Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after head and spinal trauma: Intermittent pneumatic compression devices versus low molecular weight heparin

Mehmet Kurtoglu, Hakan Yanar, Yilmaz Bilsel, Recep Guloglu, Sevda Kizilirmak, Dincay Buyukkurt, Volkan Granit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

104 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although there are alternative methods and drugs for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE), it is not clear which modality is most suitable and efficacious for patients with severe (stable or unstable) head/spinal injures. The aim of this study was to compare intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPC) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for preventing VTE. We prospectively randomized 120 head/spinal traumatized patients for comparison of IPC with LMWH as a prophylaxis modality against VTE. Venous duplex color-flow Doppler sonography of the lower extremities was performed each week of hospitalization and 1 week after discharge. When there was a suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE), patients were evaluated with spiral computed tomography. Patients were analyzed for demographic features, injury severity scores, associated injuries, type of head/spinal trauma, complications, transfusion, and incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and PE. Two patients (3.33%) from the IPC group and 4 patients (6.66%) from the LMWH group died, with their deaths due to PE. Nine other patients also succumbed, unrelated to PE. DVT developed in 4 patients (6.66%) in the IPC group and in 3 patients (5%) in the LMWH group. There was no statistically significant difference regarding a reduction in DVT, PE, or mortality between groups (p = 0.04, p > 0.05, p > 0.05, respectively). IPC can be used safely for prophylaxis of VTE in head/spinal trauma patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)807-811
Number of pages5
JournalWorld Journal of Surgery
Volume28
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices
Low Molecular Weight Heparin
Venous Thromboembolism
Craniocerebral Trauma
Pulmonary Embolism
Venous Thrombosis
Doppler Duplex Ultrasonography
Head
Doppler Color Ultrasonography
Spinal Injuries
Injury Severity Score
Spiral Computed Tomography
Lower Extremity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after head and spinal trauma : Intermittent pneumatic compression devices versus low molecular weight heparin. / Kurtoglu, Mehmet; Yanar, Hakan; Bilsel, Yilmaz; Guloglu, Recep; Kizilirmak, Sevda; Buyukkurt, Dincay; Granit, Volkan.

In: World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 28, No. 8, 08.2004, p. 807-811.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kurtoglu, Mehmet ; Yanar, Hakan ; Bilsel, Yilmaz ; Guloglu, Recep ; Kizilirmak, Sevda ; Buyukkurt, Dincay ; Granit, Volkan. / Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after head and spinal trauma : Intermittent pneumatic compression devices versus low molecular weight heparin. In: World Journal of Surgery. 2004 ; Vol. 28, No. 8. pp. 807-811.
@article{71b37ef45c82497b8fa2b2bf74e07f27,
title = "Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after head and spinal trauma: Intermittent pneumatic compression devices versus low molecular weight heparin",
abstract = "Although there are alternative methods and drugs for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE), it is not clear which modality is most suitable and efficacious for patients with severe (stable or unstable) head/spinal injures. The aim of this study was to compare intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPC) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for preventing VTE. We prospectively randomized 120 head/spinal traumatized patients for comparison of IPC with LMWH as a prophylaxis modality against VTE. Venous duplex color-flow Doppler sonography of the lower extremities was performed each week of hospitalization and 1 week after discharge. When there was a suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE), patients were evaluated with spiral computed tomography. Patients were analyzed for demographic features, injury severity scores, associated injuries, type of head/spinal trauma, complications, transfusion, and incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and PE. Two patients (3.33{\%}) from the IPC group and 4 patients (6.66{\%}) from the LMWH group died, with their deaths due to PE. Nine other patients also succumbed, unrelated to PE. DVT developed in 4 patients (6.66{\%}) in the IPC group and in 3 patients (5{\%}) in the LMWH group. There was no statistically significant difference regarding a reduction in DVT, PE, or mortality between groups (p = 0.04, p > 0.05, p > 0.05, respectively). IPC can be used safely for prophylaxis of VTE in head/spinal trauma patients.",
author = "Mehmet Kurtoglu and Hakan Yanar and Yilmaz Bilsel and Recep Guloglu and Sevda Kizilirmak and Dincay Buyukkurt and Volkan Granit",
year = "2004",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s00268-004-7295-6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "807--811",
journal = "World Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after head and spinal trauma

T2 - Intermittent pneumatic compression devices versus low molecular weight heparin

AU - Kurtoglu, Mehmet

AU - Yanar, Hakan

AU - Bilsel, Yilmaz

AU - Guloglu, Recep

AU - Kizilirmak, Sevda

AU - Buyukkurt, Dincay

AU - Granit, Volkan

PY - 2004/8

Y1 - 2004/8

N2 - Although there are alternative methods and drugs for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE), it is not clear which modality is most suitable and efficacious for patients with severe (stable or unstable) head/spinal injures. The aim of this study was to compare intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPC) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for preventing VTE. We prospectively randomized 120 head/spinal traumatized patients for comparison of IPC with LMWH as a prophylaxis modality against VTE. Venous duplex color-flow Doppler sonography of the lower extremities was performed each week of hospitalization and 1 week after discharge. When there was a suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE), patients were evaluated with spiral computed tomography. Patients were analyzed for demographic features, injury severity scores, associated injuries, type of head/spinal trauma, complications, transfusion, and incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and PE. Two patients (3.33%) from the IPC group and 4 patients (6.66%) from the LMWH group died, with their deaths due to PE. Nine other patients also succumbed, unrelated to PE. DVT developed in 4 patients (6.66%) in the IPC group and in 3 patients (5%) in the LMWH group. There was no statistically significant difference regarding a reduction in DVT, PE, or mortality between groups (p = 0.04, p > 0.05, p > 0.05, respectively). IPC can be used safely for prophylaxis of VTE in head/spinal trauma patients.

AB - Although there are alternative methods and drugs for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE), it is not clear which modality is most suitable and efficacious for patients with severe (stable or unstable) head/spinal injures. The aim of this study was to compare intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPC) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for preventing VTE. We prospectively randomized 120 head/spinal traumatized patients for comparison of IPC with LMWH as a prophylaxis modality against VTE. Venous duplex color-flow Doppler sonography of the lower extremities was performed each week of hospitalization and 1 week after discharge. When there was a suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE), patients were evaluated with spiral computed tomography. Patients were analyzed for demographic features, injury severity scores, associated injuries, type of head/spinal trauma, complications, transfusion, and incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and PE. Two patients (3.33%) from the IPC group and 4 patients (6.66%) from the LMWH group died, with their deaths due to PE. Nine other patients also succumbed, unrelated to PE. DVT developed in 4 patients (6.66%) in the IPC group and in 3 patients (5%) in the LMWH group. There was no statistically significant difference regarding a reduction in DVT, PE, or mortality between groups (p = 0.04, p > 0.05, p > 0.05, respectively). IPC can be used safely for prophylaxis of VTE in head/spinal trauma patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4744368749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4744368749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-004-7295-6

DO - 10.1007/s00268-004-7295-6

M3 - Article

C2 - 15457363

AN - SCOPUS:4744368749

VL - 28

SP - 807

EP - 811

JO - World Journal of Surgery

JF - World Journal of Surgery

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 8

ER -