ACR Colon Cancer Committee White Paper

Status of CT Colonography 2009

Elizabeth G. McFarland, Joel G. Fletcher, Perry Pickhardt, Abraham Dachman, Judy Yee, Cynthia H. McCollough, Michael Macari, Paul Knechtges, Michael Zalis, Matthew Barish, David H. Kim, Kathryn J. Keysor, C. Daniel Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To review the current status and rationale of the updated ACR practice guidelines for CT colonography (CTC). Methods: Clinical validation trials in both the United States and Europe are reviewed. Key technical aspects of the CTC examination are emphasized, including low-dose protocols, proper insufflation, and bowel preparation. Important issues of implementation are discussed, including training and certification, definition of the target lesion, reporting of colonic and extracolonic findings, quality metrics, reimbursement, and cost-effectiveness. Results: Successful validation trials in screening cohorts both in the United States with ACRIN® and in Germany demonstrated sensitivity ≥90% for patients with polyps >10 mm. Proper technique is critical, including low-dose techniques in screening cohorts, with an upper limit of the CT dose index by volume of 12.5 mGy per examination. Training new readers includes the requirement of interactive workstation training with 2-D and 3-D image display techniques. The target lesion is defined as a polyp ≥6 mm, consistent with the American Cancer Society joint guidelines. Five quality metrics have been defined for CTC, with pilot data entered. Although the CMS national noncoverage decision in May 2009 was a disappointment, multiple third-party payers are reimbursing for screening CTC. Cost-effective modeling has shown CTC to be a dominant strategy, including in a Medicare cohort. Conclusion: Supported by third-party payer reimbursement for screening, CTC will continue to further transition into community practice and can provide an important adjunctive examination for colorectal screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume6
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Computed Tomographic Colonography
Colonic Neoplasms
Health Insurance Reimbursement
Polyps
Insufflation
Three-Dimensional Imaging
Certification
Medicare
Practice Guidelines
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Germany
Joints
Clinical Trials
Guidelines
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • 2-D and 3-D image display techniques
  • CT colonography
  • polyp

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

McFarland, E. G., Fletcher, J. G., Pickhardt, P., Dachman, A., Yee, J., McCollough, C. H., ... Johnson, C. D. (2009). ACR Colon Cancer Committee White Paper: Status of CT Colonography 2009. Journal of the American College of Radiology, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.007

ACR Colon Cancer Committee White Paper : Status of CT Colonography 2009. / McFarland, Elizabeth G.; Fletcher, Joel G.; Pickhardt, Perry; Dachman, Abraham; Yee, Judy; McCollough, Cynthia H.; Macari, Michael; Knechtges, Paul; Zalis, Michael; Barish, Matthew; Kim, David H.; Keysor, Kathryn J.; Johnson, C. Daniel.

In: Journal of the American College of Radiology, Vol. 6, No. 11, 01.01.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McFarland, EG, Fletcher, JG, Pickhardt, P, Dachman, A, Yee, J, McCollough, CH, Macari, M, Knechtges, P, Zalis, M, Barish, M, Kim, DH, Keysor, KJ & Johnson, CD 2009, 'ACR Colon Cancer Committee White Paper: Status of CT Colonography 2009', Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol. 6, no. 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.007
McFarland, Elizabeth G. ; Fletcher, Joel G. ; Pickhardt, Perry ; Dachman, Abraham ; Yee, Judy ; McCollough, Cynthia H. ; Macari, Michael ; Knechtges, Paul ; Zalis, Michael ; Barish, Matthew ; Kim, David H. ; Keysor, Kathryn J. ; Johnson, C. Daniel. / ACR Colon Cancer Committee White Paper : Status of CT Colonography 2009. In: Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2009 ; Vol. 6, No. 11.
@article{d3aae6a846194c1ab21d3dd80c6035fa,
title = "ACR Colon Cancer Committee White Paper: Status of CT Colonography 2009",
abstract = "Purpose: To review the current status and rationale of the updated ACR practice guidelines for CT colonography (CTC). Methods: Clinical validation trials in both the United States and Europe are reviewed. Key technical aspects of the CTC examination are emphasized, including low-dose protocols, proper insufflation, and bowel preparation. Important issues of implementation are discussed, including training and certification, definition of the target lesion, reporting of colonic and extracolonic findings, quality metrics, reimbursement, and cost-effectiveness. Results: Successful validation trials in screening cohorts both in the United States with ACRIN{\circledR} and in Germany demonstrated sensitivity ≥90{\%} for patients with polyps >10 mm. Proper technique is critical, including low-dose techniques in screening cohorts, with an upper limit of the CT dose index by volume of 12.5 mGy per examination. Training new readers includes the requirement of interactive workstation training with 2-D and 3-D image display techniques. The target lesion is defined as a polyp ≥6 mm, consistent with the American Cancer Society joint guidelines. Five quality metrics have been defined for CTC, with pilot data entered. Although the CMS national noncoverage decision in May 2009 was a disappointment, multiple third-party payers are reimbursing for screening CTC. Cost-effective modeling has shown CTC to be a dominant strategy, including in a Medicare cohort. Conclusion: Supported by third-party payer reimbursement for screening, CTC will continue to further transition into community practice and can provide an important adjunctive examination for colorectal screening.",
keywords = "2-D and 3-D image display techniques, CT colonography, polyp",
author = "McFarland, {Elizabeth G.} and Fletcher, {Joel G.} and Perry Pickhardt and Abraham Dachman and Judy Yee and McCollough, {Cynthia H.} and Michael Macari and Paul Knechtges and Michael Zalis and Matthew Barish and Kim, {David H.} and Keysor, {Kathryn J.} and Johnson, {C. Daniel}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",
issn = "1558-349X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACR Colon Cancer Committee White Paper

