Buffered versus plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple laceration repair

Joel M. Bartfield, Paul Gennis, Joseph Barbera, Brenda Breuer, E. John Gallagher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

80 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objective: Buffered lidocaine was compared with plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple lacerations. Design: Randomized, double-blind, prospective clinical trial. Setting: Urban emergency department. Type of participants: Ninety-one adult patients with simple linear lacerations were enrolled. Patients with allergy to lidocaine and patients with an abnormal mental status were excluded. Interventions: Each wound edge was anesthetized with either plain or buffered lidocaine using a randomized, double-blind protocol. The pain of infiltration was measured with a previously validated visual analog pain scale. Measurements and main results: Analysis of pooled data and paired data (using patients as their own controls) revealed that infiltrating buffered lidocaine was significantly less painful than plain lidocaine (P = .03 and P = .02, respectively). There was no significant difference in the anesthetic effectiveness of the two agents during suturing. Conclusion: Buffered lidocaine is preferable to plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic agent for the repair of simple lacerations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1387-1389
Number of pages3
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume19
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990

Fingerprint

Lacerations
Lidocaine
Local Anesthetics
Anesthetics
Pain Measurement
Hospital Emergency Service
Hypersensitivity
Clinical Trials
Pain
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • lidocaine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Buffered versus plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple laceration repair. / Bartfield, Joel M.; Gennis, Paul; Barbera, Joseph; Breuer, Brenda; Gallagher, E. John.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 12, 1990, p. 1387-1389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bartfield, Joel M. ; Gennis, Paul ; Barbera, Joseph ; Breuer, Brenda ; Gallagher, E. John. / Buffered versus plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple laceration repair. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1990 ; Vol. 19, No. 12. pp. 1387-1389.
@article{f97c0139fb274268893406a28b790f05,
title = "Buffered versus plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple laceration repair",
abstract = "Study objective: Buffered lidocaine was compared with plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple lacerations. Design: Randomized, double-blind, prospective clinical trial. Setting: Urban emergency department. Type of participants: Ninety-one adult patients with simple linear lacerations were enrolled. Patients with allergy to lidocaine and patients with an abnormal mental status were excluded. Interventions: Each wound edge was anesthetized with either plain or buffered lidocaine using a randomized, double-blind protocol. The pain of infiltration was measured with a previously validated visual analog pain scale. Measurements and main results: Analysis of pooled data and paired data (using patients as their own controls) revealed that infiltrating buffered lidocaine was significantly less painful than plain lidocaine (P = .03 and P = .02, respectively). There was no significant difference in the anesthetic effectiveness of the two agents during suturing. Conclusion: Buffered lidocaine is preferable to plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic agent for the repair of simple lacerations.",
keywords = "lidocaine",
author = "Bartfield, {Joel M.} and Paul Gennis and Joseph Barbera and Brenda Breuer and Gallagher, {E. John}",
year = "1990",
doi = "10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82603-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "1387--1389",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Buffered versus plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple laceration repair

AU - Bartfield, Joel M.

AU - Gennis, Paul

AU - Barbera, Joseph

AU - Breuer, Brenda

AU - Gallagher, E. John

PY - 1990

Y1 - 1990

N2 - Study objective: Buffered lidocaine was compared with plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple lacerations. Design: Randomized, double-blind, prospective clinical trial. Setting: Urban emergency department. Type of participants: Ninety-one adult patients with simple linear lacerations were enrolled. Patients with allergy to lidocaine and patients with an abnormal mental status were excluded. Interventions: Each wound edge was anesthetized with either plain or buffered lidocaine using a randomized, double-blind protocol. The pain of infiltration was measured with a previously validated visual analog pain scale. Measurements and main results: Analysis of pooled data and paired data (using patients as their own controls) revealed that infiltrating buffered lidocaine was significantly less painful than plain lidocaine (P = .03 and P = .02, respectively). There was no significant difference in the anesthetic effectiveness of the two agents during suturing. Conclusion: Buffered lidocaine is preferable to plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic agent for the repair of simple lacerations.

AB - Study objective: Buffered lidocaine was compared with plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic for simple lacerations. Design: Randomized, double-blind, prospective clinical trial. Setting: Urban emergency department. Type of participants: Ninety-one adult patients with simple linear lacerations were enrolled. Patients with allergy to lidocaine and patients with an abnormal mental status were excluded. Interventions: Each wound edge was anesthetized with either plain or buffered lidocaine using a randomized, double-blind protocol. The pain of infiltration was measured with a previously validated visual analog pain scale. Measurements and main results: Analysis of pooled data and paired data (using patients as their own controls) revealed that infiltrating buffered lidocaine was significantly less painful than plain lidocaine (P = .03 and P = .02, respectively). There was no significant difference in the anesthetic effectiveness of the two agents during suturing. Conclusion: Buffered lidocaine is preferable to plain lidocaine as a local anesthetic agent for the repair of simple lacerations.

KW - lidocaine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025241435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025241435&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82603-4

DO - 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82603-4

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 1387

EP - 1389

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 12

ER -