Which is safer: A traditional epidural or a combined spinal epidural?

Juan Davila-Velazquez, Jeffrey Bernstein

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

A 32-year-old primigravida at 5-cm dilatation, with regular contractions and intact membranes, is admitted to the labor floor in active labor. She is obese (body mass index [BMI] 41) and has a Mallampati class III airway. The rest of her medical history is unremarkable. After addressing her questions and concerns and signing consent, you perform a traditional epidural with loss of resistance to air, 6 cm from the skin. Aspiration and test dose are negative. The epidural catheter is loaded with 10 ml bupivacaine, 0.125 %, and fentanyl, 50 µ(mu)g. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with both continuous and demand dosing is initiated before you leave the room.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationYou're Wrong, I'm Right
Subtitle of host publicationDueling Authors Reexamine Classic Teachings in Anesthesia
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages153-154
Number of pages2
ISBN (Electronic)9783319431697
ISBN (Print)9783319431673
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Keywords

  • Combined spinal epidural (CSE)
  • Emergency cesarean delivery
  • Epidural anesthesia
  • Obstetric anesthesia
  • Post-dural puncture headache

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Which is safer: A traditional epidural or a combined spinal epidural?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this