Comparing McRoberts' and Rubin's maneuvers for initial management of shoulder dystocia: An objective evaluation

Edith D. Gurewitsch Allen, Esther J. Kim, Jason H. Yang, Katherine E. Outland, Mary K. McDonald, Robert H. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was undertaken to objectively compare delivery traction force, fetal neck rotation, and brachial plexus elongation after 3 different initial shoulder dystocia maneuvers: McRoberts', anterior Rubin's, and posterior Rubin's. We developed a laboratory birthing simulator comprised of a maternal model with a 3-dimensional bony pelvis, an instrumented fetal model, a force-sensing glove, and a computer-based data acquisition system. A single operator performed 30 simulated shoulder dystocia deliveries using standard downward traction after 1 maneuver was performed. Ten deliveries simulated McRoberts' maneuver with fetal shoulders in the anteroposterior diameter. Ten deliveries involved approximately 30-degree oblique rotation of the anterior shoulder with the spine oriented anteriorly (anterior Rubin's maneuver). Ten deliveries involved approximately 30-degree rotation of the posterior shoulder to the opposite oblique pelvic diameter, with the spine oriented posteriorly (posterior Rubin's maneuver). Peak traction force, brachial plexus elongation, and neck rotation were compared between groups using analysis of variance, with P < .05 considered significant. Rubin's maneuvers were found to require less traction force than McRoberts': 16.2 ± 2.1 lbs for McRoberts' compared with 8.8 ± 2.2 lbs and 6.5 ± 1.8 lbs for posterior and anterior Rubin's respectively (P < .0001). Brachial plexus extension was significantly lower after anterior Rubin's maneuver compared with McRoberts' or posterior Rubin's maneuvers. In a laboratory model of initial maneuvers for shoulder dystocia, anterior Rubin's maneuver requires the least traction for delivery and produces the least amount of brachial plexus tension. Further study is needed to validate these results clinically.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-160
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume192
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dystocia
Traction
Brachial Plexus
Spine
Neck
Pelvis
Information Systems
Analysis of Variance
Mothers

Keywords

  • Birth trauma
  • Brachial plexus
  • Injury prevention
  • Laboratory model
  • McRoberts' maneuver
  • Rotation
  • Rubin's maneuver
  • Shoulder dystocia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Comparing McRoberts' and Rubin's maneuvers for initial management of shoulder dystocia : An objective evaluation. / Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D.; Kim, Esther J.; Yang, Jason H.; Outland, Katherine E.; McDonald, Mary K.; Allen, Robert H.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 192, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 153-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D. ; Kim, Esther J. ; Yang, Jason H. ; Outland, Katherine E. ; McDonald, Mary K. ; Allen, Robert H. / Comparing McRoberts' and Rubin's maneuvers for initial management of shoulder dystocia : An objective evaluation. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005 ; Vol. 192, No. 1. pp. 153-160.
@article{bb8efa9cad944d96b5ed231959d7ae19,
title = "Comparing McRoberts' and Rubin's maneuvers for initial management of shoulder dystocia: An objective evaluation",
abstract = "This study was undertaken to objectively compare delivery traction force, fetal neck rotation, and brachial plexus elongation after 3 different initial shoulder dystocia maneuvers: McRoberts', anterior Rubin's, and posterior Rubin's. We developed a laboratory birthing simulator comprised of a maternal model with a 3-dimensional bony pelvis, an instrumented fetal model, a force-sensing glove, and a computer-based data acquisition system. A single operator performed 30 simulated shoulder dystocia deliveries using standard downward traction after 1 maneuver was performed. Ten deliveries simulated McRoberts' maneuver with fetal shoulders in the anteroposterior diameter. Ten deliveries involved approximately 30-degree oblique rotation of the anterior shoulder with the spine oriented anteriorly (anterior Rubin's maneuver). Ten deliveries involved approximately 30-degree rotation of the posterior shoulder to the opposite oblique pelvic diameter, with the spine oriented posteriorly (posterior Rubin's maneuver). Peak traction force, brachial plexus elongation, and neck rotation were compared between groups using analysis of variance, with P < .05 considered significant. Rubin's maneuvers were found to require less traction force than McRoberts': 16.2 ± 2.1 lbs for McRoberts' compared with 8.8 ± 2.2 lbs and 6.5 ± 1.8 lbs for posterior and anterior Rubin's respectively (P < .0001). Brachial plexus extension was significantly lower after anterior Rubin's maneuver compared with McRoberts' or posterior Rubin's maneuvers. In a laboratory model of initial maneuvers for shoulder dystocia, anterior Rubin's maneuver requires the least traction for delivery and produces the least amount of brachial plexus tension. Further study is needed to validate these results clinically.",
keywords = "Birth trauma, Brachial plexus, Injury prevention, Laboratory model, McRoberts' maneuver, Rotation, Rubin's maneuver, Shoulder dystocia",
author = "{Gurewitsch Allen}, {Edith D.} and Kim, {Esther J.} and Yang, {Jason H.} and Outland, {Katherine E.} and McDonald, {Mary K.} and Allen, {Robert H.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.055",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "192",
pages = "153--160",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing McRoberts' and Rubin's maneuvers for initial management of shoulder dystocia

