ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate use criteria for echocardiography

Pamela S. Douglas, Mario J. Garcia, David E. Haines, Wyman W. Lai, Warren J. Manning, Ayan R. Patel, Michael H. Picard, Donna M. Polk, Michael Ragosta, R. Parker Ward, Rory B. Weiner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

297 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), in partnership with the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted a review of common clinical scenarios where echocardiography is frequently considered. This document combines and updates the original transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography appropriateness criteria published in 2007 (1) and the original stress echocardiography appropriateness criteria published in 2008 (2). This revision reflects new clinical data, reflects changes in test utilization patterns, and clarifies echocardiography use where omissions or lack of clarity existed in the original criteria. The indications (clinical scenarios) were derived from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines and results of studies examining the implementation of the original appropriate use criteria (AUC). The 202 indications in this document were developed by a diverse writing group and scored by a separate independent technical panel on a scale of 1 to 9, to designate appropriate use median 7 to 9), uncertain use median 4 to 6), and inappropriate use (median 1 to 3). Ninety-seven indications were rated as appropriate, 34 were rated as uncertain, and 71 were rated as inappropriate. In general, the use of echocardiography for initial diagnosis when there change in clinical status or when the results of the echocardiogram are anticipated to change patient management were rated appropriate. Routine testing when there was no change in clinical status or when results of testing were unlikely to modify management were more likely to be inappropriate than appropriate/uncertain. The AUC for echocardiography have the potential to impact physician decision making, healthcare delivery, and reimbursement policy. Furthermore, recognition of uncertain clinical scenarios facilitates identification of areas that would benefit from future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-267
Number of pages39
JournalJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cardiology
Echocardiography
Stress Echocardiography
Transesophageal Echocardiography
Practice Guidelines
Decision Making
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians

Keywords

  • ACCF Appropriate Use Criteria
  • Cardiac imaging
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Diagnostic testing
  • Echocardiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate use criteria for echocardiography. / Douglas, Pamela S.; Garcia, Mario J.; Haines, David E.; Lai, Wyman W.; Manning, Warren J.; Patel, Ayan R.; Picard, Michael H.; Polk, Donna M.; Ragosta, Michael; Ward, R. Parker; Weiner, Rory B.

In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, Vol. 24, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 229-267.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Douglas, PS, Garcia, MJ, Haines, DE, Lai, WW, Manning, WJ, Patel, AR, Picard, MH, Polk, DM, Ragosta, M, Ward, RP & Weiner, RB 2011, 'ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate use criteria for echocardiography', Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 229-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.12.008
Douglas, Pamela S. ; Garcia, Mario J. ; Haines, David E. ; Lai, Wyman W. ; Manning, Warren J. ; Patel, Ayan R. ; Picard, Michael H. ; Polk, Donna M. ; Ragosta, Michael ; Ward, R. Parker ; Weiner, Rory B. / ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate use criteria for echocardiography. In: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2011 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 229-267.
@article{9be66cb4450e4a22966c547f27d3abcf,
title = "ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate use criteria for echocardiography",
abstract = "The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), in partnership with the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted a review of common clinical scenarios where echocardiography is frequently considered. This document combines and updates the original transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography appropriateness criteria published in 2007 (1) and the original stress echocardiography appropriateness criteria published in 2008 (2). This revision reflects new clinical data, reflects changes in test utilization patterns, and clarifies echocardiography use where omissions or lack of clarity existed in the original criteria. The indications (clinical scenarios) were derived from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines and results of studies examining the implementation of the original appropriate use criteria (AUC). The 202 indications in this document were developed by a diverse writing group and scored by a separate independent technical panel on a scale of 1 to 9, to designate appropriate use median 7 to 9), uncertain use median 4 to 6), and inappropriate use (median 1 to 3). Ninety-seven indications were rated as appropriate, 34 were rated as uncertain, and 71 were rated as inappropriate. In general, the use of echocardiography for initial diagnosis when there change in clinical status or when the results of the echocardiogram are anticipated to change patient management were rated appropriate. Routine testing when there was no change in clinical status or when results of testing were unlikely to modify management were more likely to be inappropriate than appropriate/uncertain. The AUC for echocardiography have the potential to impact physician decision making, healthcare delivery, and reimbursement policy. Furthermore, recognition of uncertain clinical scenarios facilitates identification of areas that would benefit from future research.",
keywords = "ACCF Appropriate Use Criteria, Cardiac imaging, Coronary artery disease, Diagnostic testing, Echocardiography",
author = "Douglas, {Pamela S.} and Garcia, {Mario J.} and Haines, {David E.} and Lai, {Wyman W.} and Manning, {Warren J.} and Patel, {Ayan R.} and Picard, {Michael H.} and Polk, {Donna M.} and Michael Ragosta and Ward, {R. Parker} and Weiner, {Rory B.}",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.echo.2010.12.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "229--267",
journal = "Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography",
issn = "0894-7317",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ACCF/ASE/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR 2011 Appropriate use criteria for echocardiography

