What is the best measure of adiposity change in growing children

BMI, BMI %, BMI z-score or BMI centile?

T. J. Cole, M. S. Faith, A. Pietrobelli, Moonseong Heo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

405 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Weight control programs for obese children monitor change in body mass index (BMI) adjusted for age. However, change can be measured in several ways: raw (kg/m2) units, percentage, z-scores or centiles. The suitability of the different measures is not known. Aim: To identify the optimal BMI measure for change, whose short-term variability is most consistent for children across the spectrum of adiposity. Setting: An Italian kindergarten. Subjects: A total of 135 (66 female) children aged 29-68 months at baseline, with BMI measured three times over a 9-month period. Methods: Each child's short-term variability in adiposity was summarized by the standard deviation (s.d.) of BMI and BMI % adjusted for age, and BMI z-score and BMI centile. The s.d.'s were then compared in obese and nonobese children, and also correlated with each child's baseline BMI z-score. Results: The within-child s.d.s of BMI z-score and BMI centile were significantly smaller in obese than nonobese children, while the s.d.s of BMI and BMI % were similar in the two groups. Also, the within-child s.d.s of z-score and centile, and to a lesser extent BMI %, were significantly inversely correlated with baseline z-score, whereas the s.d. of BMI was not. The changes in adiposity over time, as assessed by the four measures, were very highly correlated with each other, particularly for BMI with BMI %. Discussion: Even though BMI z-score is optimal for assessing adiposity on a single occasion, it is not necessarily the best scale for measuring change in adiposity, as the within-child variability over time depends on the child's level of adiposity. Better alternatives are BMI itself or BMI %. Our results underscore the importance of using a relatively stable method to assess adiposity change when following children at risk of obesity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-425
Number of pages7
JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume59
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Adiposity
adiposity
body mass index
Body Mass Index
kindergarten
weight control programs

Keywords

  • Body composition
  • Body mass index
  • Child obesity
  • Growth
  • Weight prevention

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Food Science

Cite this

What is the best measure of adiposity change in growing children : BMI, BMI %, BMI z-score or BMI centile? / Cole, T. J.; Faith, M. S.; Pietrobelli, A.; Heo, Moonseong.

In: European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 59, No. 3, 03.2005, p. 419-425.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ea6d033a9f884853b8d6f391a9517599,
title = "What is the best measure of adiposity change in growing children: BMI, BMI {\%}, BMI z-score or BMI centile?",
abstract = "Background: Weight control programs for obese children monitor change in body mass index (BMI) adjusted for age. However, change can be measured in several ways: raw (kg/m2) units, percentage, z-scores or centiles. The suitability of the different measures is not known. Aim: To identify the optimal BMI measure for change, whose short-term variability is most consistent for children across the spectrum of adiposity. Setting: An Italian kindergarten. Subjects: A total of 135 (66 female) children aged 29-68 months at baseline, with BMI measured three times over a 9-month period. Methods: Each child's short-term variability in adiposity was summarized by the standard deviation (s.d.) of BMI and BMI {\%} adjusted for age, and BMI z-score and BMI centile. The s.d.'s were then compared in obese and nonobese children, and also correlated with each child's baseline BMI z-score. Results: The within-child s.d.s of BMI z-score and BMI centile were significantly smaller in obese than nonobese children, while the s.d.s of BMI and BMI {\%} were similar in the two groups. Also, the within-child s.d.s of z-score and centile, and to a lesser extent BMI {\%}, were significantly inversely correlated with baseline z-score, whereas the s.d. of BMI was not. The changes in adiposity over time, as assessed by the four measures, were very highly correlated with each other, particularly for BMI with BMI {\%}. Discussion: Even though BMI z-score is optimal for assessing adiposity on a single occasion, it is not necessarily the best scale for measuring change in adiposity, as the within-child variability over time depends on the child's level of adiposity. Better alternatives are BMI itself or BMI {\%}. Our results underscore the importance of using a relatively stable method to assess adiposity change when following children at risk of obesity.",
keywords = "Body composition, Body mass index, Child obesity, Growth, Weight prevention",
author = "Cole, {T. J.} and Faith, {M. S.} and A. Pietrobelli and Moonseong Heo",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602090",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "59",
pages = "419--425",
journal = "European Journal of Clinical Nutrition",
issn = "0954-3007",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the best measure of adiposity change in growing children

T2 - BMI, BMI %, BMI z-score or BMI centile?

