Inter-laboratory variation as an explanation for varying prevalence estimates of human papillomavirus infection

J. Brandsma, Robert D. Burk, W. D. Lancaster, H. Pfister, M. H. Schiffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has been strongly implicated as a cause of genital neoplasia. Although Southern blot DNA hybridization techniques are regarded as the most accurate means of identifying HPV infection, studies using this technique to measure infection have provided varying estimates of the prevalence of HPV among healthy and diseased groups. This investigation provides a possible explanation for study-to-study differences, by demonstrating interlaboratory variability in the detection and typing of HPV by Southern blot. Four experienced laboratories tested 40 identical, masked samples of DNA extracted from presumed infected and non-infected tissues. The pairwise percentage agreement between the laboratories in judging samples as HPV-positive or negative ranged from 66 to 97%. Among samples judged to contain HPV, agreement as to type ranged from 77 to 96%. We conclude that inter-laboratory differences are an important consideration in any discussion of HPV prevalence estimates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)260-262
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Journal of Cancer
Volume43
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Papillomavirus Infections
Southern Blotting
DNA
Infection
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Inter-laboratory variation as an explanation for varying prevalence estimates of human papillomavirus infection. / Brandsma, J.; Burk, Robert D.; Lancaster, W. D.; Pfister, H.; Schiffman, M. H.

In: International Journal of Cancer, Vol. 43, No. 2, 1989, p. 260-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brandsma, J. ; Burk, Robert D. ; Lancaster, W. D. ; Pfister, H. ; Schiffman, M. H. / Inter-laboratory variation as an explanation for varying prevalence estimates of human papillomavirus infection. In: International Journal of Cancer. 1989 ; Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 260-262.
@article{6ec0df6c6d8b446e9a716d1a72b6f74a,
title = "Inter-laboratory variation as an explanation for varying prevalence estimates of human papillomavirus infection",
abstract = "Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has been strongly implicated as a cause of genital neoplasia. Although Southern blot DNA hybridization techniques are regarded as the most accurate means of identifying HPV infection, studies using this technique to measure infection have provided varying estimates of the prevalence of HPV among healthy and diseased groups. This investigation provides a possible explanation for study-to-study differences, by demonstrating interlaboratory variability in the detection and typing of HPV by Southern blot. Four experienced laboratories tested 40 identical, masked samples of DNA extracted from presumed infected and non-infected tissues. The pairwise percentage agreement between the laboratories in judging samples as HPV-positive or negative ranged from 66 to 97{\%}. Among samples judged to contain HPV, agreement as to type ranged from 77 to 96{\%}. We conclude that inter-laboratory differences are an important consideration in any discussion of HPV prevalence estimates.",
author = "J. Brandsma and Burk, {Robert D.} and Lancaster, {W. D.} and H. Pfister and Schiffman, {M. H.}",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "260--262",
journal = "International Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0020-7136",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inter-laboratory variation as an explanation for varying prevalence estimates of human papillomavirus infection

AU - Brandsma, J.

AU - Burk, Robert D.

AU - Lancaster, W. D.

AU - Pfister, H.

AU - Schiffman, M. H.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has been strongly implicated as a cause of genital neoplasia. Although Southern blot DNA hybridization techniques are regarded as the most accurate means of identifying HPV infection, studies using this technique to measure infection have provided varying estimates of the prevalence of HPV among healthy and diseased groups. This investigation provides a possible explanation for study-to-study differences, by demonstrating interlaboratory variability in the detection and typing of HPV by Southern blot. Four experienced laboratories tested 40 identical, masked samples of DNA extracted from presumed infected and non-infected tissues. The pairwise percentage agreement between the laboratories in judging samples as HPV-positive or negative ranged from 66 to 97%. Among samples judged to contain HPV, agreement as to type ranged from 77 to 96%. We conclude that inter-laboratory differences are an important consideration in any discussion of HPV prevalence estimates.

AB - Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection has been strongly implicated as a cause of genital neoplasia. Although Southern blot DNA hybridization techniques are regarded as the most accurate means of identifying HPV infection, studies using this technique to measure infection have provided varying estimates of the prevalence of HPV among healthy and diseased groups. This investigation provides a possible explanation for study-to-study differences, by demonstrating interlaboratory variability in the detection and typing of HPV by Southern blot. Four experienced laboratories tested 40 identical, masked samples of DNA extracted from presumed infected and non-infected tissues. The pairwise percentage agreement between the laboratories in judging samples as HPV-positive or negative ranged from 66 to 97%. Among samples judged to contain HPV, agreement as to type ranged from 77 to 96%. We conclude that inter-laboratory differences are an important consideration in any discussion of HPV prevalence estimates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024564498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024564498&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2537262

AN - SCOPUS:0024564498

VL - 43

SP - 260

EP - 262

JO - International Journal of Cancer

JF - International Journal of Cancer

SN - 0020-7136

IS - 2

ER -