Ablation of perimitral flutter following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Impact on outcomes from a randomized study (PROPOSE)

Rong Bai, Luigi Di Biase, Prasant Mohanty, Antonio Dello Russo, Michela Casella, Gemma Pelargonio, Sakis Themistoclakis, Sanghamitra Mohanty, Claude S. Elayi, Javier Sanchez, J. David Burkhardt, Rodney Horton, G. Joseph Gallinghouse, Shane M. Bailey, Aldo Bonso, Salwa Beheiry, Richard H. Hongo, Antonio Raviele, Claudio Tondo, Andrea Natale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

MVI Block vs Trigger Ablation in PMFL. Introduction: Patients with previous ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) may experience recurrence of perimitral flutter (PMFL). These arrhythmias are usually triggered from sources that may also induce AF. This study aims at determining whether ablation of triggers or completing mitral valve isthmus (MVI) block prevents more arrhythmia recurrences. Methods and Results: Sixty-five patients with recurrent PMFL after initial ablation of long standing persistent AF were included in this study. Thirty-two patients were randomized to MVI ablation only (Group 1) and 33 were randomized to cardioversion and repeat pulmonary vein (PV) isolation plus ablation of non-PV triggers (Group 2). MVI bidirectional block was achieved in all but 1 patient from Group 1. In Group 2, reconnection of 17 PVs was detected in 14 patients (42%). With isoproterenol challenge, 44 non-PV trigger sites were identified in 28 patients (85%, 1.57 sites per patient). At 18-month follow-up, 27 patients (84%) from Group 1 had recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias, of whom 15 remained on antiarrhythmic drug (AAD); however, 28 patients from Group 2 (85%, P < 0.0001 vs Group 1) were free from arrhythmia off AAD. The ablation strategy used in Group 2 was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.28, P < 0.001) and an improved arrhythmia-free survival (log rank P < 0.0001). Conclusion: In patients presenting with PMFL after ablation for longstanding persistent AF, MVI block had limited impact on arrhythmia recurrence. On the other hand, elimination of all PV and non-PV triggers achieved higher freedom from atrial arrhythmias at follow-up.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)137-144
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Catheter Ablation
Atrial Fibrillation
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Mitral Valve
Recurrence
Veins
Pulmonary Veins
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
Electric Countershock
Isoproterenol
Tachycardia

Keywords

  • ablation
  • atrial fibrillation
  • atrial flutter
  • perimitral
  • pulmonary vein isolation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

Ablation of perimitral flutter following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation : Impact on outcomes from a randomized study (PROPOSE). / Bai, Rong; Di Biase, Luigi; Mohanty, Prasant; Russo, Antonio Dello; Casella, Michela; Pelargonio, Gemma; Themistoclakis, Sakis; Mohanty, Sanghamitra; Elayi, Claude S.; Sanchez, Javier; Burkhardt, J. David; Horton, Rodney; Gallinghouse, G. Joseph; Bailey, Shane M.; Bonso, Aldo; Beheiry, Salwa; Hongo, Richard H.; Raviele, Antonio; Tondo, Claudio; Natale, Andrea.

In: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, Vol. 23, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 137-144.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bai, R, Di Biase, L, Mohanty, P, Russo, AD, Casella, M, Pelargonio, G, Themistoclakis, S, Mohanty, S, Elayi, CS, Sanchez, J, Burkhardt, JD, Horton, R, Gallinghouse, GJ, Bailey, SM, Bonso, A, Beheiry, S, Hongo, RH, Raviele, A, Tondo, C & Natale, A 2012, 'Ablation of perimitral flutter following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Impact on outcomes from a randomized study (PROPOSE)', Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02182.x
Bai, Rong ; Di Biase, Luigi ; Mohanty, Prasant ; Russo, Antonio Dello ; Casella, Michela ; Pelargonio, Gemma ; Themistoclakis, Sakis ; Mohanty, Sanghamitra ; Elayi, Claude S. ; Sanchez, Javier ; Burkhardt, J. David ; Horton, Rodney ; Gallinghouse, G. Joseph ; Bailey, Shane M. ; Bonso, Aldo ; Beheiry, Salwa ; Hongo, Richard H. ; Raviele, Antonio ; Tondo, Claudio ; Natale, Andrea. / Ablation of perimitral flutter following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation : Impact on outcomes from a randomized study (PROPOSE). In: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 2012 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 137-144.
@article{dc755d4f7fc74f559250371eb936f8c1,
title = "Ablation of perimitral flutter following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Impact on outcomes from a randomized study (PROPOSE)",
abstract = "MVI Block vs Trigger Ablation in PMFL. Introduction: Patients with previous ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) may experience recurrence of perimitral flutter (PMFL). These arrhythmias are usually triggered from sources that may also induce AF. This study aims at determining whether ablation of triggers or completing mitral valve isthmus (MVI) block prevents more arrhythmia recurrences. Methods and Results: Sixty-five patients with recurrent PMFL after initial ablation of long standing persistent AF were included in this study. Thirty-two patients were randomized to MVI ablation only (Group 1) and 33 were randomized to cardioversion and repeat pulmonary vein (PV) isolation plus ablation of non-PV triggers (Group 2). MVI bidirectional block was achieved in all but 1 patient from Group 1. In Group 2, reconnection of 17 PVs was detected in 14 patients (42{\%}). With isoproterenol challenge, 44 non-PV trigger sites were identified in 28 patients (85{\%}, 1.57 sites per patient). At 18-month follow-up, 27 patients (84{\%}) from Group 1 had recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias, of whom 15 remained on antiarrhythmic drug (AAD); however, 28 patients from Group 2 (85{\%}, P < 0.0001 vs Group 1) were free from arrhythmia off AAD. The ablation strategy used in Group 2 was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.10, 95{\%} CI 0.04-0.28, P < 0.001) and an improved arrhythmia-free survival (log rank P < 0.0001). Conclusion: In patients presenting with PMFL after ablation for longstanding persistent AF, MVI block had limited impact on arrhythmia recurrence. On the other hand, elimination of all PV and non-PV triggers achieved higher freedom from atrial arrhythmias at follow-up.",
keywords = "ablation, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, perimitral, pulmonary vein isolation",
author = "Rong Bai and {Di Biase}, Luigi and Prasant Mohanty and Russo, {Antonio Dello} and Michela Casella and Gemma Pelargonio and Sakis Themistoclakis and Sanghamitra Mohanty and Elayi, {Claude S.} and Javier Sanchez and Burkhardt, {J. David} and Rodney Horton and Gallinghouse, {G. Joseph} and Bailey, {Shane M.} and Aldo Bonso and Salwa Beheiry and Hongo, {Richard H.} and Antonio Raviele and Claudio Tondo and Andrea Natale",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02182.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "137--144",
journal = "Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology",
issn = "1045-3873",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ablation of perimitral flutter following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