AU - Cole, T. J.

AU - Faith, M. S.

AU - Pietrobelli, A.

AU - Heo, Moonseong

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Background: Weight control programs for obese children monitor change in body mass index (BMI) adjusted for age. However, change can be measured in several ways: raw (kg/m2) units, percentage, z-scores or centiles. The suitability of the different measures is not known. Aim: To identify the optimal BMI measure for change, whose short-term variability is most consistent for children across the spectrum of adiposity. Setting: An Italian kindergarten. Subjects: A total of 135 (66 female) children aged 29-68 months at baseline, with BMI measured three times over a 9-month period. Methods: Each child's short-term variability in adiposity was summarized by the standard deviation (s.d.) of BMI and BMI % adjusted for age, and BMI z-score and BMI centile. The s.d.'s were then compared in obese and nonobese children, and also correlated with each child's baseline BMI z-score. Results: The within-child s.d.s of BMI z-score and BMI centile were significantly smaller in obese than nonobese children, while the s.d.s of BMI and BMI % were similar in the two groups. Also, the within-child s.d.s of z-score and centile, and to a lesser extent BMI %, were significantly inversely correlated with baseline z-score, whereas the s.d. of BMI was not. The changes in adiposity over time, as assessed by the four measures, were very highly correlated with each other, particularly for BMI with BMI %. Discussion: Even though BMI z-score is optimal for assessing adiposity on a single occasion, it is not necessarily the best scale for measuring change in adiposity, as the within-child variability over time depends on the child's level of adiposity. Better alternatives are BMI itself or BMI %. Our results underscore the importance of using a relatively stable method to assess adiposity change when following children at risk of obesity.

AB - Background: Weight control programs for obese children monitor change in body mass index (BMI) adjusted for age. However, change can be measured in several ways: raw (kg/m2) units, percentage, z-scores or centiles. The suitability of the different measures is not known. Aim: To identify the optimal BMI measure for change, whose short-term variability is most consistent for children across the spectrum of adiposity. Setting: An Italian kindergarten. Subjects: A total of 135 (66 female) children aged 29-68 months at baseline, with BMI measured three times over a 9-month period. Methods: Each child's short-term variability in adiposity was summarized by the standard deviation (s.d.) of BMI and BMI % adjusted for age, and BMI z-score and BMI centile. The s.d.'s were then compared in obese and nonobese children, and also correlated with each child's baseline BMI z-score. Results: The within-child s.d.s of BMI z-score and BMI centile were significantly smaller in obese than nonobese children, while the s.d.s of BMI and BMI % were similar in the two groups. Also, the within-child s.d.s of z-score and centile, and to a lesser extent BMI %, were significantly inversely correlated with baseline z-score, whereas the s.d. of BMI was not. The changes in adiposity over time, as assessed by the four measures, were very highly correlated with each other, particularly for BMI with BMI %. Discussion: Even though BMI z-score is optimal for assessing adiposity on a single occasion, it is not necessarily the best scale for measuring change in adiposity, as the within-child variability over time depends on the child's level of adiposity. Better alternatives are BMI itself or BMI %. Our results underscore the importance of using a relatively stable method to assess adiposity change when following children at risk of obesity.

KW - Body composition

KW - Body mass index

KW - Child obesity

KW - Growth

KW - Weight prevention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15544363770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15544363770&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602090

DO - 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602090

M3 - Article

VL - 59

SP - 419

EP - 425

JO - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

JF - European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

SN - 0954-3007

IS - 3

ER -