Workforce, Workload, and Burnout Among Intensivists and Advanced Practice Providers: A Narrative Review

Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine (ALCCM) Task Force of the Society of the Critical Care Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess-by literature review and expert consensus-workforce, workload, and burnout considerations among intensivists and advanced practice providers. DESIGN: Data were synthesized from monthly expert consensus and literature review. SETTING: Workforce and Workload section workgroup of the Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine Task Force. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multidisciplinary care teams led by intensivists are an essential component of critical care delivery. Advanced practice providers (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) are progressively being integrated into ICU practice models. The ever-increasing number of patients with complex, life-threatening diseases, concentration of ICU beds in few centralized hospitals, expansion of specialty ICU services, and desire for 24/7 availability have contributed to growing intensivist staffing concerns. Such staffing challenges may negatively impact practitioner wellness, team perception of care quality, time available for teaching, and length of stay when the patient to intensivist ratio is greater than or equal to 15. Enhanced team communication and reduction of practice variation are important factors for improved patient outcomes. A diverse workforce adds value and enrichment to the overall work environment. Formal succession planning for ICU leaders is crucial to the success of critical care organizations. Implementation of a continuous 24/7 ICU coverage care model in high-acuity, high-volume centers should be based on patient-centered outcomes. High levels of burnout syndrome are common among intensivists. Prospective analyses of interventions to decrease burnout within the ICU setting are limited. However, organizational interventions are felt to be more effective than those directed at individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care workforce and staffing models are myriad and based on several factors including local culture and resources, ICU organization, and strategies to reduce burden on the ICU provider workforce. Prospective studies to assess and avoid the burnout syndrome among intensivists and advanced practice providers are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)550-557
Number of pages8
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume47
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Critical Care
Workload
Consensus
Organizations
Physician Assistants
Nurse Practitioners
Quality of Health Care
Advisory Committees
Length of Stay
Teaching
Communication
Medicine
Prospective Studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine (ALCCM) Task Force of the Society of the Critical Care Medicine (2019). Workforce, Workload, and Burnout Among Intensivists and Advanced Practice Providers: A Narrative Review. Critical care medicine, 47(4), 550-557. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003637

Workforce, Workload, and Burnout Among Intensivists and Advanced Practice Providers : A Narrative Review. / Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine (ALCCM) Task Force of the Society of the Critical Care Medicine.

In: Critical care medicine, Vol. 47, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 550-557.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine (ALCCM) Task Force of the Society of the Critical Care Medicine 2019, 'Workforce, Workload, and Burnout Among Intensivists and Advanced Practice Providers: A Narrative Review', Critical care medicine, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 550-557. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003637
Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine (ALCCM) Task Force of the Society of the Critical Care Medicine. Workforce, Workload, and Burnout Among Intensivists and Advanced Practice Providers: A Narrative Review. Critical care medicine. 2019 Apr 1;47(4):550-557. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003637
Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine (ALCCM) Task Force of the Society of the Critical Care Medicine. / Workforce, Workload, and Burnout Among Intensivists and Advanced Practice Providers : A Narrative Review. In: Critical care medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 47, No. 4. pp. 550-557.
@article{80f6b6e57a874fa882b227cc99c26857,
title = "Workforce, Workload, and Burnout Among Intensivists and Advanced Practice Providers: A Narrative Review",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To assess-by literature review and expert consensus-workforce, workload, and burnout considerations among intensivists and advanced practice providers. DESIGN: Data were synthesized from monthly expert consensus and literature review. SETTING: Workforce and Workload section workgroup of the Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine Task Force. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multidisciplinary care teams led by intensivists are an essential component of critical care delivery. Advanced practice providers (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) are progressively being integrated into ICU practice models. The ever-increasing number of patients with complex, life-threatening diseases, concentration of ICU beds in few centralized hospitals, expansion of specialty ICU services, and desire for 24/7 availability have contributed to growing intensivist staffing concerns. Such staffing challenges may negatively impact practitioner wellness, team perception of care quality, time available for teaching, and length of stay when the patient to intensivist ratio is greater than or equal to 15. Enhanced team communication and reduction of practice variation are important factors for improved patient outcomes. A diverse workforce adds value and enrichment to the overall work environment. Formal succession planning for ICU leaders is crucial to the success of critical care organizations. Implementation of a continuous 24/7 ICU coverage care model in high-acuity, high-volume centers should be based on patient-centered outcomes. High levels of burnout syndrome are common among intensivists. Prospective analyses of interventions to decrease burnout within the ICU setting are limited. However, organizational interventions are felt to be more effective than those directed at individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care workforce and staffing models are myriad and based on several factors including local culture and resources, ICU organization, and strategies to reduce burden on the ICU provider workforce. Prospective studies to assess and avoid the burnout syndrome among intensivists and advanced practice providers are needed.",
author = "{Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine (ALCCM) Task Force of the Society of the Critical Care Medicine} and Pastores, {Stephen M.} and Vladimir Kvetan and Coopersmith, {Craig M.} and Farmer, {J. Christopher} and Curtis Sessler and Christman, {John W.} and Rhonda D'Agostino and Jose Diaz-Gomez and Gregg, {Sara R.} and Khan, {Roozehra A.} and Kapu, {April N.} and Henry Masur and Gargi Mehta and Jason Moore and Oropello, {John M.} and Kristen Price",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/CCM.0000000000003637",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "550--557",
journal = "Critical Care Medicine",
issn = "0090-3493",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Workforce, Workload, and Burnout Among Intensivists and Advanced Practice Providers

