Who should be referred for a fistula? A survey of nephrologists

Wang Xi, Jennifer MacNab, Charmaine E. Lok, Timmy C. Lee, Ivan D. Maya, Michele H. Mokrzycki, Louise M. Moist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. There is marked variation in the use of the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) across programmes, regions and countries not explained by differences in patient demographics or comorbidities. The lack of clear criteria of who should or should not get a fistula may contribute to this, as well as barriers to creating AVFs.Methods. We conducted a survey of Canadian and American nephrologists to assess the patient variables considered to determine the timing and type of access requested. Perceived barriers and absolute contraindications to access were also collected.Results. An immediate referral for a fistula was more highly preferred when patients are <65 years old, have minimal comorbidities or have no history of failed accesses. In older patients, and in those with increased comorbidities or a previously failed fistula, US nephrologists selected arteriovenous grafts as an alternative to the fistula, while Canadian nephrologists selected primarily catheters. Referral for vascular mapping was more common in the USA than in Canada. Gender did not influence the timing or the type of access. Perceived barriers to establishing a mature fistula included patient refusal for creation (77%) or cannulation (58%), delay in decision regarding dialysis modality (71%), wait time for surgical creation (55%) and high failure-to-mature rate (52%). We found that 27% of Canadian and 43% of American nephrologists indicated no absolute contraindications for permanent vascular access.Conclusions. This study demonstrated marked variability in timing and criteria used to select patients for referral for a vascular access between nephrologists practicing within Canada and the USA. Establishing minimal eligibility criteria for fistulae is an important area of future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2644-2651
Number of pages8
JournalNephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Volume25
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Fistula
Blood Vessels
Comorbidity
Referral and Consultation
Canada
Arteriovenous Fistula
Catheterization
Nephrologists
Surveys and Questionnaires
Dialysis
Catheters
Demography
Transplants

Keywords

  • arteriovenous fistula
  • central venous catheter
  • haemodialysis
  • vascular access

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nephrology
  • Transplantation
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Xi, W., MacNab, J., Lok, C. E., Lee, T. C., Maya, I. D., Mokrzycki, M. H., & Moist, L. M. (2010). Who should be referred for a fistula? A survey of nephrologists. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 25(8), 2644-2651. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq064

Who should be referred for a fistula? A survey of nephrologists. / Xi, Wang; MacNab, Jennifer; Lok, Charmaine E.; Lee, Timmy C.; Maya, Ivan D.; Mokrzycki, Michele H.; Moist, Louise M.

In: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol. 25, No. 8, 2010, p. 2644-2651.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Xi, W, MacNab, J, Lok, CE, Lee, TC, Maya, ID, Mokrzycki, MH & Moist, LM 2010, 'Who should be referred for a fistula? A survey of nephrologists', Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 2644-2651. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfq064
Xi, Wang ; MacNab, Jennifer ; Lok, Charmaine E. ; Lee, Timmy C. ; Maya, Ivan D. ; Mokrzycki, Michele H. ; Moist, Louise M. / Who should be referred for a fistula? A survey of nephrologists. In: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 8. pp. 2644-2651.
@article{012a812895e34e2caca50338cb399de2,
title = "Who should be referred for a fistula? A survey of nephrologists",
abstract = "Background. There is marked variation in the use of the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) across programmes, regions and countries not explained by differences in patient demographics or comorbidities. The lack of clear criteria of who should or should not get a fistula may contribute to this, as well as barriers to creating AVFs.Methods. We conducted a survey of Canadian and American nephrologists to assess the patient variables considered to determine the timing and type of access requested. Perceived barriers and absolute contraindications to access were also collected.Results. An immediate referral for a fistula was more highly preferred when patients are <65 years old, have minimal comorbidities or have no history of failed accesses. In older patients, and in those with increased comorbidities or a previously failed fistula, US nephrologists selected arteriovenous grafts as an alternative to the fistula, while Canadian nephrologists selected primarily catheters. Referral for vascular mapping was more common in the USA than in Canada. Gender did not influence the timing or the type of access. Perceived barriers to establishing a mature fistula included patient refusal for creation (77{\%}) or cannulation (58{\%}), delay in decision regarding dialysis modality (71{\%}), wait time for surgical creation (55{\%}) and high failure-to-mature rate (52{\%}). We found that 27{\%} of Canadian and 43{\%} of American nephrologists indicated no absolute contraindications for permanent vascular access.Conclusions. This study demonstrated marked variability in timing and criteria used to select patients for referral for a vascular access between nephrologists practicing within Canada and the USA. Establishing minimal eligibility criteria for fistulae is an important area of future research.",
keywords = "arteriovenous fistula, central venous catheter, haemodialysis, vascular access",
author = "Wang Xi and Jennifer MacNab and Lok, {Charmaine E.} and Lee, {Timmy C.} and Maya, {Ivan D.} and Mokrzycki, {Michele H.} and Moist, {Louise M.}",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1093/ndt/gfq064",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "2644--2651",
journal = "Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association",
issn = "0931-0509",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who should be referred for a fistula? A survey of nephrologists

