Comparison of endoscopic sinus surgery with and without image guidance

Marvin P. Fried, Vik M. Moharir, Jennifer Shin, Marta Taylor-Becker, Paul Morrison

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Image guidance based on preacquired computed tomography scans of the patient is a technique used to assist the physician during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). This study seeks to compare ESS with and without image guidance, analyzing a number of parameters that can impact on efficacy. Methods: Retrospective chart review took place at a tertiary care referral center. The study group consisted of 97 consecutive patients confirmed to have undergone ESS using an electromagnetic intraoperative image guidance system (IGS). The control group consisted of 61 consecutive patients who underwent ESS, before the IGS was available at the study hospital. The main outcomes measured were analysis of patient profile, including coexisting conditions such as asthma and polyposis, assessment of which specific sinuses underwent surgical treatment; major and minor complications; estimated blood loss (EBL); operative time; and the need for repeat surgery. Results: The IGS group had 74% of patients with polyposis; more sinuses, on average, which underwent surgical revision; one major and three minor complications; an average EBL of 134 cc, an average procedure time of 154 minutes; and one patient who needed repeat surgery in a 3-month follow-up period. The non-IGS group had 40% of patients with polyposis; seven major complications and one minor complication; an average EBL of 94 cc; and three patients who needed repeat surgery within 3 months. Conclusions: The use of an IGS for endoscopic sinus surgery may reduce the complications associated with the procedure and allow for a more thorough operation. However, operative time and EBL may be increased.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-197
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Rhinology
Volume16
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 2002

Fingerprint

Reoperation
Operative Time
Tertiary Care Centers
Electromagnetic Phenomena
Asthma
Tomography
Physicians
Control Groups
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Fried, M. P., Moharir, V. M., Shin, J., Taylor-Becker, M., & Morrison, P. (2002). Comparison of endoscopic sinus surgery with and without image guidance. American Journal of Rhinology, 16(4), 193-197.

Comparison of endoscopic sinus surgery with and without image guidance. / Fried, Marvin P.; Moharir, Vik M.; Shin, Jennifer; Taylor-Becker, Marta; Morrison, Paul.

In: American Journal of Rhinology, Vol. 16, No. 4, 07.2002, p. 193-197.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fried, MP, Moharir, VM, Shin, J, Taylor-Becker, M & Morrison, P 2002, 'Comparison of endoscopic sinus surgery with and without image guidance', American Journal of Rhinology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 193-197.
Fried MP, Moharir VM, Shin J, Taylor-Becker M, Morrison P. Comparison of endoscopic sinus surgery with and without image guidance. American Journal of Rhinology. 2002 Jul;16(4):193-197.
Fried, Marvin P. ; Moharir, Vik M. ; Shin, Jennifer ; Taylor-Becker, Marta ; Morrison, Paul. / Comparison of endoscopic sinus surgery with and without image guidance. In: American Journal of Rhinology. 2002 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 193-197.
@article{03e826d877324542b09bb12e4c80c19e,
title = "Comparison of endoscopic sinus surgery with and without image guidance",
abstract = "Background: Image guidance based on preacquired computed tomography scans of the patient is a technique used to assist the physician during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). This study seeks to compare ESS with and without image guidance, analyzing a number of parameters that can impact on efficacy. Methods: Retrospective chart review took place at a tertiary care referral center. The study group consisted of 97 consecutive patients confirmed to have undergone ESS using an electromagnetic intraoperative image guidance system (IGS). The control group consisted of 61 consecutive patients who underwent ESS, before the IGS was available at the study hospital. The main outcomes measured were analysis of patient profile, including coexisting conditions such as asthma and polyposis, assessment of which specific sinuses underwent surgical treatment; major and minor complications; estimated blood loss (EBL); operative time; and the need for repeat surgery. Results: The IGS group had 74{\%} of patients with polyposis; more sinuses, on average, which underwent surgical revision; one major and three minor complications; an average EBL of 134 cc, an average procedure time of 154 minutes; and one patient who needed repeat surgery in a 3-month follow-up period. The non-IGS group had 40{\%} of patients with polyposis; seven major complications and one minor complication; an average EBL of 94 cc; and three patients who needed repeat surgery within 3 months. Conclusions: The use of an IGS for endoscopic sinus surgery may reduce the complications associated with the procedure and allow for a more thorough operation. However, operative time and EBL may be increased.",
author = "Fried, {Marvin P.} and Moharir, {Vik M.} and Jennifer Shin and Marta Taylor-Becker and Paul Morrison",
year = "2002",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "193--197",
journal = "American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy",
issn = "1945-8924",
publisher = "OceanSide Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of endoscopic sinus surgery with and without image guidance

AU - Fried, Marvin P.

AU - Moharir, Vik M.

AU - Shin, Jennifer

AU - Taylor-Becker, Marta

AU - Morrison, Paul

PY - 2002/7

Y1 - 2002/7

N2 - Background: Image guidance based on preacquired computed tomography scans of the patient is a technique used to assist the physician during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). This study seeks to compare ESS with and without image guidance, analyzing a number of parameters that can impact on efficacy. Methods: Retrospective chart review took place at a tertiary care referral center. The study group consisted of 97 consecutive patients confirmed to have undergone ESS using an electromagnetic intraoperative image guidance system (IGS). The control group consisted of 61 consecutive patients who underwent ESS, before the IGS was available at the study hospital. The main outcomes measured were analysis of patient profile, including coexisting conditions such as asthma and polyposis, assessment of which specific sinuses underwent surgical treatment; major and minor complications; estimated blood loss (EBL); operative time; and the need for repeat surgery. Results: The IGS group had 74% of patients with polyposis; more sinuses, on average, which underwent surgical revision; one major and three minor complications; an average EBL of 134 cc, an average procedure time of 154 minutes; and one patient who needed repeat surgery in a 3-month follow-up period. The non-IGS group had 40% of patients with polyposis; seven major complications and one minor complication; an average EBL of 94 cc; and three patients who needed repeat surgery within 3 months. Conclusions: The use of an IGS for endoscopic sinus surgery may reduce the complications associated with the procedure and allow for a more thorough operation. However, operative time and EBL may be increased.

AB - Background: Image guidance based on preacquired computed tomography scans of the patient is a technique used to assist the physician during endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). This study seeks to compare ESS with and without image guidance, analyzing a number of parameters that can impact on efficacy. Methods: Retrospective chart review took place at a tertiary care referral center. The study group consisted of 97 consecutive patients confirmed to have undergone ESS using an electromagnetic intraoperative image guidance system (IGS). The control group consisted of 61 consecutive patients who underwent ESS, before the IGS was available at the study hospital. The main outcomes measured were analysis of patient profile, including coexisting conditions such as asthma and polyposis, assessment of which specific sinuses underwent surgical treatment; major and minor complications; estimated blood loss (EBL); operative time; and the need for repeat surgery. Results: The IGS group had 74% of patients with polyposis; more sinuses, on average, which underwent surgical revision; one major and three minor complications; an average EBL of 134 cc, an average procedure time of 154 minutes; and one patient who needed repeat surgery in a 3-month follow-up period. The non-IGS group had 40% of patients with polyposis; seven major complications and one minor complication; an average EBL of 94 cc; and three patients who needed repeat surgery within 3 months. Conclusions: The use of an IGS for endoscopic sinus surgery may reduce the complications associated with the procedure and allow for a more thorough operation. However, operative time and EBL may be increased.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036656060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036656060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12222943

AN - SCOPUS:0036656060

VL - 16

SP - 193

EP - 197

JO - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

JF - American Journal of Rhinology and Allergy

SN - 1945-8924

IS - 4

ER -