Comparison of CT and fluoroscopic guidance for lumbar puncture in an obese population with prior failed unguided attempt

Andrew D. Brook, Judah Burns, Edward Dauer, Alan H. Schoendfeld, Todd S. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and purpose: In the past 50 years, fluoroscopic guidance has been used to improve upon lumbar puncture (LP) technique that was unchanged for over a century. Recently, CT has seen increasing use as a guidance modality due to its ability to demonstrate soft tissue contrast and provide millimeter accuracy with needle targeting. This study compared procedure time and radiation dosages for fluoroscopic and CT guided LP. Materials and methods: This institutional review board and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant study was a retrospective review of a consecutive cohort referred for image guided LP. For CT, 45 patients aged 49 years (range 20-78, SD 14) with body mass index (BMI) values of 33 kg/m2 (range 20-50, SD 12) were included. For fluoroscopy, 100 patients aged 47 years (range 18-88, SD 17) with BMI values of 29 kg/m2 (range 15-56, SD 9) were included. CT procedure time was determined using picture archiving and communication system (PACS) image time stamps. Radiation dose was determined using the CT dose report and effective dose conversion factors. Fluoroscopic procedure time was determined from nursing. Fluoroscopic radiation dose was calculated from dose-area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy times, with effective dosage calculated using simulation software. Results: For CT, procedure time average was 14 min (range 5-42, SD 8.5). Average dose-length product was 120 mGy×cm (range 39-211, SD 43) and average effective dose was 1.98 mSv (range 0.2-8.18, SD 4.4). For fluoroscopy, procedure time averaged 12 min (range 12-30, SD 6). Average DAP was 10 Gy×cm2 (range 0.1-70, SD 11) and effective dose estimate averaged 2.9 mSv (range 0.9-9.4, SD 1.9). There were no unsuccessful taps or complications. Conclusions: Both fluoroscopic and CT guidance may be used to perform an LP in an obese population with a short procedure time and low radiation dose.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)324-328
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Spinal Puncture
Population
Fluoroscopy
Radiation
Body Mass Index
Radiology Information Systems
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Radiation Dosage
Research Ethics Committees
Needles
Nursing
Software

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Comparison of CT and fluoroscopic guidance for lumbar puncture in an obese population with prior failed unguided attempt. / Brook, Andrew D.; Burns, Judah; Dauer, Edward; Schoendfeld, Alan H.; Miller, Todd S.

In: Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2014, p. 324-328.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brook, Andrew D. ; Burns, Judah ; Dauer, Edward ; Schoendfeld, Alan H. ; Miller, Todd S. / Comparison of CT and fluoroscopic guidance for lumbar puncture in an obese population with prior failed unguided attempt. In: Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 324-328.
@article{f3b34b5a58f6486d9df3cb0043c44473,
title = "Comparison of CT and fluoroscopic guidance for lumbar puncture in an obese population with prior failed unguided attempt",
abstract = "Background and purpose: In the past 50 years, fluoroscopic guidance has been used to improve upon lumbar puncture (LP) technique that was unchanged for over a century. Recently, CT has seen increasing use as a guidance modality due to its ability to demonstrate soft tissue contrast and provide millimeter accuracy with needle targeting. This study compared procedure time and radiation dosages for fluoroscopic and CT guided LP. Materials and methods: This institutional review board and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant study was a retrospective review of a consecutive cohort referred for image guided LP. For CT, 45 patients aged 49 years (range 20-78, SD 14) with body mass index (BMI) values of 33 kg/m2 (range 20-50, SD 12) were included. For fluoroscopy, 100 patients aged 47 years (range 18-88, SD 17) with BMI values of 29 kg/m2 (range 15-56, SD 9) were included. CT procedure time was determined using picture archiving and communication system (PACS) image time stamps. Radiation dose was determined using the CT dose report and effective dose conversion factors. Fluoroscopic procedure time was determined from nursing. Fluoroscopic radiation dose was calculated from dose-area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy times, with effective dosage calculated using simulation software. Results: For CT, procedure time average was 14 min (range 5-42, SD 8.5). Average dose-length product was 120 mGy×cm (range 39-211, SD 43) and average effective dose was 1.98 mSv (range 0.2-8.18, SD 4.4). For fluoroscopy, procedure time averaged 12 min (range 12-30, SD 6). Average DAP was 10 Gy×cm2 (range 0.1-70, SD 11) and effective dose estimate averaged 2.9 mSv (range 0.9-9.4, SD 1.9). There were no unsuccessful taps or complications. Conclusions: Both fluoroscopic and CT guidance may be used to perform an LP in an obese population with a short procedure time and low radiation dose.",
author = "Brook, {Andrew D.} and Judah Burns and Edward Dauer and Schoendfeld, {Alan H.} and Miller, {Todd S.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010745",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "324--328",
journal = "Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery",
issn = "1759-8478",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of CT and fluoroscopic guidance for lumbar puncture in an obese population with prior failed unguided attempt

AU - Brook, Andrew D.

