Clinical perspectives on osteogenesis imperfecta versus non-accidental injury

Elaine Maria Pereira

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Although non-accidental injuries (NAI) are more common in cases of unexplained fractures than rare disorders such as osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), ruling out OI and other medical causes of fracture is always indicated. The majority of OI patients can be diagnosed with the help of family history, physical examination, and radiographic findings. In particular, there are a few radiological findings which are seen more commonly in NAI than in OI which may help guide clinician considerations regarding the probability of either of these diagnoses. At the same time, molecular testing still merits careful consideration in cases with unexplained fractures without obvious additional signs of abuse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)302-306
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics
Volume169
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Osteogenesis Imperfecta
Wounds and Injuries
Physical Examination

Keywords

  • Child abuse
  • Non-accidental injury
  • Osteogenesis imperfecta
  • Rib fractures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Clinical perspectives on osteogenesis imperfecta versus non-accidental injury. / Pereira, Elaine Maria.

In: American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, Vol. 169, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 302-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{cd867e59e9434b19a1c4a99e19faef9f,
title = "Clinical perspectives on osteogenesis imperfecta versus non-accidental injury",
abstract = "Although non-accidental injuries (NAI) are more common in cases of unexplained fractures than rare disorders such as osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), ruling out OI and other medical causes of fracture is always indicated. The majority of OI patients can be diagnosed with the help of family history, physical examination, and radiographic findings. In particular, there are a few radiological findings which are seen more commonly in NAI than in OI which may help guide clinician considerations regarding the probability of either of these diagnoses. At the same time, molecular testing still merits careful consideration in cases with unexplained fractures without obvious additional signs of abuse.",
keywords = "Child abuse, Non-accidental injury, Osteogenesis imperfecta, Rib fractures",
author = "Pereira, {Elaine Maria}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ajmg.c.31463",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "169",
pages = "302--306",
journal = "American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A",
issn = "1552-4825",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical perspectives on osteogenesis imperfecta versus non-accidental injury

AU - Pereira, Elaine Maria

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Although non-accidental injuries (NAI) are more common in cases of unexplained fractures than rare disorders such as osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), ruling out OI and other medical causes of fracture is always indicated. The majority of OI patients can be diagnosed with the help of family history, physical examination, and radiographic findings. In particular, there are a few radiological findings which are seen more commonly in NAI than in OI which may help guide clinician considerations regarding the probability of either of these diagnoses. At the same time, molecular testing still merits careful consideration in cases with unexplained fractures without obvious additional signs of abuse.

AB - Although non-accidental injuries (NAI) are more common in cases of unexplained fractures than rare disorders such as osteogenesis imperfecta (OI), ruling out OI and other medical causes of fracture is always indicated. The majority of OI patients can be diagnosed with the help of family history, physical examination, and radiographic findings. In particular, there are a few radiological findings which are seen more commonly in NAI than in OI which may help guide clinician considerations regarding the probability of either of these diagnoses. At the same time, molecular testing still merits careful consideration in cases with unexplained fractures without obvious additional signs of abuse.

KW - Child abuse

KW - Non-accidental injury

KW - Osteogenesis imperfecta

KW - Rib fractures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954373774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954373774&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajmg.c.31463

DO - 10.1002/ajmg.c.31463

M3 - Review article

VL - 169

SP - 302

EP - 306

JO - American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A

JF - American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A

SN - 1552-4825

IS - 4

ER -