Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scintigraphy: a long journey to a renewed position of prominence in diagnosing pulmonary embolism

Raphaella da Silva, Muhammad Shah, Leonard M. Freeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scan has traveled a long, circuitous path since its introduction for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the 1960s. Its initial credibility was damaged following the publication of the PIOPED study in 1990 and the emergence of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in the mid-1990s. A considerable number of advances in both methodology and image interpretation have helped to restore the credibility of V/Q. There has also been considerable concern over the large radiation burden associated with CTPA. The issue of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of small PEs has also received a lot of attention. Although CTPA diagnoses more of these smaller PEs than V/Q, follow-up “outcomes” data show that they do not require treatment. The false-negative rates for both procedures are approximately 1 % and not significantly different from one another. Finally, a change from traditional probability interpretations to a simpler and similarly accurate trinary system has made V/Q scintigraphy interpretations easier to understand for the referring clinician.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)369-378
Number of pages10
JournalClinical and Translational Imaging
Volume2
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 25 2014

Fingerprint

Pulmonary Embolism
Radionuclide Imaging
Ventilation
Perfusion
Lung
Angiography
Publications
Radiation
Medical Overuse

Keywords

  • Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA)
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scintigraphy : a long journey to a renewed position of prominence in diagnosing pulmonary embolism. / da Silva, Raphaella; Shah, Muhammad; Freeman, Leonard M.

In: Clinical and Translational Imaging, Vol. 2, No. 5, 25.10.2014, p. 369-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c18509fff93748fca648a942987ed09e,
title = "Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scintigraphy: a long journey to a renewed position of prominence in diagnosing pulmonary embolism",
abstract = "The ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scan has traveled a long, circuitous path since its introduction for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the 1960s. Its initial credibility was damaged following the publication of the PIOPED study in 1990 and the emergence of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in the mid-1990s. A considerable number of advances in both methodology and image interpretation have helped to restore the credibility of V/Q. There has also been considerable concern over the large radiation burden associated with CTPA. The issue of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of small PEs has also received a lot of attention. Although CTPA diagnoses more of these smaller PEs than V/Q, follow-up “outcomes” data show that they do not require treatment. The false-negative rates for both procedures are approximately 1 {\%} and not significantly different from one another. Finally, a change from traditional probability interpretations to a simpler and similarly accurate trinary system has made V/Q scintigraphy interpretations easier to understand for the referring clinician.",
keywords = "Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA), Pulmonary embolism, Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy",
author = "{da Silva}, Raphaella and Muhammad Shah and Freeman, {Leonard M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1007/s40336-014-0077-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "369--378",
journal = "Clinical and Translational Imaging",
issn = "2281-5872",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scintigraphy

T2 - a long journey to a renewed position of prominence in diagnosing pulmonary embolism

AU - da Silva, Raphaella

AU - Shah, Muhammad

AU - Freeman, Leonard M.

PY - 2014/10/25

Y1 - 2014/10/25

N2 - The ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scan has traveled a long, circuitous path since its introduction for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the 1960s. Its initial credibility was damaged following the publication of the PIOPED study in 1990 and the emergence of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in the mid-1990s. A considerable number of advances in both methodology and image interpretation have helped to restore the credibility of V/Q. There has also been considerable concern over the large radiation burden associated with CTPA. The issue of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of small PEs has also received a lot of attention. Although CTPA diagnoses more of these smaller PEs than V/Q, follow-up “outcomes” data show that they do not require treatment. The false-negative rates for both procedures are approximately 1 % and not significantly different from one another. Finally, a change from traditional probability interpretations to a simpler and similarly accurate trinary system has made V/Q scintigraphy interpretations easier to understand for the referring clinician.

AB - The ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scan has traveled a long, circuitous path since its introduction for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the 1960s. Its initial credibility was damaged following the publication of the PIOPED study in 1990 and the emergence of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in the mid-1990s. A considerable number of advances in both methodology and image interpretation have helped to restore the credibility of V/Q. There has also been considerable concern over the large radiation burden associated with CTPA. The issue of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of small PEs has also received a lot of attention. Although CTPA diagnoses more of these smaller PEs than V/Q, follow-up “outcomes” data show that they do not require treatment. The false-negative rates for both procedures are approximately 1 % and not significantly different from one another. Finally, a change from traditional probability interpretations to a simpler and similarly accurate trinary system has made V/Q scintigraphy interpretations easier to understand for the referring clinician.

KW - Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA)

KW - Pulmonary embolism

KW - Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scintigraphy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952991426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952991426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s40336-014-0077-8

DO - 10.1007/s40336-014-0077-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84952991426

VL - 2

SP - 369

EP - 378

JO - Clinical and Translational Imaging

JF - Clinical and Translational Imaging

SN - 2281-5872

IS - 5

ER -