Cogmed Working Memory Training for Youth with ADHD: A Closer Examination of Efficacy Utilizing Evidence-Based Criteria

Anil Chacko, Nicole Feirsen, Anne Claude Bedard, David Marks, Jodi Z. Uderman, Alyssa Chimiklis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

57 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current review applied the evidence-based treatment criteria espoused by the Society for Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (Silverman & Hinshaw, 2008) to specifically evaluate the short-term and longer term efficacy of Cogmed Working Memory Training (CWMT) as a treatment for youth with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Utilizing a systematic literature search, 7 studies that employed the school-age version of CWMT were identified for this review. The data reviewed herein suggest mixed findings regarding the benefit of CWMT for youth with ADHD. Two randomized controlled studies have demonstrated that CWMT led to improvements in neuropsychological outcomes and parent-rated ADHD symptoms relative to wait-list control and placebo treatment conditions. Another study demonstrated effects of CWMT relative to a placebo condition on an analog observation of behavior during an academic task, although this study did not find an effect of CWMT on parent-rated ADHD. Finally, an additional study utilizing an active comparison control condition did not find incremental benefits of CWMT on parent- or teacher-rated ADHD. Critical issues in interpreting existing studies include lack of alignment between demonstrated outcomes and the hypothesized model of therapeutic benefit of CWMT, issues with equivalence of control conditions, and individual differences that may moderate treatment response. Collectively, the strengths and limitations of the studies reviewed suggest that CWMT is best defined as a Possibly Efficacious Treatment for youth with ADHD. We suggest future directions for research and conclude with clinical implications of our findings for the treatment of youth with ADHD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)769-783
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Short-Term Memory
Learning
Therapeutics
Adolescent Psychology
Placebos
Child Psychology
Clinical Psychology
Individuality
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Cogmed Working Memory Training for Youth with ADHD : A Closer Examination of Efficacy Utilizing Evidence-Based Criteria. / Chacko, Anil; Feirsen, Nicole; Bedard, Anne Claude; Marks, David; Uderman, Jodi Z.; Chimiklis, Alyssa.

In: Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Vol. 42, No. 6, 01.11.2013, p. 769-783.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chacko, Anil ; Feirsen, Nicole ; Bedard, Anne Claude ; Marks, David ; Uderman, Jodi Z. ; Chimiklis, Alyssa. / Cogmed Working Memory Training for Youth with ADHD : A Closer Examination of Efficacy Utilizing Evidence-Based Criteria. In: Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 42, No. 6. pp. 769-783.
@article{a317b55f7d7246f798d15c6d93cfe2de,
title = "Cogmed Working Memory Training for Youth with ADHD: A Closer Examination of Efficacy Utilizing Evidence-Based Criteria",
abstract = "The current review applied the evidence-based treatment criteria espoused by the Society for Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (Silverman & Hinshaw, 2008) to specifically evaluate the short-term and longer term efficacy of Cogmed Working Memory Training (CWMT) as a treatment for youth with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Utilizing a systematic literature search, 7 studies that employed the school-age version of CWMT were identified for this review. The data reviewed herein suggest mixed findings regarding the benefit of CWMT for youth with ADHD. Two randomized controlled studies have demonstrated that CWMT led to improvements in neuropsychological outcomes and parent-rated ADHD symptoms relative to wait-list control and placebo treatment conditions. Another study demonstrated effects of CWMT relative to a placebo condition on an analog observation of behavior during an academic task, although this study did not find an effect of CWMT on parent-rated ADHD. Finally, an additional study utilizing an active comparison control condition did not find incremental benefits of CWMT on parent- or teacher-rated ADHD. Critical issues in interpreting existing studies include lack of alignment between demonstrated outcomes and the hypothesized model of therapeutic benefit of CWMT, issues with equivalence of control conditions, and individual differences that may moderate treatment response. Collectively, the strengths and limitations of the studies reviewed suggest that CWMT is best defined as a Possibly Efficacious Treatment for youth with ADHD. We suggest future directions for research and conclude with clinical implications of our findings for the treatment of youth with ADHD.",
author = "Anil Chacko and Nicole Feirsen and Bedard, {Anne Claude} and David Marks and Uderman, {Jodi Z.} and Alyssa Chimiklis",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15374416.2013.787622",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "769--783",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology",
issn = "1537-4416",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cogmed Working Memory Training for Youth with ADHD

T2 - A Closer Examination of Efficacy Utilizing Evidence-Based Criteria

AU - Chacko, Anil

AU - Feirsen, Nicole

AU - Bedard, Anne Claude

AU - Marks, David

AU - Uderman, Jodi Z.

AU - Chimiklis, Alyssa

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - The current review applied the evidence-based treatment criteria espoused by the Society for Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (Silverman & Hinshaw, 2008) to specifically evaluate the short-term and longer term efficacy of Cogmed Working Memory Training (CWMT) as a treatment for youth with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Utilizing a systematic literature search, 7 studies that employed the school-age version of CWMT were identified for this review. The data reviewed herein suggest mixed findings regarding the benefit of CWMT for youth with ADHD. Two randomized controlled studies have demonstrated that CWMT led to improvements in neuropsychological outcomes and parent-rated ADHD symptoms relative to wait-list control and placebo treatment conditions. Another study demonstrated effects of CWMT relative to a placebo condition on an analog observation of behavior during an academic task, although this study did not find an effect of CWMT on parent-rated ADHD. Finally, an additional study utilizing an active comparison control condition did not find incremental benefits of CWMT on parent- or teacher-rated ADHD. Critical issues in interpreting existing studies include lack of alignment between demonstrated outcomes and the hypothesized model of therapeutic benefit of CWMT, issues with equivalence of control conditions, and individual differences that may moderate treatment response. Collectively, the strengths and limitations of the studies reviewed suggest that CWMT is best defined as a Possibly Efficacious Treatment for youth with ADHD. We suggest future directions for research and conclude with clinical implications of our findings for the treatment of youth with ADHD.

AB - The current review applied the evidence-based treatment criteria espoused by the Society for Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (Silverman & Hinshaw, 2008) to specifically evaluate the short-term and longer term efficacy of Cogmed Working Memory Training (CWMT) as a treatment for youth with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Utilizing a systematic literature search, 7 studies that employed the school-age version of CWMT were identified for this review. The data reviewed herein suggest mixed findings regarding the benefit of CWMT for youth with ADHD. Two randomized controlled studies have demonstrated that CWMT led to improvements in neuropsychological outcomes and parent-rated ADHD symptoms relative to wait-list control and placebo treatment conditions. Another study demonstrated effects of CWMT relative to a placebo condition on an analog observation of behavior during an academic task, although this study did not find an effect of CWMT on parent-rated ADHD. Finally, an additional study utilizing an active comparison control condition did not find incremental benefits of CWMT on parent- or teacher-rated ADHD. Critical issues in interpreting existing studies include lack of alignment between demonstrated outcomes and the hypothesized model of therapeutic benefit of CWMT, issues with equivalence of control conditions, and individual differences that may moderate treatment response. Collectively, the strengths and limitations of the studies reviewed suggest that CWMT is best defined as a Possibly Efficacious Treatment for youth with ADHD. We suggest future directions for research and conclude with clinical implications of our findings for the treatment of youth with ADHD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887998060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887998060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15374416.2013.787622

DO - 10.1080/15374416.2013.787622

M3 - Article

C2 - 23668397

AN - SCOPUS:84887998060

VL - 42

SP - 769

EP - 783

JO - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

JF - Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology

SN - 1537-4416

IS - 6

ER -