Why tell? Serostatus disclosure and HIV stigma among HIV seropositive Asians and Pacific islander men who have sex with men in New York City

Ezer Kang, Bruce D. Rapkin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Many persons living with HIV wrestle with the dilemma of whether or not to disclose their serostatus. The benefits of being supported by a network of confidants are weighed against the risks of being rejected and ostracized by family and peers. As such, many persons living with HIV/AIDS continually struggle to fulfill competing needs to share information about their illness and to preserve privacy or maintain control over who, what, and when to disclose their serostatus (Derlega, Lovejoy, & Winstead, 1998). The timing of selective serostatus disclosure can be influenced by disease progression (Mansergh, Marks & Simoni, 1995), length of HIV diagnosis (Emlet, 2006), cultural norms (Simoni et al., 1995; Mason, Marks, Simoni, Ruiz, & Richardson, 1995), relational commitment (Perry et al., 1994), and the number of sexual partners (Marks, et al., 1992).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHealth Issues Confronting Minority Men Who Have Sex with Men
PublisherSpringer New York
Pages197-217
Number of pages21
ISBN (Print)9780387745381
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why tell? Serostatus disclosure and HIV stigma among HIV seropositive Asians and Pacific islander men who have sex with men in New York City'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this