Usefulness of intracardiac echocardiography for the diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis

Maria Lucia Narducci, Gemma Pelargonio, Eleonora Russo, Leonardo Marinaccio, Antonio Di Monaco, Francesco Perna, Gianluigi Bencardino, Michela Casella, Luigi Di Biase, Pasquale Santangeli, Rosalinda Palmieri, Christian Lauria, Ghaliah Al Mohani, Francesca Di Clemente, Claudio Tondo, Faustino Pennestri, Carolina Ierardi, Antonio G. Rebuzzi, Filippo Crea, Fulvio Bellocci & 2 others Andrea Natale, Antonio Dello Russo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The goal of this study was to compare transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for the diagnosis of cardiac device-related endocarditis (CDI). Background: The diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) was established by using the modified Duke criteria based mainly on echocardiography and blood culture results. No previous studies have compared ICE with TEE for the diagnosis of IE. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 162 patients (age 72 ± 11 years; 125 male) who underwent transvenous lead extraction: 152 with CDI and 10 with lead malfunction (control group). Using the modified Duke criteria, we divided the patients with infection into 3 groups: 44 with a "definite" diagnosis of IE (group 1), 52 with a "possible" diagnosis of IE (group 2), and 56 with a "rejected" diagnosis of IE (group 3). TEE and ICE were performed before the procedure. Results: In group 1, ICE identified intracardiac masses (ICM) in all 44 patients; TEE identified ICM in 32 patients (73%). In group 2, 6 patients (11%) had ICE and TEE both positive for ICM, 8 patients (15%) had a negative TEE but a positive ICE, and 38 patients (73%) had ICE and TEE both negative. In group 3, 2 patients (3%) had ICM both at ICE and TEE, 1 patient (2%) had an ICM at ICE and a negative TEE, and 53 patients (95%) had no ICM at ICE and TEE. ICE and TEE were both negative in the control group. Conclusions: ICE represents a useful technique for the diagnosis of ICM, thus providing improved imaging of right-sided leads and increasing the diagnostic yield compared with TEE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1398-1405
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume61
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Transesophageal Echocardiography
Endocarditis
Echocardiography
Equipment and Supplies
Control Groups

Keywords

  • infective endocarditis
  • intracardiac echocardiography
  • transesophageal echocardiography
  • transvenous lead extraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Usefulness of intracardiac echocardiography for the diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis. / Narducci, Maria Lucia; Pelargonio, Gemma; Russo, Eleonora; Marinaccio, Leonardo; Di Monaco, Antonio; Perna, Francesco; Bencardino, Gianluigi; Casella, Michela; Di Biase, Luigi; Santangeli, Pasquale; Palmieri, Rosalinda; Lauria, Christian; Al Mohani, Ghaliah; Di Clemente, Francesca; Tondo, Claudio; Pennestri, Faustino; Ierardi, Carolina; Rebuzzi, Antonio G.; Crea, Filippo; Bellocci, Fulvio; Natale, Andrea; Russo, Antonio Dello.

In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Vol. 61, No. 13, 02.04.2013, p. 1398-1405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Narducci, ML, Pelargonio, G, Russo, E, Marinaccio, L, Di Monaco, A, Perna, F, Bencardino, G, Casella, M, Di Biase, L, Santangeli, P, Palmieri, R, Lauria, C, Al Mohani, G, Di Clemente, F, Tondo, C, Pennestri, F, Ierardi, C, Rebuzzi, AG, Crea, F, Bellocci, F, Natale, A & Russo, AD 2013, 'Usefulness of intracardiac echocardiography for the diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis', Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 61, no. 13, pp. 1398-1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.041
Narducci, Maria Lucia ; Pelargonio, Gemma ; Russo, Eleonora ; Marinaccio, Leonardo ; Di Monaco, Antonio ; Perna, Francesco ; Bencardino, Gianluigi ; Casella, Michela ; Di Biase, Luigi ; Santangeli, Pasquale ; Palmieri, Rosalinda ; Lauria, Christian ; Al Mohani, Ghaliah ; Di Clemente, Francesca ; Tondo, Claudio ; Pennestri, Faustino ; Ierardi, Carolina ; Rebuzzi, Antonio G. ; Crea, Filippo ; Bellocci, Fulvio ; Natale, Andrea ; Russo, Antonio Dello. / Usefulness of intracardiac echocardiography for the diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis. In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2013 ; Vol. 61, No. 13. pp. 1398-1405.
@article{c977f945290b421ab530fe8f1b8f0bd7,
title = "Usefulness of intracardiac echocardiography for the diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis",
abstract = "Objectives: The goal of this study was to compare transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for the diagnosis of cardiac device-related endocarditis (CDI). Background: The diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) was established by using the modified Duke criteria based mainly on echocardiography and blood culture results. No previous studies have compared ICE with TEE for the diagnosis of IE. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 162 patients (age 72 ± 11 years; 125 male) who underwent transvenous lead extraction: 152 with CDI and 10 with lead malfunction (control group). Using the modified Duke criteria, we divided the patients with infection into 3 groups: 44 with a {"}definite{"} diagnosis of IE (group 1), 52 with a {"}possible{"} diagnosis of IE (group 2), and 56 with a {"}rejected{"} diagnosis of IE (group 3). TEE and ICE were performed before the procedure. Results: In group 1, ICE identified intracardiac masses (ICM) in all 44 patients; TEE identified ICM in 32 patients (73{\%}). In group 2, 6 patients (11{\%}) had ICE and TEE both positive for ICM, 8 patients (15{\%}) had a negative TEE but a positive ICE, and 38 patients (73{\%}) had ICE and TEE both negative. In group 3, 2 patients (3{\%}) had ICM both at ICE and TEE, 1 patient (2{\%}) had an ICM at ICE and a negative TEE, and 53 patients (95{\%}) had no ICM at ICE and TEE. ICE and TEE were both negative in the control group. Conclusions: ICE represents a useful technique for the diagnosis of ICM, thus providing improved imaging of right-sided leads and increasing the diagnostic yield compared with TEE.",
keywords = "infective endocarditis, intracardiac echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, transvenous lead extraction",
author = "Narducci, {Maria Lucia} and Gemma Pelargonio and Eleonora Russo and Leonardo Marinaccio and {Di Monaco}, Antonio and Francesco Perna and Gianluigi Bencardino and Michela Casella and {Di Biase}, Luigi and Pasquale Santangeli and Rosalinda Palmieri and Christian Lauria and {Al Mohani}, Ghaliah and {Di Clemente}, Francesca and Claudio Tondo and Faustino Pennestri and Carolina Ierardi and Rebuzzi, {Antonio G.} and Filippo Crea and Fulvio Bellocci and Andrea Natale and Russo, {Antonio Dello}",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "1398--1405",
journal = "Journal of the American College of Cardiology",
issn = "0735-1097",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Usefulness of intracardiac echocardiography for the diagnosis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related endocarditis