T2 - Impact on outcomes from a randomized study (PROPOSE)

AU - Bai, Rong

AU - Di Biase, Luigi

AU - Mohanty, Prasant

AU - Russo, Antonio Dello

AU - Casella, Michela

AU - Pelargonio, Gemma

AU - Themistoclakis, Sakis

AU - Mohanty, Sanghamitra

AU - Elayi, Claude S.

AU - Sanchez, Javier

AU - Burkhardt, J. David

AU - Horton, Rodney

AU - Gallinghouse, G. Joseph

AU - Bailey, Shane M.

AU - Bonso, Aldo

AU - Beheiry, Salwa

AU - Hongo, Richard H.

AU - Raviele, Antonio

AU - Tondo, Claudio

AU - Natale, Andrea

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - MVI Block vs Trigger Ablation in PMFL. Introduction: Patients with previous ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) may experience recurrence of perimitral flutter (PMFL). These arrhythmias are usually triggered from sources that may also induce AF. This study aims at determining whether ablation of triggers or completing mitral valve isthmus (MVI) block prevents more arrhythmia recurrences. Methods and Results: Sixty-five patients with recurrent PMFL after initial ablation of long standing persistent AF were included in this study. Thirty-two patients were randomized to MVI ablation only (Group 1) and 33 were randomized to cardioversion and repeat pulmonary vein (PV) isolation plus ablation of non-PV triggers (Group 2). MVI bidirectional block was achieved in all but 1 patient from Group 1. In Group 2, reconnection of 17 PVs was detected in 14 patients (42%). With isoproterenol challenge, 44 non-PV trigger sites were identified in 28 patients (85%, 1.57 sites per patient). At 18-month follow-up, 27 patients (84%) from Group 1 had recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias, of whom 15 remained on antiarrhythmic drug (AAD); however, 28 patients from Group 2 (85%, P < 0.0001 vs Group 1) were free from arrhythmia off AAD. The ablation strategy used in Group 2 was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.28, P < 0.001) and an improved arrhythmia-free survival (log rank P < 0.0001). Conclusion: In patients presenting with PMFL after ablation for longstanding persistent AF, MVI block had limited impact on arrhythmia recurrence. On the other hand, elimination of all PV and non-PV triggers achieved higher freedom from atrial arrhythmias at follow-up.

AB - MVI Block vs Trigger Ablation in PMFL. Introduction: Patients with previous ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) may experience recurrence of perimitral flutter (PMFL). These arrhythmias are usually triggered from sources that may also induce AF. This study aims at determining whether ablation of triggers or completing mitral valve isthmus (MVI) block prevents more arrhythmia recurrences. Methods and Results: Sixty-five patients with recurrent PMFL after initial ablation of long standing persistent AF were included in this study. Thirty-two patients were randomized to MVI ablation only (Group 1) and 33 were randomized to cardioversion and repeat pulmonary vein (PV) isolation plus ablation of non-PV triggers (Group 2). MVI bidirectional block was achieved in all but 1 patient from Group 1. In Group 2, reconnection of 17 PVs was detected in 14 patients (42%). With isoproterenol challenge, 44 non-PV trigger sites were identified in 28 patients (85%, 1.57 sites per patient). At 18-month follow-up, 27 patients (84%) from Group 1 had recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias, of whom 15 remained on antiarrhythmic drug (AAD); however, 28 patients from Group 2 (85%, P < 0.0001 vs Group 1) were free from arrhythmia off AAD. The ablation strategy used in Group 2 was associated with a lower risk of recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.10, 95% CI 0.04-0.28, P < 0.001) and an improved arrhythmia-free survival (log rank P < 0.0001). Conclusion: In patients presenting with PMFL after ablation for longstanding persistent AF, MVI block had limited impact on arrhythmia recurrence. On the other hand, elimination of all PV and non-PV triggers achieved higher freedom from atrial arrhythmias at follow-up.

KW - ablation

KW - atrial fibrillation

KW - atrial flutter

KW - perimitral

KW - pulmonary vein isolation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857030700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857030700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02182.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02182.x

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 137

EP - 144

JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology

SN - 1045-3873

IS - 2

ER -