Can one do good medical ethics without principles?

Ruth Macklin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

The criteria for determining what it is to do good medical ethics are the quality of ethical analysis and ethical justifications for decisions and actions. Justifications for decisions and actions rely on ethical principles, be they the 'famous four' or subsidiary ethical principles relevant to specific contexts. Examples from clinical ethics, research ethics and public health ethics reveal that even when not stated explicitly, principles are involved in ethical justifications. Principles may come into conflict, however, and the resolution of an ethical dilemma requires providing good reasons for preferring one principle over another.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-78
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Can one do good medical ethics without principles?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this