What is the best femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis

Alexis Colvin, Charu Sharma, Michael K. Parides, Jonathan Glashow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Several methods are available for fixing the femoral side of a hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction and the best method is unclear. Biomechanical studies have shown varying results with regard to fixation failure. Questions/purposes: We asked whether there were any differences with regard to graft failures and functional outcome measures with differing methods of femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in ACL reconstruction. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Controlled Trial Register databases with regard to interference screw fixation (aperture fixation) versus noninterference screw fixation (fixation away from the joint line). A meta-analysis was performed of those studies reporting on surgical failures and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score. Eight studies met our inclusion criteria of Level I or II evidence. Results: Use of interference screws for femoral fixation resulted in a trend toward decreased risk of surgical failure (relative risk = 0.57; confidence interval, 0.1678-1.0918). When only Level I trials were evaluated, the same trend was noted toward a decreased risk of surgical failures using femoral interference screws (relative risk = 0.52; confidence interval, 0.1794-1.3122). There was no difference in postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score with Level I and II studies (relative risk = 0.9940; confidence interval, 0.6230-1.5860) or only Level I studies (relative risk = 1.0380; confidence interval, 0.6381-1.6886). Conclusions: The literature suggests a trend toward decreased surgical failures with femoral fixation at the joint line with an interference screw. However, there is no difference when postoperative functional outcomes are compared. Future studies are needed with standardized fixation methods and outcomes assessment to determine the importance of femoral fixation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1075-1081
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
Volume469
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Autografts
Thigh
Meta-Analysis
Confidence Intervals
Documentation
Knee
Joints
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
PubMed
MEDLINE
Databases
Transplants

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

What is the best femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis. / Colvin, Alexis; Sharma, Charu; Parides, Michael K.; Glashow, Jonathan.

In: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Vol. 469, No. 4, 01.04.2011, p. 1075-1081.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f62570d8b35343a5807b6fc270dd3e86,
title = "What is the best femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background: Several methods are available for fixing the femoral side of a hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction and the best method is unclear. Biomechanical studies have shown varying results with regard to fixation failure. Questions/purposes: We asked whether there were any differences with regard to graft failures and functional outcome measures with differing methods of femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in ACL reconstruction. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Controlled Trial Register databases with regard to interference screw fixation (aperture fixation) versus noninterference screw fixation (fixation away from the joint line). A meta-analysis was performed of those studies reporting on surgical failures and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score. Eight studies met our inclusion criteria of Level I or II evidence. Results: Use of interference screws for femoral fixation resulted in a trend toward decreased risk of surgical failure (relative risk = 0.57; confidence interval, 0.1678-1.0918). When only Level I trials were evaluated, the same trend was noted toward a decreased risk of surgical failures using femoral interference screws (relative risk = 0.52; confidence interval, 0.1794-1.3122). There was no difference in postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score with Level I and II studies (relative risk = 0.9940; confidence interval, 0.6230-1.5860) or only Level I studies (relative risk = 1.0380; confidence interval, 0.6381-1.6886). Conclusions: The literature suggests a trend toward decreased surgical failures with femoral fixation at the joint line with an interference screw. However, there is no difference when postoperative functional outcomes are compared. Future studies are needed with standardized fixation methods and outcomes assessment to determine the importance of femoral fixation.",
author = "Alexis Colvin and Charu Sharma and Parides, {Michael K.} and Jonathan Glashow",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11999-010-1662-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "469",
pages = "1075--1081",
journal = "Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research",
issn = "0009-921X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is the best femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis

AU - Colvin, Alexis

AU - Sharma, Charu

AU - Parides, Michael K.

AU - Glashow, Jonathan

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - Background: Several methods are available for fixing the femoral side of a hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction and the best method is unclear. Biomechanical studies have shown varying results with regard to fixation failure. Questions/purposes: We asked whether there were any differences with regard to graft failures and functional outcome measures with differing methods of femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in ACL reconstruction. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Controlled Trial Register databases with regard to interference screw fixation (aperture fixation) versus noninterference screw fixation (fixation away from the joint line). A meta-analysis was performed of those studies reporting on surgical failures and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score. Eight studies met our inclusion criteria of Level I or II evidence. Results: Use of interference screws for femoral fixation resulted in a trend toward decreased risk of surgical failure (relative risk = 0.57; confidence interval, 0.1678-1.0918). When only Level I trials were evaluated, the same trend was noted toward a decreased risk of surgical failures using femoral interference screws (relative risk = 0.52; confidence interval, 0.1794-1.3122). There was no difference in postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score with Level I and II studies (relative risk = 0.9940; confidence interval, 0.6230-1.5860) or only Level I studies (relative risk = 1.0380; confidence interval, 0.6381-1.6886). Conclusions: The literature suggests a trend toward decreased surgical failures with femoral fixation at the joint line with an interference screw. However, there is no difference when postoperative functional outcomes are compared. Future studies are needed with standardized fixation methods and outcomes assessment to determine the importance of femoral fixation.

AB - Background: Several methods are available for fixing the femoral side of a hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction and the best method is unclear. Biomechanical studies have shown varying results with regard to fixation failure. Questions/purposes: We asked whether there were any differences with regard to graft failures and functional outcome measures with differing methods of femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in ACL reconstruction. Methods: We systematically reviewed the literature using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Controlled Trial Register databases with regard to interference screw fixation (aperture fixation) versus noninterference screw fixation (fixation away from the joint line). A meta-analysis was performed of those studies reporting on surgical failures and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score. Eight studies met our inclusion criteria of Level I or II evidence. Results: Use of interference screws for femoral fixation resulted in a trend toward decreased risk of surgical failure (relative risk = 0.57; confidence interval, 0.1678-1.0918). When only Level I trials were evaluated, the same trend was noted toward a decreased risk of surgical failures using femoral interference screws (relative risk = 0.52; confidence interval, 0.1794-1.3122). There was no difference in postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score with Level I and II studies (relative risk = 0.9940; confidence interval, 0.6230-1.5860) or only Level I studies (relative risk = 1.0380; confidence interval, 0.6381-1.6886). Conclusions: The literature suggests a trend toward decreased surgical failures with femoral fixation at the joint line with an interference screw. However, there is no difference when postoperative functional outcomes are compared. Future studies are needed with standardized fixation methods and outcomes assessment to determine the importance of femoral fixation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955814096&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955814096&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11999-010-1662-4

DO - 10.1007/s11999-010-1662-4

M3 - Article

VL - 469

SP - 1075

EP - 1081

JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

SN - 0009-921X

IS - 4

ER -