AU - Xi, Wang

AU - MacNab, Jennifer

AU - Lok, Charmaine E.

AU - Lee, Timmy C.

AU - Maya, Ivan D.

AU - Mokrzycki, Michele H.

AU - Moist, Louise M.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Background. There is marked variation in the use of the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) across programmes, regions and countries not explained by differences in patient demographics or comorbidities. The lack of clear criteria of who should or should not get a fistula may contribute to this, as well as barriers to creating AVFs.Methods. We conducted a survey of Canadian and American nephrologists to assess the patient variables considered to determine the timing and type of access requested. Perceived barriers and absolute contraindications to access were also collected.Results. An immediate referral for a fistula was more highly preferred when patients are <65 years old, have minimal comorbidities or have no history of failed accesses. In older patients, and in those with increased comorbidities or a previously failed fistula, US nephrologists selected arteriovenous grafts as an alternative to the fistula, while Canadian nephrologists selected primarily catheters. Referral for vascular mapping was more common in the USA than in Canada. Gender did not influence the timing or the type of access. Perceived barriers to establishing a mature fistula included patient refusal for creation (77%) or cannulation (58%), delay in decision regarding dialysis modality (71%), wait time for surgical creation (55%) and high failure-to-mature rate (52%). We found that 27% of Canadian and 43% of American nephrologists indicated no absolute contraindications for permanent vascular access.Conclusions. This study demonstrated marked variability in timing and criteria used to select patients for referral for a vascular access between nephrologists practicing within Canada and the USA. Establishing minimal eligibility criteria for fistulae is an important area of future research.

AB - Background. There is marked variation in the use of the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) across programmes, regions and countries not explained by differences in patient demographics or comorbidities. The lack of clear criteria of who should or should not get a fistula may contribute to this, as well as barriers to creating AVFs.Methods. We conducted a survey of Canadian and American nephrologists to assess the patient variables considered to determine the timing and type of access requested. Perceived barriers and absolute contraindications to access were also collected.Results. An immediate referral for a fistula was more highly preferred when patients are <65 years old, have minimal comorbidities or have no history of failed accesses. In older patients, and in those with increased comorbidities or a previously failed fistula, US nephrologists selected arteriovenous grafts as an alternative to the fistula, while Canadian nephrologists selected primarily catheters. Referral for vascular mapping was more common in the USA than in Canada. Gender did not influence the timing or the type of access. Perceived barriers to establishing a mature fistula included patient refusal for creation (77%) or cannulation (58%), delay in decision regarding dialysis modality (71%), wait time for surgical creation (55%) and high failure-to-mature rate (52%). We found that 27% of Canadian and 43% of American nephrologists indicated no absolute contraindications for permanent vascular access.Conclusions. This study demonstrated marked variability in timing and criteria used to select patients for referral for a vascular access between nephrologists practicing within Canada and the USA. Establishing minimal eligibility criteria for fistulae is an important area of future research.

KW - arteriovenous fistula

KW - central venous catheter

KW - haemodialysis

KW - vascular access

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954797517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954797517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/ndt/gfq064

DO - 10.1093/ndt/gfq064

M3 - Article

C2 - 20176614

AN - SCOPUS:77954797517

VL - 25

SP - 2644

EP - 2651

JO - Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association

JF - Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association

SN - 0931-0509

IS - 8

ER -