TY - JOUR
T1 - Volitional control of single-electrode high gamma local field potentials by people with paralysis
AU - Milekovic, Tomislav
AU - Bacher, Daniel
AU - Sarma, Anish A.
AU - Simeral, John D.
AU - Saab, Jad
AU - Pandarinath, Chethan
AU - Yvert, Blaise
AU - Sorice, Brittany L.
AU - Blabe, Christine
AU - Oakley, Erin M.
AU - Tringale, Kathryn R.
AU - Eskandar, Emad
AU - Cash, Sydney S.
AU - Shenoy, Krishna V.
AU - Henderson, Jaimie M.
AU - Hochberg, Leigh R.
AU - Donoghue, John P.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank BrainGate2 clinical trial participants T2, T6, and T7 for their dedication to this research. The research was supported by the Morton Cure Paralysis Fund, Office of Research and Development, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs (B6453R, A6779I, B6459L), NIH: NICHD-NCMRR (N01HD10018), NIDCD (R01DC009899), Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, Stanford Institute for Neuro-Innovation and Translational Neuroscience, Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, MGH-Deane Institute, Katie Samson Foundation, Bio-X NeuroVentures, the Garlick Fund, the Reeve Fund, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, and the French-American Fulbright Commission.
Funding Information:
The research was supported by the Morton Cure Paralysis Fund, Office of Research and Development, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs (B6453R, A6779I, B6459L), NIH: NICHD-NCMRR (N01HD10018), NIDCD (R01DC009899), Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, Stanford Institute for Neuro-Innovation and Translational Neuroscience, Craig H. Neilsen Foundation, MGH-Deane Institute, Katie Samson Foundation, Bio-X NeuroVentures, the Garlick Fund, the Reeve Fund, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale, and the French-American Fulbright Commission.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 the American Physiological Society.
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can enable individuals to control effectors, such as a computer cursor, by directly decoding the user’s movement intentions from action potentials and local field potentials (LFPs) recorded within the motor cortex. However, the accuracy and complexity of effector control achieved with such “biomimetic” BCIs will depend on the degree to which the intended movements used to elicit control modulate the neural activity. In particular, channels that do not record distinguishable action potentials and only record LFP modulations may be of limited use for BCI control. In contrast, a biofeedback approach may surpass these limitations by letting the participants generate new control signals and learn strategies that improve the volitional control of signals used for effector control. Here, we show that, by using a biofeedback paradigm, three individuals with tetraplegia achieved volitional control of gamma LFPs (40-400 Hz) recorded by a single microelectrode implanted in the precentral gyrus. Control was improved over a pair of consecutive sessions up to 3 days apart. In all but one session, the channel used to achieve control lacked distinguishable action potentials. Our results indicate that biofeedback LFPbased BCIs may potentially contribute to the neural modulation necessary to obtain reliable and useful control of effectors. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study demonstrates that people with tetraplegia can volitionally control individual high-gamma local-field potential (LFP) channels recorded from the motor cortex, and that this control can be improved using biofeedback. Motor cortical LFP signals are thought to be both informative and stable intracortical signals and, thus, of importance for future brain-computer interfaces.
AB - Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can enable individuals to control effectors, such as a computer cursor, by directly decoding the user’s movement intentions from action potentials and local field potentials (LFPs) recorded within the motor cortex. However, the accuracy and complexity of effector control achieved with such “biomimetic” BCIs will depend on the degree to which the intended movements used to elicit control modulate the neural activity. In particular, channels that do not record distinguishable action potentials and only record LFP modulations may be of limited use for BCI control. In contrast, a biofeedback approach may surpass these limitations by letting the participants generate new control signals and learn strategies that improve the volitional control of signals used for effector control. Here, we show that, by using a biofeedback paradigm, three individuals with tetraplegia achieved volitional control of gamma LFPs (40-400 Hz) recorded by a single microelectrode implanted in the precentral gyrus. Control was improved over a pair of consecutive sessions up to 3 days apart. In all but one session, the channel used to achieve control lacked distinguishable action potentials. Our results indicate that biofeedback LFPbased BCIs may potentially contribute to the neural modulation necessary to obtain reliable and useful control of effectors. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our study demonstrates that people with tetraplegia can volitionally control individual high-gamma local-field potential (LFP) channels recorded from the motor cortex, and that this control can be improved using biofeedback. Motor cortical LFP signals are thought to be both informative and stable intracortical signals and, thus, of importance for future brain-computer interfaces.
KW - Biofeedback
KW - Brain-computer interface
KW - Local field potentials
KW - Motor cortex
KW - People with tetraplegia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064819464&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064819464&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/jn.00131.2018
DO - 10.1152/jn.00131.2018
M3 - Article
C2 - 30785814
AN - SCOPUS:85064819464
SN - 0022-3077
VL - 121
SP - 1428
EP - 1450
JO - Journal of Neurophysiology
JF - Journal of Neurophysiology
IS - 4
ER -