AU - Narducci, Maria Lucia

AU - Pelargonio, Gemma

AU - Russo, Eleonora

AU - Marinaccio, Leonardo

AU - Di Monaco, Antonio

AU - Perna, Francesco

AU - Bencardino, Gianluigi

AU - Casella, Michela

AU - Di Biase, Luigi

AU - Santangeli, Pasquale

AU - Palmieri, Rosalinda

AU - Lauria, Christian

AU - Al Mohani, Ghaliah

AU - Di Clemente, Francesca

AU - Tondo, Claudio

AU - Pennestri, Faustino

AU - Ierardi, Carolina

AU - Rebuzzi, Antonio G.

AU - Crea, Filippo

AU - Bellocci, Fulvio

AU - Natale, Andrea

AU - Russo, Antonio Dello

PY - 2013/4/2

Y1 - 2013/4/2

N2 - Objectives: The goal of this study was to compare transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for the diagnosis of cardiac device-related endocarditis (CDI). Background: The diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) was established by using the modified Duke criteria based mainly on echocardiography and blood culture results. No previous studies have compared ICE with TEE for the diagnosis of IE. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 162 patients (age 72 ± 11 years; 125 male) who underwent transvenous lead extraction: 152 with CDI and 10 with lead malfunction (control group). Using the modified Duke criteria, we divided the patients with infection into 3 groups: 44 with a "definite" diagnosis of IE (group 1), 52 with a "possible" diagnosis of IE (group 2), and 56 with a "rejected" diagnosis of IE (group 3). TEE and ICE were performed before the procedure. Results: In group 1, ICE identified intracardiac masses (ICM) in all 44 patients; TEE identified ICM in 32 patients (73%). In group 2, 6 patients (11%) had ICE and TEE both positive for ICM, 8 patients (15%) had a negative TEE but a positive ICE, and 38 patients (73%) had ICE and TEE both negative. In group 3, 2 patients (3%) had ICM both at ICE and TEE, 1 patient (2%) had an ICM at ICE and a negative TEE, and 53 patients (95%) had no ICM at ICE and TEE. ICE and TEE were both negative in the control group. Conclusions: ICE represents a useful technique for the diagnosis of ICM, thus providing improved imaging of right-sided leads and increasing the diagnostic yield compared with TEE.

AB - Objectives: The goal of this study was to compare transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for the diagnosis of cardiac device-related endocarditis (CDI). Background: The diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) was established by using the modified Duke criteria based mainly on echocardiography and blood culture results. No previous studies have compared ICE with TEE for the diagnosis of IE. Methods: We prospectively enrolled 162 patients (age 72 ± 11 years; 125 male) who underwent transvenous lead extraction: 152 with CDI and 10 with lead malfunction (control group). Using the modified Duke criteria, we divided the patients with infection into 3 groups: 44 with a "definite" diagnosis of IE (group 1), 52 with a "possible" diagnosis of IE (group 2), and 56 with a "rejected" diagnosis of IE (group 3). TEE and ICE were performed before the procedure. Results: In group 1, ICE identified intracardiac masses (ICM) in all 44 patients; TEE identified ICM in 32 patients (73%). In group 2, 6 patients (11%) had ICE and TEE both positive for ICM, 8 patients (15%) had a negative TEE but a positive ICE, and 38 patients (73%) had ICE and TEE both negative. In group 3, 2 patients (3%) had ICM both at ICE and TEE, 1 patient (2%) had an ICM at ICE and a negative TEE, and 53 patients (95%) had no ICM at ICE and TEE. ICE and TEE were both negative in the control group. Conclusions: ICE represents a useful technique for the diagnosis of ICM, thus providing improved imaging of right-sided leads and increasing the diagnostic yield compared with TEE.

KW - infective endocarditis

KW - intracardiac echocardiography

KW - transesophageal echocardiography

KW - transvenous lead extraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875469382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875469382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.041

DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.041

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 1398

EP - 1405

JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology

SN - 0735-1097

IS - 13

ER -