ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update

A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association Tomography

Manesh R. Patel, Gregory J. Dehmer, John W. Hirshfeld, Peter K. Smith, John A. Spertus, Frederick A. Masoudi, Charles E. Chamber, T. Bruce Ferguson, Mario J. Garcia, Frederick L. Grover, David R. Holmes, Lloyd W. Klein, Marian C. Limacher, Michael J. MacK, David J. Malenka, Myung H. Park, Michael Ragosta, James L. Ritchie, Geoffrey A. Rose, Alan B. Rosenberg & 12 others Andrea M. Russo, Richard J. Shemin, William S. Weintraub, Michael J. Wolk, Steven R. Bailey, Pamela S. Douglas, Robert C. Hendel, Christopher M. Kramer, James K. Min, Leslee Shaw, Raymond F. Stainback, Joseph M. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

348 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an update of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization frequently considered. In the initial document, 180 clinical scenarios were developed to mimic patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included information on symptom status, extent of medical therapy, risk level as assessed by noninvasive testing, and coronary anatomy. This update provides a reassessment of clinical scenarios the writing group felt to be affected by significant changes in the medical literature or gaps from prior criteria. The methodology used in this update is similar to the initial document, and the definition of appropriateness was unchanged. The technical panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate and likely to improve patients' health outcomes or survival. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate revascularization is considered inappropriate and unlikely to improve health outcomes or survival. Scores in the mid-range (4 to 6) indicate a clinical scenario for which the likelihood that coronary revascularization will improve health outcomes or survival is uncertain. In general, as seen with the prior AUC, the use of coronary revascularization for patients with acute coronary syndromes and combinations of significant symptoms and/or ischemia is appropriate. In contrast, revascularization of asymptomatic patients or patients with low-risk findings on noninvasive testing and minimal medical therapy are viewed less favorably. The technical panel felt that based on recent studies, coronary artery bypass grafting remains an appropriate method of revascularization for patients with high burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). Additionally, percutaneous coronary intervention may have a role in revascularization of patients with high burden of CAD. The primary objective of the appropriate use criteria is to improve physician decision making and patient education regarding expected benefits from revascularization and to guide future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)857-881
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume59
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 28 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Advisory Committees
Cardiology
Tomography
Survival
Coronary Artery Disease
Health
Patient Education
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Acute Coronary Syndrome
Coronary Artery Bypass
Anatomy
Decision Making
Ischemia
Physicians
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • ACCF Appropriate Use Criteria
  • coronary artery bypass graft surgery
  • percutaneous coronary interventions
  • revascularization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update : A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association Tomography. / Patel, Manesh R.; Dehmer, Gregory J.; Hirshfeld, John W.; Smith, Peter K.; Spertus, John A.; Masoudi, Frederick A.; Chamber, Charles E.; Ferguson, T. Bruce; Garcia, Mario J.; Grover, Frederick L.; Holmes, David R.; Klein, Lloyd W.; Limacher, Marian C.; MacK, Michael J.; Malenka, David J.; Park, Myung H.; Ragosta, Michael; Ritchie, James L.; Rose, Geoffrey A.; Rosenberg, Alan B.; Russo, Andrea M.; Shemin, Richard J.; Weintraub, William S.; Wolk, Michael J.; Bailey, Steven R.; Douglas, Pamela S.; Hendel, Robert C.; Kramer, Christopher M.; Min, James K.; Shaw, Leslee; Stainback, Raymond F.; Allen, Joseph M.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 59, No. 9, 28.02.2012, p. 857-881.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, MR, Dehmer, GJ, Hirshfeld, JW, Smith, PK, Spertus, JA, Masoudi, FA, Chamber, CE, Ferguson, TB, Garcia, MJ, Grover, FL, Holmes, DR, Klein, LW, Limacher, MC, MacK, MJ, Malenka, DJ, Park, MH, Ragosta, M, Ritchie, JL, Rose, GA, Rosenberg, AB, Russo, AM, Shemin, RJ, Weintraub, WS, Wolk, MJ, Bailey, SR, Douglas, PS, Hendel, RC, Kramer, CM, Min, JK, Shaw, L, Stainback, RF & Allen, JM 2012, 'ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association Tomography', Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 857-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.001
