An Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery in Various Hospital Settings

Matthew T. Morris, Jonathan Morris, Camari Wallace, Woojin Cho, Alok Sharan, Manal Abouelrigal, Vilma A. Joseph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Objective: To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy and microdiscectomy surgery performed in an academic versus private practice hospital setting. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed charts of 188 consecutive patients who underwent lumbar laminectomy or microdiscectomy by a single surgeon from 2012 to 2016 at either an academic or a private practice hospital setting. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded and direct variable costs were calculated. Results: At the academic institution, the direct cost of a lumbar laminectomy or microdiscectomy surgery under general anesthesia was determined to be 9.93% greater than with spinal anesthesia (P =.040). The greatest difference was seen with operating room costs, in which general anesthesia was associated with 18.74% greater costs than spinal anesthesia (P =.016). There was no significant difference in cost at the private practice hospital setting. Conclusions: We conclude that use of spinal anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy leads to less operating room, postanesthesia care unit, and anesthesia times, lower levels of postoperative pain, and no increased rate of other complications compared with general anesthesia at an academic institution as compared to a private practice setting. Spinal anesthesia is 9.93% less expensive than general anesthesia, indicating substantial cost-saving potential. With no sacrifice of patient outcomes and the added benefit of less pain and recovery time, Spinal anesthesia represents a more cost-effective alternative to general anesthesia in lumbar spine surgery in the academic hospital setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)368-374
Number of pages7
JournalGlobal Spine Journal
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

Spinal Anesthesia
General Anesthesia
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Spine
Laminectomy
Private Practice
Costs and Cost Analysis
Private Hospitals
Operating Rooms
Postoperative Pain
Anesthesia
Retrospective Studies
Pain

Keywords

  • back pain
  • discectomy
  • laminectomy
  • lumbar
  • orthopedic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

An Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery in Various Hospital Settings. / Morris, Matthew T.; Morris, Jonathan; Wallace, Camari; Cho, Woojin; Sharan, Alok; Abouelrigal, Manal; Joseph, Vilma A.

In: Global Spine Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, 01.06.2019, p. 368-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morris, Matthew T. ; Morris, Jonathan ; Wallace, Camari ; Cho, Woojin ; Sharan, Alok ; Abouelrigal, Manal ; Joseph, Vilma A. / An Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery in Various Hospital Settings. In: Global Spine Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 368-374.
@article{1bd9df52bafa4011a8c5fa5b58e77c4d,
title = "An Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery in Various Hospital Settings",
abstract = "Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Objective: To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy and microdiscectomy surgery performed in an academic versus private practice hospital setting. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed charts of 188 consecutive patients who underwent lumbar laminectomy or microdiscectomy by a single surgeon from 2012 to 2016 at either an academic or a private practice hospital setting. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded and direct variable costs were calculated. Results: At the academic institution, the direct cost of a lumbar laminectomy or microdiscectomy surgery under general anesthesia was determined to be 9.93{\%} greater than with spinal anesthesia (P =.040). The greatest difference was seen with operating room costs, in which general anesthesia was associated with 18.74{\%} greater costs than spinal anesthesia (P =.016). There was no significant difference in cost at the private practice hospital setting. Conclusions: We conclude that use of spinal anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy leads to less operating room, postanesthesia care unit, and anesthesia times, lower levels of postoperative pain, and no increased rate of other complications compared with general anesthesia at an academic institution as compared to a private practice setting. Spinal anesthesia is 9.93{\%} less expensive than general anesthesia, indicating substantial cost-saving potential. With no sacrifice of patient outcomes and the added benefit of less pain and recovery time, Spinal anesthesia represents a more cost-effective alternative to general anesthesia in lumbar spine surgery in the academic hospital setting.",
keywords = "back pain, discectomy, laminectomy, lumbar, orthopedic",
author = "Morris, {Matthew T.} and Jonathan Morris and Camari Wallace and Woojin Cho and Alok Sharan and Manal Abouelrigal and Joseph, {Vilma A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2192568218795867",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "368--374",
journal = "Global Spine Journal",
issn = "2192-5682",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery in Various Hospital Settings

AU - Morris, Matthew T.

AU - Morris, Jonathan

AU - Wallace, Camari

AU - Cho, Woojin

AU - Sharan, Alok

AU - Abouelrigal, Manal

AU - Joseph, Vilma A.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Objective: To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy and microdiscectomy surgery performed in an academic versus private practice hospital setting. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed charts of 188 consecutive patients who underwent lumbar laminectomy or microdiscectomy by a single surgeon from 2012 to 2016 at either an academic or a private practice hospital setting. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded and direct variable costs were calculated. Results: At the academic institution, the direct cost of a lumbar laminectomy or microdiscectomy surgery under general anesthesia was determined to be 9.93% greater than with spinal anesthesia (P =.040). The greatest difference was seen with operating room costs, in which general anesthesia was associated with 18.74% greater costs than spinal anesthesia (P =.016). There was no significant difference in cost at the private practice hospital setting. Conclusions: We conclude that use of spinal anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy leads to less operating room, postanesthesia care unit, and anesthesia times, lower levels of postoperative pain, and no increased rate of other complications compared with general anesthesia at an academic institution as compared to a private practice setting. Spinal anesthesia is 9.93% less expensive than general anesthesia, indicating substantial cost-saving potential. With no sacrifice of patient outcomes and the added benefit of less pain and recovery time, Spinal anesthesia represents a more cost-effective alternative to general anesthesia in lumbar spine surgery in the academic hospital setting.

AB - Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Objective: To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy and microdiscectomy surgery performed in an academic versus private practice hospital setting. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed charts of 188 consecutive patients who underwent lumbar laminectomy or microdiscectomy by a single surgeon from 2012 to 2016 at either an academic or a private practice hospital setting. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded and direct variable costs were calculated. Results: At the academic institution, the direct cost of a lumbar laminectomy or microdiscectomy surgery under general anesthesia was determined to be 9.93% greater than with spinal anesthesia (P =.040). The greatest difference was seen with operating room costs, in which general anesthesia was associated with 18.74% greater costs than spinal anesthesia (P =.016). There was no significant difference in cost at the private practice hospital setting. Conclusions: We conclude that use of spinal anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy leads to less operating room, postanesthesia care unit, and anesthesia times, lower levels of postoperative pain, and no increased rate of other complications compared with general anesthesia at an academic institution as compared to a private practice setting. Spinal anesthesia is 9.93% less expensive than general anesthesia, indicating substantial cost-saving potential. With no sacrifice of patient outcomes and the added benefit of less pain and recovery time, Spinal anesthesia represents a more cost-effective alternative to general anesthesia in lumbar spine surgery in the academic hospital setting.

KW - back pain

KW - discectomy

KW - laminectomy

KW - lumbar

KW - orthopedic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067255866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067255866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2192568218795867

DO - 10.1177/2192568218795867

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067255866

VL - 9

SP - 368

EP - 374

JO - Global Spine Journal

JF - Global Spine Journal

SN - 2192-5682

IS - 4

ER -