Volumetric changes of the parotid gland during IMRT based on mid-treatment imaging: implications for parotid stem cell sparing strategies in head and neck cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the change in parotid glands at mid-treatment during IMRT and the association between radiation dose to the parotid gland stem cell (PGSC) region and patient-reported xerostomia for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Material and Methods: Patients who were treated from 2006–2012 at our institution with patient-reported xerostomia outcomes available at least 9 months following RT were included. PG and PGSC regions were delineated and the dose was estimated from the treatment plan dose distribution, using contours from pre- and mid-treatment CT scans. The association between radiation dose and volumetric changes was assessed using linear regression. Univariable logistic regression, logistic dose-response curves, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used to examine the relationship between radiation dose and patient-reported xerostomia. Results: Sixty-three patients were included, most treated with 70 Gy in 33 fractions; 34 patients had mid-treatment CT scans. Both contralateral and ipsilateral PGs had considerable volume reduction from baseline to mid-treatment (25% and 27%, respectively, both p <.001), significantly associated with mean PG dose (−0.44%/Gy, p =.008 and −0.54%/Gy, p <.001, respectively). There was a > 5 Gy difference in mean PG and PGSC dose for 8/34 patients at mid-treatment, with 6/8 (75%) reporting severe xerostomia. Xerostomia prediction based on whole PG or PGSC region dose showed similar performance (ROC AUC 0.754 and 0.749, respectively). The corresponding dose-response models also predicted similar risk of patient-reported xerostomia with mean dose to the contralateral PG (32.5%) or PGSC region (31.4%) at the 20 Gy QUANTEC-recommended sparing level. Conclusions: The radiation dose to the PGSC region did not show stronger association with patient-reported xerostomia compared to that of whole PG, possibly due to considerable anatomical changes identified at mid-treatment. This shift in the size and position of the PG warrants adaptive planning strategies to evaluate the true benefit of parotid stem cell sparing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalActa Oncologica
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2022

Keywords

  • head and neck cancer
  • IMRT
  • Parotid gland
  • parotid gland stem cell sparing
  • patient-reported xerostomia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Volumetric changes of the parotid gland during IMRT based on mid-treatment imaging: implications for parotid stem cell sparing strategies in head and neck cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this