Academic peer detailing—the preparation and experience of detailers involved in a project to disseminate a comparative effectiveness module

Robert W. Morrow, Ellen P. Tattelman, Jennifer M. Purcell, Jason King, Michael Fordis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Academic detailing uses communication skills, relationship building, and feedback to facilitate behavior change. This report, part of a larger initiative to disseminate evidence summaries of systematic reviews, demonstrates the feasibility of disseminating a comparative effectiveness module to physicians using peer detailers and examines the development of faculty for this process. We describe planning and implementation of a train-the-detailer session, detailer reactions to the process, and results of the dissemination project. Methods: We recruited 10 experienced primary care clinical faculties in Family and Social Medicine at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Detailers attended a 90-minute train-the-detailer session and detailed 150 practitioners at community practices. We evaluated the experiences of the learners and detailers with questionnaires, a focus group, and individual interviews of the detailers. Results: The experiences of detailing in different contexts were uniformly positive. Learners felt the materials were valuable, and that they would implement them or already had implemented them. In the postsurvey completed by 65 of the 150 detailed learners, 97% percent stated that they changed their practice or had already incorporated the practice change before the detailing. All detailers reported a change in their own practice. Detailers found the teaching materials and detailers’ guide helpful. Some initially expressed a concern about not knowing enough, which lessened with detailing experience. Discussion: Peer detailing seems doable and well received, especially with the availability of high quality, previously prepared, and tested evidence-based content and materials. Detailers were easily recruited and trained to apply their teaching skills in this new format. The amount of time spent in training sessions on detailing training as opposed to content mastery can be adjusted depending on faculty needs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-126
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions
Volume36
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Teaching Materials
Social Medicine
experience
social medicine
Focus Groups
teaching materials
Primary Health Care
Teaching
communication skills
Communication
Medicine
Interviews
Physicians
evidence
physician
medicine
planning
questionnaire
interview
community

Keywords

  • Academic detailing
  • Action research
  • Communication skills
  • Comparative effectiveness
  • Development
  • Evaluation-educational intervention
  • Faculty
  • Inter professional education
  • Knowledge translation
  • Problem-based/case-based learning
  • Small group/team learning
  • Theory-dissemination of innovations
  • Workplace learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Academic peer detailing—the preparation and experience of detailers involved in a project to disseminate a comparative effectiveness module. / Morrow, Robert W.; Tattelman, Ellen P.; Purcell, Jennifer M.; King, Jason; Fordis, Michael.

In: Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2016, p. 123-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e03cce597fc438bb03ed20f6b2e7895,
title = "Academic peer detailing—the preparation and experience of detailers involved in a project to disseminate a comparative effectiveness module",
abstract = "Introduction: Academic detailing uses communication skills, relationship building, and feedback to facilitate behavior change. This report, part of a larger initiative to disseminate evidence summaries of systematic reviews, demonstrates the feasibility of disseminating a comparative effectiveness module to physicians using peer detailers and examines the development of faculty for this process. We describe planning and implementation of a train-the-detailer session, detailer reactions to the process, and results of the dissemination project. Methods: We recruited 10 experienced primary care clinical faculties in Family and Social Medicine at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Detailers attended a 90-minute train-the-detailer session and detailed 150 practitioners at community practices. We evaluated the experiences of the learners and detailers with questionnaires, a focus group, and individual interviews of the detailers. Results: The experiences of detailing in different contexts were uniformly positive. Learners felt the materials were valuable, and that they would implement them or already had implemented them. In the postsurvey completed by 65 of the 150 detailed learners, 97{\%} percent stated that they changed their practice or had already incorporated the practice change before the detailing. All detailers reported a change in their own practice. Detailers found the teaching materials and detailers’ guide helpful. Some initially expressed a concern about not knowing enough, which lessened with detailing experience. Discussion: Peer detailing seems doable and well received, especially with the availability of high quality, previously prepared, and tested evidence-based content and materials. Detailers were easily recruited and trained to apply their teaching skills in this new format. The amount of time spent in training sessions on detailing training as opposed to content mastery can be adjusted depending on faculty needs.",
keywords = "Academic detailing, Action research, Communication skills, Comparative effectiveness, Development, Evaluation-educational intervention, Faculty, Inter professional education, Knowledge translation, Problem-based/case-based learning, Small group/team learning, Theory-dissemination of innovations, Workplace learning",
author = "Morrow, {Robert W.} and Tattelman, {Ellen P.} and Purcell, {Jennifer M.} and Jason King and Michael Fordis",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1097/CEH.0000000000000067",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "123--126",
journal = "Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions",
issn = "0894-1912",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Academic peer detailing—the preparation and experience of detailers involved in a project to disseminate a comparative effectiveness module

AU - Morrow, Robert W.