AU - Burns, Judah

AU - Dauer, Edward

AU - Schoendfeld, Alan H.

AU - Miller, Todd S.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Background and purpose: In the past 50 years, fluoroscopic guidance has been used to improve upon lumbar puncture (LP) technique that was unchanged for over a century. Recently, CT has seen increasing use as a guidance modality due to its ability to demonstrate soft tissue contrast and provide millimeter accuracy with needle targeting. This study compared procedure time and radiation dosages for fluoroscopic and CT guided LP. Materials and methods: This institutional review board and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant study was a retrospective review of a consecutive cohort referred for image guided LP. For CT, 45 patients aged 49 years (range 20-78, SD 14) with body mass index (BMI) values of 33 kg/m2 (range 20-50, SD 12) were included. For fluoroscopy, 100 patients aged 47 years (range 18-88, SD 17) with BMI values of 29 kg/m2 (range 15-56, SD 9) were included. CT procedure time was determined using picture archiving and communication system (PACS) image time stamps. Radiation dose was determined using the CT dose report and effective dose conversion factors. Fluoroscopic procedure time was determined from nursing. Fluoroscopic radiation dose was calculated from dose-area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy times, with effective dosage calculated using simulation software. Results: For CT, procedure time average was 14 min (range 5-42, SD 8.5). Average dose-length product was 120 mGy×cm (range 39-211, SD 43) and average effective dose was 1.98 mSv (range 0.2-8.18, SD 4.4). For fluoroscopy, procedure time averaged 12 min (range 12-30, SD 6). Average DAP was 10 Gy×cm2 (range 0.1-70, SD 11) and effective dose estimate averaged 2.9 mSv (range 0.9-9.4, SD 1.9). There were no unsuccessful taps or complications. Conclusions: Both fluoroscopic and CT guidance may be used to perform an LP in an obese population with a short procedure time and low radiation dose.

AB - Background and purpose: In the past 50 years, fluoroscopic guidance has been used to improve upon lumbar puncture (LP) technique that was unchanged for over a century. Recently, CT has seen increasing use as a guidance modality due to its ability to demonstrate soft tissue contrast and provide millimeter accuracy with needle targeting. This study compared procedure time and radiation dosages for fluoroscopic and CT guided LP. Materials and methods: This institutional review board and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant study was a retrospective review of a consecutive cohort referred for image guided LP. For CT, 45 patients aged 49 years (range 20-78, SD 14) with body mass index (BMI) values of 33 kg/m2 (range 20-50, SD 12) were included. For fluoroscopy, 100 patients aged 47 years (range 18-88, SD 17) with BMI values of 29 kg/m2 (range 15-56, SD 9) were included. CT procedure time was determined using picture archiving and communication system (PACS) image time stamps. Radiation dose was determined using the CT dose report and effective dose conversion factors. Fluoroscopic procedure time was determined from nursing. Fluoroscopic radiation dose was calculated from dose-area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy times, with effective dosage calculated using simulation software. Results: For CT, procedure time average was 14 min (range 5-42, SD 8.5). Average dose-length product was 120 mGy×cm (range 39-211, SD 43) and average effective dose was 1.98 mSv (range 0.2-8.18, SD 4.4). For fluoroscopy, procedure time averaged 12 min (range 12-30, SD 6). Average DAP was 10 Gy×cm2 (range 0.1-70, SD 11) and effective dose estimate averaged 2.9 mSv (range 0.9-9.4, SD 1.9). There were no unsuccessful taps or complications. Conclusions: Both fluoroscopic and CT guidance may be used to perform an LP in an obese population with a short procedure time and low radiation dose.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899653905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899653905&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010745

DO - 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010745

M3 - Article

C2 - 23729498

AN - SCOPUS:84899653905

VL - 6

SP - 324

EP - 328

JO - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

JF - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

SN - 1759-8478

IS - 4

ER -