T2 - Status of CT Colonography 2009

AU - McFarland, Elizabeth G.

AU - Fletcher, Joel G.

AU - Pickhardt, Perry

AU - Dachman, Abraham

AU - Yee, Judy

AU - McCollough, Cynthia H.

AU - Macari, Michael

AU - Knechtges, Paul

AU - Zalis, Michael

AU - Barish, Matthew

AU - Kim, David H.

AU - Keysor, Kathryn J.

AU - Johnson, C. Daniel

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To review the current status and rationale of the updated ACR practice guidelines for CT colonography (CTC). Methods: Clinical validation trials in both the United States and Europe are reviewed. Key technical aspects of the CTC examination are emphasized, including low-dose protocols, proper insufflation, and bowel preparation. Important issues of implementation are discussed, including training and certification, definition of the target lesion, reporting of colonic and extracolonic findings, quality metrics, reimbursement, and cost-effectiveness. Results: Successful validation trials in screening cohorts both in the United States with ACRIN® and in Germany demonstrated sensitivity ≥90% for patients with polyps >10 mm. Proper technique is critical, including low-dose techniques in screening cohorts, with an upper limit of the CT dose index by volume of 12.5 mGy per examination. Training new readers includes the requirement of interactive workstation training with 2-D and 3-D image display techniques. The target lesion is defined as a polyp ≥6 mm, consistent with the American Cancer Society joint guidelines. Five quality metrics have been defined for CTC, with pilot data entered. Although the CMS national noncoverage decision in May 2009 was a disappointment, multiple third-party payers are reimbursing for screening CTC. Cost-effective modeling has shown CTC to be a dominant strategy, including in a Medicare cohort. Conclusion: Supported by third-party payer reimbursement for screening, CTC will continue to further transition into community practice and can provide an important adjunctive examination for colorectal screening.

AB - Purpose: To review the current status and rationale of the updated ACR practice guidelines for CT colonography (CTC). Methods: Clinical validation trials in both the United States and Europe are reviewed. Key technical aspects of the CTC examination are emphasized, including low-dose protocols, proper insufflation, and bowel preparation. Important issues of implementation are discussed, including training and certification, definition of the target lesion, reporting of colonic and extracolonic findings, quality metrics, reimbursement, and cost-effectiveness. Results: Successful validation trials in screening cohorts both in the United States with ACRIN® and in Germany demonstrated sensitivity ≥90% for patients with polyps >10 mm. Proper technique is critical, including low-dose techniques in screening cohorts, with an upper limit of the CT dose index by volume of 12.5 mGy per examination. Training new readers includes the requirement of interactive workstation training with 2-D and 3-D image display techniques. The target lesion is defined as a polyp ≥6 mm, consistent with the American Cancer Society joint guidelines. Five quality metrics have been defined for CTC, with pilot data entered. Although the CMS national noncoverage decision in May 2009 was a disappointment, multiple third-party payers are reimbursing for screening CTC. Cost-effective modeling has shown CTC to be a dominant strategy, including in a Medicare cohort. Conclusion: Supported by third-party payer reimbursement for screening, CTC will continue to further transition into community practice and can provide an important adjunctive examination for colorectal screening.

KW - 2-D and 3-D image display techniques

KW - CT colonography

KW - polyp

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72049098502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72049098502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.09.007

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

SN - 1558-349X

IS - 11

ER -