Validity and responsiveness of generic preference-based HRQOL instruments in chronic epilepsy

J. T. Langfitt, B. G. Vickrey, M. P. McDermott, S. Messing, A. T. Berg, S. S. Spencer, M. R. Sperling, C. W. Bazil, Shlomo Shinnar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Generic, preference-based instruments are recommended for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cost-utility analyses (CUA). We aimed to determine which instrument is the most appropriate for CUA of epilepsy care, using established psychometric criteria. We compared validity and responsiveness of EQ5D (using both UK and US preferences), visual analog scale (VAS), Health Utilities Index Mark II (HUI-2) and Mark III (HUI-3) and SF6D in 165 adults evaluated for epilepsy surgery. SF6D had the strongest or next-strongest associations with seizure severity and seizure control. It was not associated with education or IQ. Only SF6D and HUI-3 discriminated between patients with and without seizures 2 years after baseline evaluation. SF6D was most or next-most responsive to being seizure-free for 2 years, in most responsiveness analyses. VAS was also responsive, but showed less evidence of validity. The QOLIE-89, an epilepsy-targeted profile instrument, had stronger evidence for validity and responsiveness than the preference instruments. SF6D has several key psychometric advantages over four other preference instruments in CUAs of epilepsy care. This may reflect better coverage of HRQOL dimensions affected by epilepsy, greater sensitivity at the upper end of the HRQOL continuum, or both. These findings may not generalize to other chronic conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)899-914
Number of pages16
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

Epilepsy
Quality of Life
Seizures
Visual Analog Scale
Psychometrics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Education
Health

Keywords

  • Epilepsy
  • Preference
  • Responsiveness
  • Utility
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Langfitt, J. T., Vickrey, B. G., McDermott, M. P., Messing, S., Berg, A. T., Spencer, S. S., ... Shinnar, S. (2006). Validity and responsiveness of generic preference-based HRQOL instruments in chronic epilepsy. Quality of Life Research, 15(5), 899-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-5231-3

Validity and responsiveness of generic preference-based HRQOL instruments in chronic epilepsy. / Langfitt, J. T.; Vickrey, B. G.; McDermott, M. P.; Messing, S.; Berg, A. T.; Spencer, S. S.; Sperling, M. R.; Bazil, C. W.; Shinnar, Shlomo.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 15, No. 5, 05.2006, p. 899-914.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Langfitt, JT, Vickrey, BG, McDermott, MP, Messing, S, Berg, AT, Spencer, SS, Sperling, MR, Bazil, CW & Shinnar, S 2006, 'Validity and responsiveness of generic preference-based HRQOL instruments in chronic epilepsy', Quality of Life Research, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 899-914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-5231-3
Langfitt, J. T. ; Vickrey, B. G. ; McDermott, M. P. ; Messing, S. ; Berg, A. T. ; Spencer, S. S. ; Sperling, M. R. ; Bazil, C. W. ; Shinnar, Shlomo. / Validity and responsiveness of generic preference-based HRQOL instruments in chronic epilepsy. In: Quality of Life Research. 2006 ; Vol. 15, No. 5. pp. 899-914.
@article{8af90a55472c42e6b725bdd28ce49ad8,
title = "Validity and responsiveness of generic preference-based HRQOL instruments in chronic epilepsy",
abstract = "Generic, preference-based instruments are recommended for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cost-utility analyses (CUA). We aimed to determine which instrument is the most appropriate for CUA of epilepsy care, using established psychometric criteria. We compared validity and responsiveness of EQ5D (using both UK and US preferences), visual analog scale (VAS), Health Utilities Index Mark II (HUI-2) and Mark III (HUI-3) and SF6D in 165 adults evaluated for epilepsy surgery. SF6D had the strongest or next-strongest associations with seizure severity and seizure control. It was not associated with education or IQ. Only SF6D and HUI-3 discriminated between patients with and without seizures 2 years after baseline evaluation. SF6D was most or next-most responsive to being seizure-free for 2 years, in most responsiveness analyses. VAS was also responsive, but showed less evidence of validity. The QOLIE-89, an epilepsy-targeted profile instrument, had stronger evidence for validity and responsiveness than the preference instruments. SF6D has several key psychometric advantages over four other preference instruments in CUAs of epilepsy care. This may reflect better coverage of HRQOL dimensions affected by epilepsy, greater sensitivity at the upper end of the HRQOL continuum, or both. These findings may not generalize to other chronic conditions.",
keywords = "Epilepsy, Preference, Responsiveness, Utility, Validity",
author = "Langfitt, {J. T.} and Vickrey, {B. G.} and McDermott, {M. P.} and S. Messing and Berg, {A. T.} and Spencer, {S. S.} and Sperling, {M. R.} and Bazil, {C. W.} and Shlomo Shinnar",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1007/s11136-005-5231-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "899--914",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validity and responsiveness of generic preference-based HRQOL instruments in chronic epilepsy

