Waist circumference-to-height ratio predicts adiposity better than body mass index in children and adolescents

P. Brambilla, G. Bedogni, Moonseong Heo, A. Pietrobelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

108 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Body mass index (BMI) is the surrogate measure of adiposity most commonly employed in children and adults. Waist circumference (WC) and the waist circumference-to-height ratio (WCHt) have been proposed as markers of adiposity-related morbidity in children. However, no study to date has compared WCHt, WC, BMI and skinfolds thickness for their ability to detect body adiposity.Aim:To compare WCHt, WC, BMI and skinfolds for their accuracy in predicting percent body fat (PBF), percent trunk fat (PTF) and fat mass index (FMI) in a large sample of children and adolescents.Design, setting and participants: We studied 2339 children and adolescents aged 8-18 years from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003/2004. Body fat was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Multivariable regression splines were used to model the association between PBF, PTF, FMI and the predictors of interest. Results: WCHt alone explained 64% of PBF variance as compared with 31% for WC, 32% for BMI and 72% for the sum of triceps and subscapular skinfolds (SF2) (P<0.001 for all). When age and gender were added to the predictors, the explained variance increased to 80% for the WCHt model, 72% for the WC model, 68% for the BMI model and 84% for the SF2 model. There was no practical advantage to add the ethnic group as further predictor. Similar relationships were observed with PTF and FMI. Conclusions: WCHt is better than WC and BMI at predicting adiposity in children and adolescents. It can be a useful surrogate of body adiposity when skinfold measurements are not available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)943-946
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of Obesity
Volume37
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Adiposity
Waist Circumference
Body Mass Index
Fats
Adipose Tissue
Skinfold Thickness
Nutrition Surveys
Photon Absorptiometry
Ethnic Groups
Morbidity

Keywords

  • Body composition
  • Body fat
  • Body mass index
  • Children
  • Trunk fat
  • Waist circumference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cite this

Waist circumference-to-height ratio predicts adiposity better than body mass index in children and adolescents. / Brambilla, P.; Bedogni, G.; Heo, Moonseong; Pietrobelli, A.

In: International Journal of Obesity, Vol. 37, No. 7, 07.2013, p. 943-946.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ec0b2ddfa7f7414583767cbf3394182e,
title = "Waist circumference-to-height ratio predicts adiposity better than body mass index in children and adolescents",
abstract = "Objective: Body mass index (BMI) is the surrogate measure of adiposity most commonly employed in children and adults. Waist circumference (WC) and the waist circumference-to-height ratio (WCHt) have been proposed as markers of adiposity-related morbidity in children. However, no study to date has compared WCHt, WC, BMI and skinfolds thickness for their ability to detect body adiposity.Aim:To compare WCHt, WC, BMI and skinfolds for their accuracy in predicting percent body fat (PBF), percent trunk fat (PTF) and fat mass index (FMI) in a large sample of children and adolescents.Design, setting and participants: We studied 2339 children and adolescents aged 8-18 years from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003/2004. Body fat was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Multivariable regression splines were used to model the association between PBF, PTF, FMI and the predictors of interest. Results: WCHt alone explained 64{\%} of PBF variance as compared with 31{\%} for WC, 32{\%} for BMI and 72{\%} for the sum of triceps and subscapular skinfolds (SF2) (P<0.001 for all). When age and gender were added to the predictors, the explained variance increased to 80{\%} for the WCHt model, 72{\%} for the WC model, 68{\%} for the BMI model and 84{\%} for the SF2 model. There was no practical advantage to add the ethnic group as further predictor. Similar relationships were observed with PTF and FMI. Conclusions: WCHt is better than WC and BMI at predicting adiposity in children and adolescents. It can be a useful surrogate of body adiposity when skinfold measurements are not available.",
keywords = "Body composition, Body fat, Body mass index, Children, Trunk fat, Waist circumference",
author = "P. Brambilla and G. Bedogni and Moonseong Heo and A. Pietrobelli",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1038/ijo.2013.32",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "943--946",
journal = "International Journal of Obesity",
issn = "0307-0565",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Waist circumference-to-height ratio predicts adiposity better than body mass index in children and adolescents

AU - Brambilla, P.

AU - Bedogni, G.

AU - Heo, Moonseong

AU - Pietrobelli, A.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - Objective: Body mass index (BMI) is the surrogate measure of adiposity most commonly employed in children and adults. Waist circumference (WC) and the waist circumference-to-height ratio (WCHt) have been proposed as markers of adiposity-related morbidity in children. However, no study to date has compared WCHt, WC, BMI and skinfolds thickness for their ability to detect body adiposity.Aim:To compare WCHt, WC, BMI and skinfolds for their accuracy in predicting percent body fat (PBF), percent trunk fat (PTF) and fat mass index (FMI) in a large sample of children and adolescents.Design, setting and participants: We studied 2339 children and adolescents aged 8-18 years from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003/2004. Body fat was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Multivariable regression splines were used to model the association between PBF, PTF, FMI and the predictors of interest. Results: WCHt alone explained 64% of PBF variance as compared with 31% for WC, 32% for BMI and 72% for the sum of triceps and subscapular skinfolds (SF2) (P<0.001 for all). When age and gender were added to the predictors, the explained variance increased to 80% for the WCHt model, 72% for the WC model, 68% for the BMI model and 84% for the SF2 model. There was no practical advantage to add the ethnic group as further predictor. Similar relationships were observed with PTF and FMI. Conclusions: WCHt is better than WC and BMI at predicting adiposity in children and adolescents. It can be a useful surrogate of body adiposity when skinfold measurements are not available.

AB - Objective: Body mass index (BMI) is the surrogate measure of adiposity most commonly employed in children and adults. Waist circumference (WC) and the waist circumference-to-height ratio (WCHt) have been proposed as markers of adiposity-related morbidity in children. However, no study to date has compared WCHt, WC, BMI and skinfolds thickness for their ability to detect body adiposity.Aim:To compare WCHt, WC, BMI and skinfolds for their accuracy in predicting percent body fat (PBF), percent trunk fat (PTF) and fat mass index (FMI) in a large sample of children and adolescents.Design, setting and participants: We studied 2339 children and adolescents aged 8-18 years from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003/2004. Body fat was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Multivariable regression splines were used to model the association between PBF, PTF, FMI and the predictors of interest. Results: WCHt alone explained 64% of PBF variance as compared with 31% for WC, 32% for BMI and 72% for the sum of triceps and subscapular skinfolds (SF2) (P<0.001 for all). When age and gender were added to the predictors, the explained variance increased to 80% for the WCHt model, 72% for the WC model, 68% for the BMI model and 84% for the SF2 model. There was no practical advantage to add the ethnic group as further predictor. Similar relationships were observed with PTF and FMI. Conclusions: WCHt is better than WC and BMI at predicting adiposity in children and adolescents. It can be a useful surrogate of body adiposity when skinfold measurements are not available.

KW - Body composition

KW - Body fat

KW - Body mass index

KW - Children

KW - Trunk fat

KW - Waist circumference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880320816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880320816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ijo.2013.32

DO - 10.1038/ijo.2013.32

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 943

EP - 946

JO - International Journal of Obesity

JF - International Journal of Obesity

SN - 0307-0565

IS - 7

ER -