Wound infections after transplant nephrectomy

W. I. Kohlberg, V. A. Tellis, D. J. Bhat, B. Driscoll, F. J. Veith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wound infections after transplant nephrectomy were analyzed retrospectively. When prophylactic antibiotics were not used, 20% of the closed nephrectomy wounds became infected. Eighty-one percent of the infections were due to staphylococcal organisms. Wounds containing a preexisting focus of infection or those reoperated on more than once within a month prior to nephrectomy are at such high risk for infection that these wounds should be left open for secondary healing. With the use of prophylactic cefazolin sodium, in the immediate preoperative and postoperative period, no wound infections have occurred in 18 closed transplant nephrectomy wounds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)645-646
Number of pages2
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume115
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1980

Fingerprint

Wound Infection
Nephrectomy
Transplants
Wounds and Injuries
Preoperative Period
Cefazolin
Infection
Postoperative Period
Anti-Bacterial Agents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Kohlberg, W. I., Tellis, V. A., Bhat, D. J., Driscoll, B., & Veith, F. J. (1980). Wound infections after transplant nephrectomy. Archives of Surgery, 115(5), 645-646.

Wound infections after transplant nephrectomy. / Kohlberg, W. I.; Tellis, V. A.; Bhat, D. J.; Driscoll, B.; Veith, F. J.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 115, No. 5, 1980, p. 645-646.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kohlberg, WI, Tellis, VA, Bhat, DJ, Driscoll, B & Veith, FJ 1980, 'Wound infections after transplant nephrectomy', Archives of Surgery, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 645-646.
Kohlberg WI, Tellis VA, Bhat DJ, Driscoll B, Veith FJ. Wound infections after transplant nephrectomy. Archives of Surgery. 1980;115(5):645-646.
Kohlberg, W. I. ; Tellis, V. A. ; Bhat, D. J. ; Driscoll, B. ; Veith, F. J. / Wound infections after transplant nephrectomy. In: Archives of Surgery. 1980 ; Vol. 115, No. 5. pp. 645-646.
@article{e84b69538e30467fbe18651a84ba5ad2,
title = "Wound infections after transplant nephrectomy",
abstract = "Wound infections after transplant nephrectomy were analyzed retrospectively. When prophylactic antibiotics were not used, 20{\%} of the closed nephrectomy wounds became infected. Eighty-one percent of the infections were due to staphylococcal organisms. Wounds containing a preexisting focus of infection or those reoperated on more than once within a month prior to nephrectomy are at such high risk for infection that these wounds should be left open for secondary healing. With the use of prophylactic cefazolin sodium, in the immediate preoperative and postoperative period, no wound infections have occurred in 18 closed transplant nephrectomy wounds.",
author = "Kohlberg, {W. I.} and Tellis, {V. A.} and Bhat, {D. J.} and B. Driscoll and Veith, {F. J.}",
year = "1980",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "645--646",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wound infections after transplant nephrectomy

AU - Kohlberg, W. I.

AU - Tellis, V. A.

AU - Bhat, D. J.

AU - Driscoll, B.

AU - Veith, F. J.

PY - 1980

Y1 - 1980

N2 - Wound infections after transplant nephrectomy were analyzed retrospectively. When prophylactic antibiotics were not used, 20% of the closed nephrectomy wounds became infected. Eighty-one percent of the infections were due to staphylococcal organisms. Wounds containing a preexisting focus of infection or those reoperated on more than once within a month prior to nephrectomy are at such high risk for infection that these wounds should be left open for secondary healing. With the use of prophylactic cefazolin sodium, in the immediate preoperative and postoperative period, no wound infections have occurred in 18 closed transplant nephrectomy wounds.

AB - Wound infections after transplant nephrectomy were analyzed retrospectively. When prophylactic antibiotics were not used, 20% of the closed nephrectomy wounds became infected. Eighty-one percent of the infections were due to staphylococcal organisms. Wounds containing a preexisting focus of infection or those reoperated on more than once within a month prior to nephrectomy are at such high risk for infection that these wounds should be left open for secondary healing. With the use of prophylactic cefazolin sodium, in the immediate preoperative and postoperative period, no wound infections have occurred in 18 closed transplant nephrectomy wounds.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018888246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018888246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6990895

AN - SCOPUS:0018888246

VL - 115

SP - 645

EP - 646

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 5

ER -