Community experiences and perceptions of clinical and translational research and researchers

Jeannine S. Skinner, Neely A. Williams, Richmond Al Richmond, Jen Brown, Alvin H. Strelnick, Karen Calhoun, E. Hill De Loney, Shauntice Allen, Alex Pirie, Consuelo H. Wilkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Engaging communities in research is increasingly recognized as critical to translation of research into improved health outcomes. Our objective was to understand community stakeholders’ perspectives on researchers, academic institutions, and how community is valued in research. Methods: A 45-item survey assessing experiences and perceptions of research (trust, community value, equity, researcher preparedness, and indicators of successful engage-ment) was distributed to 226 community members involved in health research with academic institutions. Results: Of the 109 respondents, 60% were racial/ethnic minorities and 78% were women, representing a range of community organizations, faith-based organizations, and public health agencies. Most (57%) reported current involvement with a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA). Only 25% viewed researchers as well-prepared to engage communities and few (13%) reported that resources were available and adequate to support community involvement. Most community stakeholders (66%) were compensated for their involvement in research, but only 40% perceived compensation to be appropriate. Trust of research and perceptions that researchers value community were more positive among those who perceived their compensation as appropriate (P = .001). Conclusions: Appropriate compensation and resources to support community involvement in research may improve perceptions of trust and value in academic–community partnerships. Strategies are needed to increase researcher preparedness to engage with communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-271
Number of pages9
JournalProgress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Translational Medical Research
Research Personnel
community
experience
Research
Organizations
stakeholder
Health
Values
health
resources
Public Health
national minority
faith
equity
public health

Keywords

  • Community engagement
  • Partnerships
  • Research perceptions
  • Trust
  • Value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Community experiences and perceptions of clinical and translational research and researchers. / Skinner, Jeannine S.; Williams, Neely A.; Al Richmond, Richmond; Brown, Jen; Strelnick, Alvin H.; Calhoun, Karen; Hill De Loney, E.; Allen, Shauntice; Pirie, Alex; Wilkins, Consuelo H.

In: Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 263-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Skinner, JS, Williams, NA, Al Richmond, R, Brown, J, Strelnick, AH, Calhoun, K, Hill De Loney, E, Allen, S, Pirie, A & Wilkins, CH 2018, 'Community experiences and perceptions of clinical and translational research and researchers', Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 263-271. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2018.0050
Skinner, Jeannine S. ; Williams, Neely A. ; Al Richmond, Richmond ; Brown, Jen ; Strelnick, Alvin H. ; Calhoun, Karen ; Hill De Loney, E. ; Allen, Shauntice ; Pirie, Alex ; Wilkins, Consuelo H. / Community experiences and perceptions of clinical and translational research and researchers. In: Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action. 2018 ; Vol. 12, No. 3. pp. 263-271.
@article{123ad1fe4eb74e6cbaedb2a0085a4e81,
title = "Community experiences and perceptions of clinical and translational research and researchers",
abstract = "Background: Engaging communities in research is increasingly recognized as critical to translation of research into improved health outcomes. Our objective was to understand community stakeholders’ perspectives on researchers, academic institutions, and how community is valued in research. Methods: A 45-item survey assessing experiences and perceptions of research (trust, community value, equity, researcher preparedness, and indicators of successful engage-ment) was distributed to 226 community members involved in health research with academic institutions. Results: Of the 109 respondents, 60{\%} were racial/ethnic minorities and 78{\%} were women, representing a range of community organizations, faith-based organizations, and public health agencies. Most (57{\%}) reported current involvement with a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA). Only 25{\%} viewed researchers as well-prepared to engage communities and few (13{\%}) reported that resources were available and adequate to support community involvement. Most community stakeholders (66{\%}) were compensated for their involvement in research, but only 40{\%} perceived compensation to be appropriate. Trust of research and perceptions that researchers value community were more positive among those who perceived their compensation as appropriate (P = .001). Conclusions: Appropriate compensation and resources to support community involvement in research may improve perceptions of trust and value in academic–community partnerships. Strategies are needed to increase researcher preparedness to engage with communities.",
keywords = "Community engagement, Partnerships, Research perceptions, Trust, Value",
author = "Skinner, {Jeannine S.} and Williams, {Neely A.} and {Al Richmond}, Richmond and Jen Brown and Strelnick, {Alvin H.} and Karen Calhoun and {Hill De Loney}, E. and Shauntice Allen and Alex Pirie and Wilkins, {Consuelo H.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/cpr.2018.0050",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "263--271",
journal = "Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action",
issn = "1557-0541",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Community experiences and perceptions of clinical and translational research and researchers

AU - Skinner, Jeannine S.

AU - Williams, Neely A.

AU - Al Richmond, Richmond

AU - Brown, Jen

AU - Strelnick, Alvin H.

AU - Calhoun, Karen

AU - Hill De Loney, E.

AU - Allen, Shauntice

AU - Pirie, Alex

AU - Wilkins, Consuelo H.

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Background: Engaging communities in research is increasingly recognized as critical to translation of research into improved health outcomes. Our objective was to understand community stakeholders’ perspectives on researchers, academic institutions, and how community is valued in research. Methods: A 45-item survey assessing experiences and perceptions of research (trust, community value, equity, researcher preparedness, and indicators of successful engage-ment) was distributed to 226 community members involved in health research with academic institutions. Results: Of the 109 respondents, 60% were racial/ethnic minorities and 78% were women, representing a range of community organizations, faith-based organizations, and public health agencies. Most (57%) reported current involvement with a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA). Only 25% viewed researchers as well-prepared to engage communities and few (13%) reported that resources were available and adequate to support community involvement. Most community stakeholders (66%) were compensated for their involvement in research, but only 40% perceived compensation to be appropriate. Trust of research and perceptions that researchers value community were more positive among those who perceived their compensation as appropriate (P = .001). Conclusions: Appropriate compensation and resources to support community involvement in research may improve perceptions of trust and value in academic–community partnerships. Strategies are needed to increase researcher preparedness to engage with communities.

AB - Background: Engaging communities in research is increasingly recognized as critical to translation of research into improved health outcomes. Our objective was to understand community stakeholders’ perspectives on researchers, academic institutions, and how community is valued in research. Methods: A 45-item survey assessing experiences and perceptions of research (trust, community value, equity, researcher preparedness, and indicators of successful engage-ment) was distributed to 226 community members involved in health research with academic institutions. Results: Of the 109 respondents, 60% were racial/ethnic minorities and 78% were women, representing a range of community organizations, faith-based organizations, and public health agencies. Most (57%) reported current involvement with a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA). Only 25% viewed researchers as well-prepared to engage communities and few (13%) reported that resources were available and adequate to support community involvement. Most community stakeholders (66%) were compensated for their involvement in research, but only 40% perceived compensation to be appropriate. Trust of research and perceptions that researchers value community were more positive among those who perceived their compensation as appropriate (P = .001). Conclusions: Appropriate compensation and resources to support community involvement in research may improve perceptions of trust and value in academic–community partnerships. Strategies are needed to increase researcher preparedness to engage with communities.

KW - Community engagement

KW - Partnerships

KW - Research perceptions

KW - Trust

KW - Value

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058912115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058912115&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/cpr.2018.0050

DO - 10.1353/cpr.2018.0050

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 263

EP - 271

JO - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action

JF - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action

SN - 1557-0541

IS - 3

ER -