Can science test supernatural worldviews?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Several prominent scientists, philosophers, and scientific institutions have argued that science cannot test supernatural worldviews on the grounds that (1) science presupposes a naturalistic worldview (Naturalism) or that (2) claims involving supernatural phenomena are inherently beyond the scope of scientific investigation. The present paper argues that these assumptions are questionable and that indeed science can test supernatural claims. While scientific evidence may ultimately support a naturalistic worldview, science does not presuppose Naturalism as an a priori commitment, and supernatural claims are amenable to scientific evaluation. This conclusion challenges the rationale behind a recent judicial ruling in the United States concerning the teaching of Intelligent Design in public schools as an alternative to evolution and the official statements of two major scientific institutions that exert a substantial influence on science educational policies in the United States. Given that science does have implications concerning the probable truth of supernatural worldviews, claims should not be excluded a priori from science education simply because they might be characterized as supernatural, paranormal, or religious. Rather, claims should be excluded from science education when the evidence does not support them, regardless of whether they are designated as 'natural' or 'supernatural'.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationScience, Worldviews and Education
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
Pages165-189
Number of pages25
ISBN (Print)9789048127788
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

worldview
science
scientific institution
naturalism
Supernatural
World View
educational policy
evidence
education
commitment
Teaching
evaluation
school

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Fishman, Y. I. (2009). Can science test supernatural worldviews? In Science, Worldviews and Education (pp. 165-189). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2779-5_9

Can science test supernatural worldviews? / Fishman, Yonatan I.

Science, Worldviews and Education. Springer Netherlands, 2009. p. 165-189.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Fishman, YI 2009, Can science test supernatural worldviews? in Science, Worldviews and Education. Springer Netherlands, pp. 165-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2779-5_9
Fishman YI. Can science test supernatural worldviews? In Science, Worldviews and Education. Springer Netherlands. 2009. p. 165-189 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2779-5_9
Fishman, Yonatan I. / Can science test supernatural worldviews?. Science, Worldviews and Education. Springer Netherlands, 2009. pp. 165-189
@inbook{58bc95bd1a6243c6ab4028222dd35c8e,
title = "Can science test supernatural worldviews?",
abstract = "Several prominent scientists, philosophers, and scientific institutions have argued that science cannot test supernatural worldviews on the grounds that (1) science presupposes a naturalistic worldview (Naturalism) or that (2) claims involving supernatural phenomena are inherently beyond the scope of scientific investigation. The present paper argues that these assumptions are questionable and that indeed science can test supernatural claims. While scientific evidence may ultimately support a naturalistic worldview, science does not presuppose Naturalism as an a priori commitment, and supernatural claims are amenable to scientific evaluation. This conclusion challenges the rationale behind a recent judicial ruling in the United States concerning the teaching of Intelligent Design in public schools as an alternative to evolution and the official statements of two major scientific institutions that exert a substantial influence on science educational policies in the United States. Given that science does have implications concerning the probable truth of supernatural worldviews, claims should not be excluded a priori from science education simply because they might be characterized as supernatural, paranormal, or religious. Rather, claims should be excluded from science education when the evidence does not support them, regardless of whether they are designated as 'natural' or 'supernatural'.",
author = "Fishman, {Yonatan I.}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1007/978-90-481-2779-5_9",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9789048127788",
pages = "165--189",
booktitle = "Science, Worldviews and Education",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Can science test supernatural worldviews?

AU - Fishman, Yonatan I.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Several prominent scientists, philosophers, and scientific institutions have argued that science cannot test supernatural worldviews on the grounds that (1) science presupposes a naturalistic worldview (Naturalism) or that (2) claims involving supernatural phenomena are inherently beyond the scope of scientific investigation. The present paper argues that these assumptions are questionable and that indeed science can test supernatural claims. While scientific evidence may ultimately support a naturalistic worldview, science does not presuppose Naturalism as an a priori commitment, and supernatural claims are amenable to scientific evaluation. This conclusion challenges the rationale behind a recent judicial ruling in the United States concerning the teaching of Intelligent Design in public schools as an alternative to evolution and the official statements of two major scientific institutions that exert a substantial influence on science educational policies in the United States. Given that science does have implications concerning the probable truth of supernatural worldviews, claims should not be excluded a priori from science education simply because they might be characterized as supernatural, paranormal, or religious. Rather, claims should be excluded from science education when the evidence does not support them, regardless of whether they are designated as 'natural' or 'supernatural'.

AB - Several prominent scientists, philosophers, and scientific institutions have argued that science cannot test supernatural worldviews on the grounds that (1) science presupposes a naturalistic worldview (Naturalism) or that (2) claims involving supernatural phenomena are inherently beyond the scope of scientific investigation. The present paper argues that these assumptions are questionable and that indeed science can test supernatural claims. While scientific evidence may ultimately support a naturalistic worldview, science does not presuppose Naturalism as an a priori commitment, and supernatural claims are amenable to scientific evaluation. This conclusion challenges the rationale behind a recent judicial ruling in the United States concerning the teaching of Intelligent Design in public schools as an alternative to evolution and the official statements of two major scientific institutions that exert a substantial influence on science educational policies in the United States. Given that science does have implications concerning the probable truth of supernatural worldviews, claims should not be excluded a priori from science education simply because they might be characterized as supernatural, paranormal, or religious. Rather, claims should be excluded from science education when the evidence does not support them, regardless of whether they are designated as 'natural' or 'supernatural'.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892322238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892322238&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-90-481-2779-5_9

DO - 10.1007/978-90-481-2779-5_9

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84892322238

SN - 9789048127788

SP - 165

EP - 189

BT - Science, Worldviews and Education

PB - Springer Netherlands

ER -