AU - Douglas, Pamela S.

AU - Garcia, Mario J.

AU - Haines, David E.

AU - Lai, Wyman W.

AU - Manning, Warren J.

AU - Patel, Ayan R.

AU - Picard, Michael H.

AU - Polk, Donna M.

AU - Ragosta, Michael

AU - Ward, R. Parker

AU - Weiner, Rory B.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), in partnership with the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted a review of common clinical scenarios where echocardiography is frequently considered. This document combines and updates the original transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography appropriateness criteria published in 2007 (1) and the original stress echocardiography appropriateness criteria published in 2008 (2). This revision reflects new clinical data, reflects changes in test utilization patterns, and clarifies echocardiography use where omissions or lack of clarity existed in the original criteria. The indications (clinical scenarios) were derived from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines and results of studies examining the implementation of the original appropriate use criteria (AUC). The 202 indications in this document were developed by a diverse writing group and scored by a separate independent technical panel on a scale of 1 to 9, to designate appropriate use median 7 to 9), uncertain use median 4 to 6), and inappropriate use (median 1 to 3). Ninety-seven indications were rated as appropriate, 34 were rated as uncertain, and 71 were rated as inappropriate. In general, the use of echocardiography for initial diagnosis when there change in clinical status or when the results of the echocardiogram are anticipated to change patient management were rated appropriate. Routine testing when there was no change in clinical status or when results of testing were unlikely to modify management were more likely to be inappropriate than appropriate/uncertain. The AUC for echocardiography have the potential to impact physician decision making, healthcare delivery, and reimbursement policy. Furthermore, recognition of uncertain clinical scenarios facilitates identification of areas that would benefit from future research.

AB - The American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF), in partnership with the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted a review of common clinical scenarios where echocardiography is frequently considered. This document combines and updates the original transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography appropriateness criteria published in 2007 (1) and the original stress echocardiography appropriateness criteria published in 2008 (2). This revision reflects new clinical data, reflects changes in test utilization patterns, and clarifies echocardiography use where omissions or lack of clarity existed in the original criteria. The indications (clinical scenarios) were derived from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines and results of studies examining the implementation of the original appropriate use criteria (AUC). The 202 indications in this document were developed by a diverse writing group and scored by a separate independent technical panel on a scale of 1 to 9, to designate appropriate use median 7 to 9), uncertain use median 4 to 6), and inappropriate use (median 1 to 3). Ninety-seven indications were rated as appropriate, 34 were rated as uncertain, and 71 were rated as inappropriate. In general, the use of echocardiography for initial diagnosis when there change in clinical status or when the results of the echocardiogram are anticipated to change patient management were rated appropriate. Routine testing when there was no change in clinical status or when results of testing were unlikely to modify management were more likely to be inappropriate than appropriate/uncertain. The AUC for echocardiography have the potential to impact physician decision making, healthcare delivery, and reimbursement policy. Furthermore, recognition of uncertain clinical scenarios facilitates identification of areas that would benefit from future research.

KW - ACCF Appropriate Use Criteria

KW - Cardiac imaging

KW - Coronary artery disease

KW - Diagnostic testing

KW - Echocardiography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951982272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951982272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.echo.2010.12.008

DO - 10.1016/j.echo.2010.12.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 21338862

AN - SCOPUS:79951982272

VL - 24

SP - 229

EP - 267

JO - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

JF - Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography

SN - 0894-7317

IS - 3

ER -