Patel, Manesh R. ; Dehmer, Gregory J. ; Hirshfeld, John W. ; Smith, Peter K. ; Spertus, John A. ; Masoudi, Frederick A. ; Chamber, Charles E. ; Ferguson, T. Bruce ; Garcia, Mario J. ; Grover, Frederick L. ; Holmes, David R. ; Klein, Lloyd W. ; Limacher, Marian C. ; MacK, Michael J. ; Malenka, David J. ; Park, Myung H. ; Ragosta, Michael ; Ritchie, James L. ; Rose, Geoffrey A. ; Rosenberg, Alan B. ; Russo, Andrea M. ; Shemin, Richard J. ; Weintraub, William S. ; Wolk, Michael J. ; Bailey, Steven R. ; Douglas, Pamela S. ; Hendel, Robert C. ; Kramer, Christopher M. ; Min, James K. ; Shaw, Leslee ; Stainback, Raymond F. ; Allen, Joseph M. / ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update : A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association Tomography. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012 ; Vol. 59, No. 9. pp. 857-881.
@article{2c2eb38289b1428c886b3daf3feebfde,
title = "ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association Tomography",
abstract = "The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an update of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization frequently considered. In the initial document, 180 clinical scenarios were developed to mimic patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included information on symptom status, extent of medical therapy, risk level as assessed by noninvasive testing, and coronary anatomy. This update provides a reassessment of clinical scenarios the writing group felt to be affected by significant changes in the medical literature or gaps from prior criteria. The methodology used in this update is similar to the initial document, and the definition of appropriateness was unchanged. The technical panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate and likely to improve patients' health outcomes or survival. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate revascularization is considered inappropriate and unlikely to improve health outcomes or survival. Scores in the mid-range (4 to 6) indicate a clinical scenario for which the likelihood that coronary revascularization will improve health outcomes or survival is uncertain. In general, as seen with the prior AUC, the use of coronary revascularization for patients with acute coronary syndromes and combinations of significant symptoms and/or ischemia is appropriate. In contrast, revascularization of asymptomatic patients or patients with low-risk findings on noninvasive testing and minimal medical therapy are viewed less favorably. The technical panel felt that based on recent studies, coronary artery bypass grafting remains an appropriate method of revascularization for patients with high burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). Additionally, percutaneous coronary intervention may have a role in revascularization of patients with high burden of CAD. The primary objective of the appropriate use criteria is to improve physician decision making and patient education regarding expected benefits from revascularization and to guide future research.",
keywords = "ACCF Appropriate Use Criteria, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary interventions, revascularization",
author = "Patel, {Manesh R.} and Dehmer, {Gregory J.} and Hirshfeld, {John W.} and Smith, {Peter K.} and Spertus, {John A.} and Masoudi, {Frederick A.} and Chamber, {Charles E.} and Ferguson, {T. Bruce} and Garcia, {Mario J.} and Grover, {Frederick L.} and Holmes, {David R.} and Klein, {Lloyd W.} and Limacher, {Marian C.} and MacK, {Michael J.} and Malenka, {David J.} and Park, {Myung H.} and Michael Ragosta and Ritchie, {James L.} and Rose, {Geoffrey A.} and Rosenberg, {Alan B.} and Russo, {Andrea M.} and Shemin, {Richard J.} and Weintraub, {William S.} and Wolk, {Michael J.} and Bailey, {Steven R.} and Douglas, {Pamela S.} and Hendel, {Robert C.} and Kramer, {Christopher M.} and Min, {James K.} and Leslee Shaw and Stainback, {Raymond F.} and Allen, {Joseph M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "857--881",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update

T2 - A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association Tomography

AU - Patel, Manesh R.

AU - Dehmer, Gregory J.

AU - Hirshfeld, John W.

AU - Smith, Peter K.

AU - Spertus, John A.

AU - Masoudi, Frederick A.