T2 - An objective evaluation

AU - Gurewitsch Allen, Edith D.

AU - Kim, Esther J.

AU - Yang, Jason H.

AU - Outland, Katherine E.

AU - McDonald, Mary K.

AU - Allen, Robert H.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - This study was undertaken to objectively compare delivery traction force, fetal neck rotation, and brachial plexus elongation after 3 different initial shoulder dystocia maneuvers: McRoberts', anterior Rubin's, and posterior Rubin's. We developed a laboratory birthing simulator comprised of a maternal model with a 3-dimensional bony pelvis, an instrumented fetal model, a force-sensing glove, and a computer-based data acquisition system. A single operator performed 30 simulated shoulder dystocia deliveries using standard downward traction after 1 maneuver was performed. Ten deliveries simulated McRoberts' maneuver with fetal shoulders in the anteroposterior diameter. Ten deliveries involved approximately 30-degree oblique rotation of the anterior shoulder with the spine oriented anteriorly (anterior Rubin's maneuver). Ten deliveries involved approximately 30-degree rotation of the posterior shoulder to the opposite oblique pelvic diameter, with the spine oriented posteriorly (posterior Rubin's maneuver). Peak traction force, brachial plexus elongation, and neck rotation were compared between groups using analysis of variance, with P < .05 considered significant. Rubin's maneuvers were found to require less traction force than McRoberts': 16.2 ± 2.1 lbs for McRoberts' compared with 8.8 ± 2.2 lbs and 6.5 ± 1.8 lbs for posterior and anterior Rubin's respectively (P < .0001). Brachial plexus extension was significantly lower after anterior Rubin's maneuver compared with McRoberts' or posterior Rubin's maneuvers. In a laboratory model of initial maneuvers for shoulder dystocia, anterior Rubin's maneuver requires the least traction for delivery and produces the least amount of brachial plexus tension. Further study is needed to validate these results clinically.

AB - This study was undertaken to objectively compare delivery traction force, fetal neck rotation, and brachial plexus elongation after 3 different initial shoulder dystocia maneuvers: McRoberts', anterior Rubin's, and posterior Rubin's. We developed a laboratory birthing simulator comprised of a maternal model with a 3-dimensional bony pelvis, an instrumented fetal model, a force-sensing glove, and a computer-based data acquisition system. A single operator performed 30 simulated shoulder dystocia deliveries using standard downward traction after 1 maneuver was performed. Ten deliveries simulated McRoberts' maneuver with fetal shoulders in the anteroposterior diameter. Ten deliveries involved approximately 30-degree oblique rotation of the anterior shoulder with the spine oriented anteriorly (anterior Rubin's maneuver). Ten deliveries involved approximately 30-degree rotation of the posterior shoulder to the opposite oblique pelvic diameter, with the spine oriented posteriorly (posterior Rubin's maneuver). Peak traction force, brachial plexus elongation, and neck rotation were compared between groups using analysis of variance, with P < .05 considered significant. Rubin's maneuvers were found to require less traction force than McRoberts': 16.2 ± 2.1 lbs for McRoberts' compared with 8.8 ± 2.2 lbs and 6.5 ± 1.8 lbs for posterior and anterior Rubin's respectively (P < .0001). Brachial plexus extension was significantly lower after anterior Rubin's maneuver compared with McRoberts' or posterior Rubin's maneuvers. In a laboratory model of initial maneuvers for shoulder dystocia, anterior Rubin's maneuver requires the least traction for delivery and produces the least amount of brachial plexus tension. Further study is needed to validate these results clinically.

KW - Birth trauma

KW - Brachial plexus

KW - Injury prevention

KW - Laboratory model

KW - McRoberts' maneuver

KW - Rotation

KW - Rubin's maneuver

KW - Shoulder dystocia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12844259700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12844259700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.055

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.055

M3 - Article

C2 - 15672018

AN - SCOPUS:12844259700

VL - 192

SP - 153

EP - 160

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 1

ER -