgal and Greenberg, {Mark A.} and Max Snyder and Forest, {Stephen J.} and Alec Mais and Nan Wang and Patrice Deleo and Joseph DeRose",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "12--18",
journal = "Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia",
issn = "1053-0770",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Index Hospitalization Costs between Robotic CABG and Conventional CABG

T2 - Implications for Hybrid Coronary Revascularization

AU - Leyvi, Galina

AU - Schechter, Clyde B.

AU - Sehgal, Sankalp

AU - Greenberg, Mark A.

AU - Snyder, Max

AU - Forest, Stephen J.

AU - Mais, Alec

AU - Wang, Nan

AU - Deleo, Patrice

AU - DeRose, Joseph

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Objectives To compare the direct costs of the index hospitalization and 30-day morbidity and mortality incurred during robotic and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution based on hospital clinical and financial records. Design Retrospective study, propensity-matched groups with one-to-one nearest neighbor matching. Setting University hospital, a tertiary care center. Participants Two thousand eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2007 to March 2012. Interventions One hundred forty-one matched pairs were created and analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Robotic CABG was associated with a decrease in operative time (5.61±1.1 v 6.6±1.15 hours, p

AB - Objectives To compare the direct costs of the index hospitalization and 30-day morbidity and mortality incurred during robotic and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting at a single institution based on hospital clinical and financial records. Design Retrospective study, propensity-matched groups with one-to-one nearest neighbor matching. Setting University hospital, a tertiary care center. Participants Two thousand eighty-eight consecutive patients who underwent primary coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) from January 2007 to March 2012. Interventions One hundred forty-one matched pairs were created and analyzed. Measurements and Main Results Robotic CABG was associated with a decrease in operative time (5.61±1.1 v 6.6±1.15 hours, p

KW - CABG

KW - coronary stent

KW - healthcare costs

KW - minimally invasive surgery

KW - PCI

KW - robotic surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957849822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84957849822&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031

DO - 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.07.031

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 12

EP - 18

JO - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

JF - Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

SN - 1053-0770

IS - 1

ER -