"WHAT" and "WHERE" in auditory sensory processing

A high-density electrical mapping study of distinct neural processes underlying sound object recognition and sound localization

M. Victoria Leavitt, Sophie Molholm, Manuel Gomez-Ramirez, John J. Foxe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Functionally distinct dorsal and ventral auditory pathways for sound localization (WHERE) and sound object recognition (WHAT) have been describedinnon-human primates. A handful of studies have explored differential processing within these streams in humans, with highly inconsistent findings. Stimuli employed have included simple tones, noise bursts, and speech sounds, with simulated left-right spatial manipulations, and in some cases participants were not required to actively discriminate the stimuli. Our contention is that these paradigms were not well suited to dissociating processing within the two streams. Our aim here was to determine how early in processing we could find evidence for dissociable pathways using better titrated WHAT and WHERE task conditions. The use of more compelling tasks should allow us to amplify differential processing within the dorsal and ventral pathways. We employed high-density electrical mapping using a relatively large and environmentally realistic stimulus set (seven animal calls) delivered from seven free-field spatial locations; with stimulus configuration identical across the "WHERE" and "WHAT" tasks. Topographic analysis revealed distinct dorsal and ventral auditory processing networks during the WHERE and WHAT tasks with the earliest point of divergence seen during the N1 component of the auditory evoked response, beginning at approximately 100 ms. While this difference occurred during the N1 timeframe, it was not a simple modulation of N1 amplitude as it displayed a wholly different topographic distribution to that of the N1. Global dissimilarity measures using topographic modulation analysis confirmed that this difference between tasks was driven by a shift in the underlying generator configuration. Minimum-norm source reconstruction revealed distinct activations that corresponded well with activity within putative dorsal and ventral auditory structures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number23
JournalFrontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Sound Localization
Auditory Pathways
Auditory Evoked Potentials
Phonetics
Primates
Noise
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Auditory
  • Electrophysiology
  • Event-related potential

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sensory Systems
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{4a6d2745240d4465bfb25a03d9f186ea,
title = "{"}WHAT{"} and {"}WHERE{"} in auditory sensory processing: A high-density electrical mapping study of distinct neural processes underlying sound object recognition and sound localization",
abstract = "Functionally distinct dorsal and ventral auditory pathways for sound localization (WHERE) and sound object recognition (WHAT) have been describedinnon-human primates. A handful of studies have explored differential processing within these streams in humans, with highly inconsistent findings. Stimuli employed have included simple tones, noise bursts, and speech sounds, with simulated left-right spatial manipulations, and in some cases participants were not required to actively discriminate the stimuli. Our contention is that these paradigms were not well suited to dissociating processing within the two streams. Our aim here was to determine how early in processing we could find evidence for dissociable pathways using better titrated WHAT and WHERE task conditions. The use of more compelling tasks should allow us to amplify differential processing within the dorsal and ventral pathways. We employed high-density electrical mapping using a relatively large and environmentally realistic stimulus set (seven animal calls) delivered from seven free-field spatial locations; with stimulus configuration identical across the {"}WHERE{"} and {"}WHAT{"} tasks. Topographic analysis revealed distinct dorsal and ventral auditory processing networks during the WHERE and WHAT tasks with the earliest point of divergence seen during the N1 component of the auditory evoked response, beginning at approximately 100 ms. While this difference occurred during the N1 timeframe, it was not a simple modulation of N1 amplitude as it displayed a wholly different topographic distribution to that of the N1. Global dissimilarity measures using topographic modulation analysis confirmed that this difference between tasks was driven by a shift in the underlying generator configuration. Minimum-norm source reconstruction revealed distinct activations that corresponded well with activity within putative dorsal and ventral auditory structures.",
keywords = "Auditory, Electrophysiology, Event-related potential",
author = "Leavitt, {M. Victoria} and Sophie Molholm and Manuel Gomez-Ramirez and Foxe, {John J.}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.3389/fnint.2011.00023",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-5145",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "WHAT" and "WHERE" in auditory sensory processing

T2 - A high-density electrical mapping study of distinct neural processes underlying sound object recognition and sound localization

AU - Leavitt, M. Victoria

AU - Molholm, Sophie

AU - Gomez-Ramirez, Manuel

AU - Foxe, John J.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Functionally distinct dorsal and ventral auditory pathways for sound localization (WHERE) and sound object recognition (WHAT) have been describedinnon-human primates. A handful of studies have explored differential processing within these streams in humans, with highly inconsistent findings. Stimuli employed have included simple tones, noise bursts, and speech sounds, with simulated left-right spatial manipulations, and in some cases participants were not required to actively discriminate the stimuli. Our contention is that these paradigms were not well suited to dissociating processing within the two streams. Our aim here was to determine how early in processing we could find evidence for dissociable pathways using better titrated WHAT and WHERE task conditions. The use of more compelling tasks should allow us to amplify differential processing within the dorsal and ventral pathways. We employed high-density electrical mapping using a relatively large and environmentally realistic stimulus set (seven animal calls) delivered from seven free-field spatial locations; with stimulus configuration identical across the "WHERE" and "WHAT" tasks. Topographic analysis revealed distinct dorsal and ventral auditory processing networks during the WHERE and WHAT tasks with the earliest point of divergence seen during the N1 component of the auditory evoked response, beginning at approximately 100 ms. While this difference occurred during the N1 timeframe, it was not a simple modulation of N1 amplitude as it displayed a wholly different topographic distribution to that of the N1. Global dissimilarity measures using topographic modulation analysis confirmed that this difference between tasks was driven by a shift in the underlying generator configuration. Minimum-norm source reconstruction revealed distinct activations that corresponded well with activity within putative dorsal and ventral auditory structures.

AB - Functionally distinct dorsal and ventral auditory pathways for sound localization (WHERE) and sound object recognition (WHAT) have been describedinnon-human primates. A handful of studies have explored differential processing within these streams in humans, with highly inconsistent findings. Stimuli employed have included simple tones, noise bursts, and speech sounds, with simulated left-right spatial manipulations, and in some cases participants were not required to actively discriminate the stimuli. Our contention is that these paradigms were not well suited to dissociating processing within the two streams. Our aim here was to determine how early in processing we could find evidence for dissociable pathways using better titrated WHAT and WHERE task conditions. The use of more compelling tasks should allow us to amplify differential processing within the dorsal and ventral pathways. We employed high-density electrical mapping using a relatively large and environmentally realistic stimulus set (seven animal calls) delivered from seven free-field spatial locations; with stimulus configuration identical across the "WHERE" and "WHAT" tasks. Topographic analysis revealed distinct dorsal and ventral auditory processing networks during the WHERE and WHAT tasks with the earliest point of divergence seen during the N1 component of the auditory evoked response, beginning at approximately 100 ms. While this difference occurred during the N1 timeframe, it was not a simple modulation of N1 amplitude as it displayed a wholly different topographic distribution to that of the N1. Global dissimilarity measures using topographic modulation analysis confirmed that this difference between tasks was driven by a shift in the underlying generator configuration. Minimum-norm source reconstruction revealed distinct activations that corresponded well with activity within putative dorsal and ventral auditory structures.

KW - Auditory

KW - Electrophysiology

KW - Event-related potential

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=82355181671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=82355181671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnint.2011.00023

DO - 10.3389/fnint.2011.00023

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience

SN - 1662-5145

M1 - 23

ER -