Barriers to ultrasound training in critical care medicine fellowships

A survey of program directors

Lewis Eisen, Sharon S. Leung, Annemarie E. Gallagher, Vladimir Kvetan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Ultrasonography is an effective tool for making quick diagnoses and guiding therapeutic procedures. National organizations have advocated increasing the use of critical care ultrasonography. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of teaching of critical care ultrasonography in fellowship programs. In addition, we hoped to identify barriers to establishment of ultrasound training programs. Design: All pulmonary/critical care and critical care medicine (CCM) program directors in the United States were invited to participate in an online survey. We asked respondents for demographic information about their programs and perceived barriers to training, as well as current training opportunities for their fellows in five aspects of critical care ultrasonography. A five-point Likert scale was used for survey answers. Setting: Web-based survey. Subjects: Pulmonary/critical care and CCM program directors in the United States. Interventions: Web-based survey. Measurements and main results: Ninety (66%) of 136 program directors responded. Ultrasonography training was offered by fellowship programs in the following areas: vascular access (98%), lung and pleural (74%), cardiac (55%), vascular diagnostic (33%), and abdominal (37%). Ninety-two percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that ultrasound training is useful, and 80% were interested in getting their fellows trained. Forty-one percent indicated that they lacked sufficient faculty trained in ultrasound use. Eighty-four percent agreed or strongly agreed that fellow turnover was an impediment to training. Forty-eight percent believed that cardiac echocardiography required a long training time. Conclusions: Although ultrasound training in vascular access was nearly universal, training in other aspects of ultrasound was less prevalent. We identified several barriers, including fellow turnover, insufficient faculty training, and perceived length of time required for echocardiography training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1978-1983
Number of pages6
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume38
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010

Fingerprint

Critical Care
Medicine
Ultrasonography
Blood Vessels
Lung
Echocardiography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teaching
Demography
Organizations
Education

Keywords

  • critical care
  • echocardiography
  • education
  • intensive care units
  • surveys
  • ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Barriers to ultrasound training in critical care medicine fellowships : A survey of program directors. / Eisen, Lewis; Leung, Sharon S.; Gallagher, Annemarie E.; Kvetan, Vladimir.

In: Critical Care Medicine, Vol. 38, No. 10, 10.2010, p. 1978-1983.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e9347e512a954d8da745b0107861d0ae,
title = "Barriers to ultrasound training in critical care medicine fellowships: A survey of program directors",
abstract = "Objective: Ultrasonography is an effective tool for making quick diagnoses and guiding therapeutic procedures. National organizations have advocated increasing the use of critical care ultrasonography. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of teaching of critical care ultrasonography in fellowship programs. In addition, we hoped to identify barriers to establishment of ultrasound training programs. Design: All pulmonary/critical care and critical care medicine (CCM) program directors in the United States were invited to participate in an online survey. We asked respondents for demographic information about their programs and perceived barriers to training, as well as current training opportunities for their fellows in five aspects of critical care ultrasonography. A five-point Likert scale was used for survey answers. Setting: Web-based survey. Subjects: Pulmonary/critical care and CCM program directors in the United States. Interventions: Web-based survey. Measurements and main results: Ninety (66{\%}) of 136 program directors responded. Ultrasonography training was offered by fellowship programs in the following areas: vascular access (98{\%}), lung and pleural (74{\%}), cardiac (55{\%}), vascular diagnostic (33{\%}), and abdominal (37{\%}). Ninety-two percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that ultrasound training is useful, and 80{\%} were interested in getting their fellows trained. Forty-one percent indicated that they lacked sufficient faculty trained in ultrasound use. Eighty-four percent agreed or strongly agreed that fellow turnover was an impediment to training. Forty-eight percent believed that cardiac echocardiography required a long training time. Conclusions: Although ultrasound training in vascular access was nearly universal, training in other aspects of ultrasound was less prevalent. We identified several barriers, including fellow turnover, insufficient faculty training, and perceived length of time required for echocardiography training.",
keywords = "critical care, echocardiography, education, intensive care units, surveys, ultrasonography",
author = "Lewis Eisen and Leung, {Sharon S.} and Gallagher, {Annemarie E.} and Vladimir Kvetan",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181eeda53",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "1978--1983",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to ultrasound training in critical care medicine fellowships

T2 - A survey of program directors

AU - Eisen, Lewis

AU - Leung, Sharon S.

AU - Gallagher, Annemarie E.

AU - Kvetan, Vladimir

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Objective: Ultrasonography is an effective tool for making quick diagnoses and guiding therapeutic procedures. National organizations have advocated increasing the use of critical care ultrasonography. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of teaching of critical care ultrasonography in fellowship programs. In addition, we hoped to identify barriers to establishment of ultrasound training programs. Design: All pulmonary/critical care and critical care medicine (CCM) program directors in the United States were invited to participate in an online survey. We asked respondents for demographic information about their programs and perceived barriers to training, as well as current training opportunities for their fellows in five aspects of critical care ultrasonography. A five-point Likert scale was used for survey answers. Setting: Web-based survey. Subjects: Pulmonary/critical care and CCM program directors in the United States. Interventions: Web-based survey. Measurements and main results: Ninety (66%) of 136 program directors responded. Ultrasonography training was offered by fellowship programs in the following areas: vascular access (98%), lung and pleural (74%), cardiac (55%), vascular diagnostic (33%), and abdominal (37%). Ninety-two percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that ultrasound training is useful, and 80% were interested in getting their fellows trained. Forty-one percent indicated that they lacked sufficient faculty trained in ultrasound use. Eighty-four percent agreed or strongly agreed that fellow turnover was an impediment to training. Forty-eight percent believed that cardiac echocardiography required a long training time. Conclusions: Although ultrasound training in vascular access was nearly universal, training in other aspects of ultrasound was less prevalent. We identified several barriers, including fellow turnover, insufficient faculty training, and perceived length of time required for echocardiography training.

AB - Objective: Ultrasonography is an effective tool for making quick diagnoses and guiding therapeutic procedures. National organizations have advocated increasing the use of critical care ultrasonography. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of teaching of critical care ultrasonography in fellowship programs. In addition, we hoped to identify barriers to establishment of ultrasound training programs. Design: All pulmonary/critical care and critical care medicine (CCM) program directors in the United States were invited to participate in an online survey. We asked respondents for demographic information about their programs and perceived barriers to training, as well as current training opportunities for their fellows in five aspects of critical care ultrasonography. A five-point Likert scale was used for survey answers. Setting: Web-based survey. Subjects: Pulmonary/critical care and CCM program directors in the United States. Interventions: Web-based survey. Measurements and main results: Ninety (66%) of 136 program directors responded. Ultrasonography training was offered by fellowship programs in the following areas: vascular access (98%), lung and pleural (74%), cardiac (55%), vascular diagnostic (33%), and abdominal (37%). Ninety-two percent of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that ultrasound training is useful, and 80% were interested in getting their fellows trained. Forty-one percent indicated that they lacked sufficient faculty trained in ultrasound use. Eighty-four percent agreed or strongly agreed that fellow turnover was an impediment to training. Forty-eight percent believed that cardiac echocardiography required a long training time. Conclusions: Although ultrasound training in vascular access was nearly universal, training in other aspects of ultrasound was less prevalent. We identified several barriers, including fellow turnover, insufficient faculty training, and perceived length of time required for echocardiography training.

KW - critical care

KW - echocardiography

KW - education

KW - intensive care units

KW - surveys

KW - ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957229571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957229571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181eeda53

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181eeda53

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 1978

EP - 1983

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 10

ER -