AU - Langfitt, J. T.

AU - Vickrey, B. G.

AU - McDermott, M. P.

AU - Messing, S.

AU - Berg, A. T.

AU - Spencer, S. S.

AU - Sperling, M. R.

AU - Bazil, C. W.

AU - Shinnar, Shlomo

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Generic, preference-based instruments are recommended for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cost-utility analyses (CUA). We aimed to determine which instrument is the most appropriate for CUA of epilepsy care, using established psychometric criteria. We compared validity and responsiveness of EQ5D (using both UK and US preferences), visual analog scale (VAS), Health Utilities Index Mark II (HUI-2) and Mark III (HUI-3) and SF6D in 165 adults evaluated for epilepsy surgery. SF6D had the strongest or next-strongest associations with seizure severity and seizure control. It was not associated with education or IQ. Only SF6D and HUI-3 discriminated between patients with and without seizures 2 years after baseline evaluation. SF6D was most or next-most responsive to being seizure-free for 2 years, in most responsiveness analyses. VAS was also responsive, but showed less evidence of validity. The QOLIE-89, an epilepsy-targeted profile instrument, had stronger evidence for validity and responsiveness than the preference instruments. SF6D has several key psychometric advantages over four other preference instruments in CUAs of epilepsy care. This may reflect better coverage of HRQOL dimensions affected by epilepsy, greater sensitivity at the upper end of the HRQOL continuum, or both. These findings may not generalize to other chronic conditions.

AB - Generic, preference-based instruments are recommended for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cost-utility analyses (CUA). We aimed to determine which instrument is the most appropriate for CUA of epilepsy care, using established psychometric criteria. We compared validity and responsiveness of EQ5D (using both UK and US preferences), visual analog scale (VAS), Health Utilities Index Mark II (HUI-2) and Mark III (HUI-3) and SF6D in 165 adults evaluated for epilepsy surgery. SF6D had the strongest or next-strongest associations with seizure severity and seizure control. It was not associated with education or IQ. Only SF6D and HUI-3 discriminated between patients with and without seizures 2 years after baseline evaluation. SF6D was most or next-most responsive to being seizure-free for 2 years, in most responsiveness analyses. VAS was also responsive, but showed less evidence of validity. The QOLIE-89, an epilepsy-targeted profile instrument, had stronger evidence for validity and responsiveness than the preference instruments. SF6D has several key psychometric advantages over four other preference instruments in CUAs of epilepsy care. This may reflect better coverage of HRQOL dimensions affected by epilepsy, greater sensitivity at the upper end of the HRQOL continuum, or both. These findings may not generalize to other chronic conditions.

KW - Epilepsy

KW - Preference

KW - Responsiveness

KW - Utility

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33744461818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33744461818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-005-5231-3

DO - 10.1007/s11136-005-5231-3

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 899

EP - 914

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 5

ER -