AU - Chamber, Charles E.

AU - Ferguson, T. Bruce

AU - Garcia, Mario J.

AU - Grover, Frederick L.

AU - Holmes, David R.

AU - Klein, Lloyd W.

AU - Limacher, Marian C.

AU - MacK, Michael J.

AU - Malenka, David J.

AU - Park, Myung H.

AU - Ragosta, Michael

AU - Ritchie, James L.

AU - Rose, Geoffrey A.

AU - Rosenberg, Alan B.

AU - Russo, Andrea M.

AU - Shemin, Richard J.

AU - Weintraub, William S.

AU - Wolk, Michael J.

AU - Bailey, Steven R.

AU - Douglas, Pamela S.

AU - Hendel, Robert C.

AU - Kramer, Christopher M.

AU - Min, James K.

AU - Shaw, Leslee

AU - Stainback, Raymond F.

AU - Allen, Joseph M.

PY - 2012/2/28

Y1 - 2012/2/28

N2 - The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an update of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization frequently considered. In the initial document, 180 clinical scenarios were developed to mimic patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included information on symptom status, extent of medical therapy, risk level as assessed by noninvasive testing, and coronary anatomy. This update provides a reassessment of clinical scenarios the writing group felt to be affected by significant changes in the medical literature or gaps from prior criteria. The methodology used in this update is similar to the initial document, and the definition of appropriateness was unchanged. The technical panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate and likely to improve patients' health outcomes or survival. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate revascularization is considered inappropriate and unlikely to improve health outcomes or survival. Scores in the mid-range (4 to 6) indicate a clinical scenario for which the likelihood that coronary revascularization will improve health outcomes or survival is uncertain. In general, as seen with the prior AUC, the use of coronary revascularization for patients with acute coronary syndromes and combinations of significant symptoms and/or ischemia is appropriate. In contrast, revascularization of asymptomatic patients or patients with low-risk findings on noninvasive testing and minimal medical therapy are viewed less favorably. The technical panel felt that based on recent studies, coronary artery bypass grafting remains an appropriate method of revascularization for patients with high burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). Additionally, percutaneous coronary intervention may have a role in revascularization of patients with high burden of CAD. The primary objective of the appropriate use criteria is to improve physician decision making and patient education regarding expected benefits from revascularization and to guide future research.

AB - The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an update of the appropriate use criteria (AUC) for coronary revascularization frequently considered. In the initial document, 180 clinical scenarios were developed to mimic patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included information on symptom status, extent of medical therapy, risk level as assessed by noninvasive testing, and coronary anatomy. This update provides a reassessment of clinical scenarios the writing group felt to be affected by significant changes in the medical literature or gaps from prior criteria. The methodology used in this update is similar to the initial document, and the definition of appropriateness was unchanged. The technical panel scored the clinical scenarios on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that revascularization is considered appropriate and likely to improve patients' health outcomes or survival. Scores of 1 to 3 indicate revascularization is considered inappropriate and unlikely to improve health outcomes or survival. Scores in the mid-range (4 to 6) indicate a clinical scenario for which the likelihood that coronary revascularization will improve health outcomes or survival is uncertain. In general, as seen with the prior AUC, the use of coronary revascularization for patients with acute coronary syndromes and combinations of significant symptoms and/or ischemia is appropriate. In contrast, revascularization of asymptomatic patients or patients with low-risk findings on noninvasive testing and minimal medical therapy are viewed less favorably. The technical panel felt that based on recent studies, coronary artery bypass grafting remains an appropriate method of revascularization for patients with high burden of coronary artery disease (CAD). Additionally, percutaneous coronary intervention may have a role in revascularization of patients with high burden of CAD. The primary objective of the appropriate use criteria is to improve physician decision making and patient education regarding expected benefits from revascularization and to guide future research.

KW - ACCF Appropriate Use Criteria

KW - coronary artery bypass graft surgery

KW - percutaneous coronary interventions

KW - revascularization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863393818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863393818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.001

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 857

EP - 881

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 9

ER -