A proposal for cadaver organ procurement

Routine removal with right of informed refusal

A. J. Matas, J. Arras, J. Muyskens, V. Tellis, F. J. Veith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to alleviate the shortage of vital organs for transplant, we propose a system of routine removal of cadaver organs with an option of informed refusal by family. Unless an individual registered an objection during his or her lifetime, or unless the family objected to the procedure, clinicians would be permitted routinely to salvage vital organs for transplant. Our proposal charts a middle path between the current ineffective policy based on 'encouraged voluntarism' and 'presumed consent' policies that promise effectiveness at the cost of violating traditional ethical and legal principles. In this article, we analyze the failure of the current regime, articulate a policy of routine removal subject to the right of informed refusal, and defend this policy against several possible objections.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)231-244
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law
Volume10
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Tissue and Organ Procurement
Cadaver
voluntarism
shortage
Presumed Consent
regime
Transplants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Matas, A. J., Arras, J., Muyskens, J., Tellis, V., & Veith, F. J. (1985). A proposal for cadaver organ procurement: Routine removal with right of informed refusal. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 10(2), 231-244.

A proposal for cadaver organ procurement : Routine removal with right of informed refusal. / Matas, A. J.; Arras, J.; Muyskens, J.; Tellis, V.; Veith, F. J.

In: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1985, p. 231-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Matas, AJ, Arras, J, Muyskens, J, Tellis, V & Veith, FJ 1985, 'A proposal for cadaver organ procurement: Routine removal with right of informed refusal', Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 231-244.
Matas, A. J. ; Arras, J. ; Muyskens, J. ; Tellis, V. ; Veith, F. J. / A proposal for cadaver organ procurement : Routine removal with right of informed refusal. In: Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 1985 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 231-244.
@article{c586b64587e3491e909fa2689ffc0380,
title = "A proposal for cadaver organ procurement: Routine removal with right of informed refusal",
abstract = "In order to alleviate the shortage of vital organs for transplant, we propose a system of routine removal of cadaver organs with an option of informed refusal by family. Unless an individual registered an objection during his or her lifetime, or unless the family objected to the procedure, clinicians would be permitted routinely to salvage vital organs for transplant. Our proposal charts a middle path between the current ineffective policy based on 'encouraged voluntarism' and 'presumed consent' policies that promise effectiveness at the cost of violating traditional ethical and legal principles. In this article, we analyze the failure of the current regime, articulate a policy of routine removal subject to the right of informed refusal, and defend this policy against several possible objections.",
author = "Matas, {A. J.} and J. Arras and J. Muyskens and V. Tellis and Veith, {F. J.}",
year = "1985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "231--244",
journal = "Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law",
issn = "0361-6878",
publisher = "Duke University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A proposal for cadaver organ procurement

T2 - Routine removal with right of informed refusal

AU - Matas, A. J.

AU - Arras, J.

AU - Muyskens, J.

AU - Tellis, V.

AU - Veith, F. J.

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - In order to alleviate the shortage of vital organs for transplant, we propose a system of routine removal of cadaver organs with an option of informed refusal by family. Unless an individual registered an objection during his or her lifetime, or unless the family objected to the procedure, clinicians would be permitted routinely to salvage vital organs for transplant. Our proposal charts a middle path between the current ineffective policy based on 'encouraged voluntarism' and 'presumed consent' policies that promise effectiveness at the cost of violating traditional ethical and legal principles. In this article, we analyze the failure of the current regime, articulate a policy of routine removal subject to the right of informed refusal, and defend this policy against several possible objections.

AB - In order to alleviate the shortage of vital organs for transplant, we propose a system of routine removal of cadaver organs with an option of informed refusal by family. Unless an individual registered an objection during his or her lifetime, or unless the family objected to the procedure, clinicians would be permitted routinely to salvage vital organs for transplant. Our proposal charts a middle path between the current ineffective policy based on 'encouraged voluntarism' and 'presumed consent' policies that promise effectiveness at the cost of violating traditional ethical and legal principles. In this article, we analyze the failure of the current regime, articulate a policy of routine removal subject to the right of informed refusal, and defend this policy against several possible objections.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0022416331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0022416331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 231

EP - 244

JO - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

JF - Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

SN - 0361-6878

IS - 2

ER -