AU - Tattelman, Ellen P.

AU - Purcell, Jennifer M.

AU - King, Jason

AU - Fordis, Michael

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Introduction: Academic detailing uses communication skills, relationship building, and feedback to facilitate behavior change. This report, part of a larger initiative to disseminate evidence summaries of systematic reviews, demonstrates the feasibility of disseminating a comparative effectiveness module to physicians using peer detailers and examines the development of faculty for this process. We describe planning and implementation of a train-the-detailer session, detailer reactions to the process, and results of the dissemination project. Methods: We recruited 10 experienced primary care clinical faculties in Family and Social Medicine at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Detailers attended a 90-minute train-the-detailer session and detailed 150 practitioners at community practices. We evaluated the experiences of the learners and detailers with questionnaires, a focus group, and individual interviews of the detailers. Results: The experiences of detailing in different contexts were uniformly positive. Learners felt the materials were valuable, and that they would implement them or already had implemented them. In the postsurvey completed by 65 of the 150 detailed learners, 97% percent stated that they changed their practice or had already incorporated the practice change before the detailing. All detailers reported a change in their own practice. Detailers found the teaching materials and detailers’ guide helpful. Some initially expressed a concern about not knowing enough, which lessened with detailing experience. Discussion: Peer detailing seems doable and well received, especially with the availability of high quality, previously prepared, and tested evidence-based content and materials. Detailers were easily recruited and trained to apply their teaching skills in this new format. The amount of time spent in training sessions on detailing training as opposed to content mastery can be adjusted depending on faculty needs.

AB - Introduction: Academic detailing uses communication skills, relationship building, and feedback to facilitate behavior change. This report, part of a larger initiative to disseminate evidence summaries of systematic reviews, demonstrates the feasibility of disseminating a comparative effectiveness module to physicians using peer detailers and examines the development of faculty for this process. We describe planning and implementation of a train-the-detailer session, detailer reactions to the process, and results of the dissemination project. Methods: We recruited 10 experienced primary care clinical faculties in Family and Social Medicine at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Detailers attended a 90-minute train-the-detailer session and detailed 150 practitioners at community practices. We evaluated the experiences of the learners and detailers with questionnaires, a focus group, and individual interviews of the detailers. Results: The experiences of detailing in different contexts were uniformly positive. Learners felt the materials were valuable, and that they would implement them or already had implemented them. In the postsurvey completed by 65 of the 150 detailed learners, 97% percent stated that they changed their practice or had already incorporated the practice change before the detailing. All detailers reported a change in their own practice. Detailers found the teaching materials and detailers’ guide helpful. Some initially expressed a concern about not knowing enough, which lessened with detailing experience. Discussion: Peer detailing seems doable and well received, especially with the availability of high quality, previously prepared, and tested evidence-based content and materials. Detailers were easily recruited and trained to apply their teaching skills in this new format. The amount of time spent in training sessions on detailing training as opposed to content mastery can be adjusted depending on faculty needs.

KW - Academic detailing

KW - Action research

KW - Communication skills

KW - Comparative effectiveness

KW - Development

KW - Evaluation-educational intervention

KW - Faculty

KW - Inter professional education

KW - Knowledge translation

KW - Problem-based/case-based learning

KW - Small group/team learning

KW - Theory-dissemination of innovations

KW - Workplace learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981717746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981717746&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000067

DO - 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000067

M3 - Article

C2 - 27262156

AN - SCOPUS:84981717746

VL - 36

SP - 123

EP - 126

JO - Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

JF - Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

SN - 0894-1912

IS - 2

ER -