T2 - A Narrative Review

AU - Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine (ALCCM) Task Force of the Society of the Critical Care Medicine

AU - Pastores, Stephen M.

AU - Kvetan, Vladimir

AU - Coopersmith, Craig M.

AU - Farmer, J. Christopher

AU - Sessler, Curtis

AU - Christman, John W.

AU - D'Agostino, Rhonda

AU - Diaz-Gomez, Jose

AU - Gregg, Sara R.

AU - Khan, Roozehra A.

AU - Kapu, April N.

AU - Masur, Henry

AU - Mehta, Gargi

AU - Moore, Jason

AU - Oropello, John M.

AU - Price, Kristen

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To assess-by literature review and expert consensus-workforce, workload, and burnout considerations among intensivists and advanced practice providers. DESIGN: Data were synthesized from monthly expert consensus and literature review. SETTING: Workforce and Workload section workgroup of the Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine Task Force. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multidisciplinary care teams led by intensivists are an essential component of critical care delivery. Advanced practice providers (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) are progressively being integrated into ICU practice models. The ever-increasing number of patients with complex, life-threatening diseases, concentration of ICU beds in few centralized hospitals, expansion of specialty ICU services, and desire for 24/7 availability have contributed to growing intensivist staffing concerns. Such staffing challenges may negatively impact practitioner wellness, team perception of care quality, time available for teaching, and length of stay when the patient to intensivist ratio is greater than or equal to 15. Enhanced team communication and reduction of practice variation are important factors for improved patient outcomes. A diverse workforce adds value and enrichment to the overall work environment. Formal succession planning for ICU leaders is crucial to the success of critical care organizations. Implementation of a continuous 24/7 ICU coverage care model in high-acuity, high-volume centers should be based on patient-centered outcomes. High levels of burnout syndrome are common among intensivists. Prospective analyses of interventions to decrease burnout within the ICU setting are limited. However, organizational interventions are felt to be more effective than those directed at individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care workforce and staffing models are myriad and based on several factors including local culture and resources, ICU organization, and strategies to reduce burden on the ICU provider workforce. Prospective studies to assess and avoid the burnout syndrome among intensivists and advanced practice providers are needed.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To assess-by literature review and expert consensus-workforce, workload, and burnout considerations among intensivists and advanced practice providers. DESIGN: Data were synthesized from monthly expert consensus and literature review. SETTING: Workforce and Workload section workgroup of the Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine Task Force. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multidisciplinary care teams led by intensivists are an essential component of critical care delivery. Advanced practice providers (nurse practitioners and physician assistants) are progressively being integrated into ICU practice models. The ever-increasing number of patients with complex, life-threatening diseases, concentration of ICU beds in few centralized hospitals, expansion of specialty ICU services, and desire for 24/7 availability have contributed to growing intensivist staffing concerns. Such staffing challenges may negatively impact practitioner wellness, team perception of care quality, time available for teaching, and length of stay when the patient to intensivist ratio is greater than or equal to 15. Enhanced team communication and reduction of practice variation are important factors for improved patient outcomes. A diverse workforce adds value and enrichment to the overall work environment. Formal succession planning for ICU leaders is crucial to the success of critical care organizations. Implementation of a continuous 24/7 ICU coverage care model in high-acuity, high-volume centers should be based on patient-centered outcomes. High levels of burnout syndrome are common among intensivists. Prospective analyses of interventions to decrease burnout within the ICU setting are limited. However, organizational interventions are felt to be more effective than those directed at individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Critical care workforce and staffing models are myriad and based on several factors including local culture and resources, ICU organization, and strategies to reduce burden on the ICU provider workforce. Prospective studies to assess and avoid the burnout syndrome among intensivists and advanced practice providers are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063281630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063281630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003637

DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003637

M3 - Article

C2 - 30688716

AN - SCOPUS:85063281630

VL - 47

SP - 550

EP - 557

JO - Critical Care Medicine

JF - Critical Care Medicine

SN - 0090-3493

IS - 4

ER -