Usefulness of carotid sinus pressure in detecting thesick sinus syndrome

Lawrence Gould, C. V Ramana Reddy, William H. Becker, Keun Chang OH, Soo G. Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Electrophysiological studies are often normal in the sick sinus syndrome (SSS). His bundle electrograms (HBE), with right atrial pacing and sinus node recovery times (SNRT) were obtained in 30 patients with the SSS and in 20 patients without the SSS. Carotid sinus pressure was also applied to all patients during the HBE studies. Corrected SNRT, which is the observed SNRT minus the unpaced cycle length, was calculated as well as the corrected carotid sinus recovery time, which is the observed carotid sinus recovery time (SSRT) minus the unpaced cycle length. In the 30 patients with the SSS, the SNRT was greater than 1680 msec in five patients, with a sensitivity of 17%. The CSRT was greater than 2000 msec in 16 patients, with a sensivity of 53%. The corrected SNRT was greater than 450 msec in eight patients, with a sensitivity of 27%. The corrected CSRT was greater than 450 msec in 22 patients, with a sensitivity of 73%. Thus, the corrected CSRT is a major provocative test for the SSS. In the 20 patients without the SSS, the SNRT and CSRT were normal in every patient, with a specificity of 100%. The corrected SNRT was less than 450 msec in 19 of 20 patients. The average SNRT was 997 msec, while the average CSRT was 1054 msec (r=0.71, p<0.001). Therefore, the carotid sinus recovery time is a non-invasive estimate of the sinus node recovery time in patients without the SSS.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)261-268
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Electrocardiology
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1978
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Carotid Sinus
Sinoatrial Node
Sick Sinus Syndrome
Pressure
Cardiac Electrophysiologic Techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Usefulness of carotid sinus pressure in detecting thesick sinus syndrome. / Gould, Lawrence; Reddy, C. V Ramana; Becker, William H.; OH, Keun Chang; Kim, Soo G.

In: Journal of Electrocardiology, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1978, p. 261-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gould, Lawrence ; Reddy, C. V Ramana ; Becker, William H. ; OH, Keun Chang ; Kim, Soo G. / Usefulness of carotid sinus pressure in detecting thesick sinus syndrome. In: Journal of Electrocardiology. 1978 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 261-268.
@article{1c4d2ae1dffb433793cbeaf40c347387,
title = "Usefulness of carotid sinus pressure in detecting thesick sinus syndrome",
abstract = "Electrophysiological studies are often normal in the sick sinus syndrome (SSS). His bundle electrograms (HBE), with right atrial pacing and sinus node recovery times (SNRT) were obtained in 30 patients with the SSS and in 20 patients without the SSS. Carotid sinus pressure was also applied to all patients during the HBE studies. Corrected SNRT, which is the observed SNRT minus the unpaced cycle length, was calculated as well as the corrected carotid sinus recovery time, which is the observed carotid sinus recovery time (SSRT) minus the unpaced cycle length. In the 30 patients with the SSS, the SNRT was greater than 1680 msec in five patients, with a sensitivity of 17{\%}. The CSRT was greater than 2000 msec in 16 patients, with a sensivity of 53{\%}. The corrected SNRT was greater than 450 msec in eight patients, with a sensitivity of 27{\%}. The corrected CSRT was greater than 450 msec in 22 patients, with a sensitivity of 73{\%}. Thus, the corrected CSRT is a major provocative test for the SSS. In the 20 patients without the SSS, the SNRT and CSRT were normal in every patient, with a specificity of 100{\%}. The corrected SNRT was less than 450 msec in 19 of 20 patients. The average SNRT was 997 msec, while the average CSRT was 1054 msec (r=0.71, p<0.001). Therefore, the carotid sinus recovery time is a non-invasive estimate of the sinus node recovery time in patients without the SSS.",
author = "Lawrence Gould and Reddy, {C. V Ramana} and Becker, {William H.} and OH, {Keun Chang} and Kim, {Soo G.}",
year = "1978",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-0736(78)80126-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "261--268",
journal = "Journal of Electrocardiology",
issn = "0022-0736",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Usefulness of carotid sinus pressure in detecting thesick sinus syndrome

AU - Gould, Lawrence

AU - Reddy, C. V Ramana

AU - Becker, William H.

AU - OH, Keun Chang

AU - Kim, Soo G.

PY - 1978

Y1 - 1978

N2 - Electrophysiological studies are often normal in the sick sinus syndrome (SSS). His bundle electrograms (HBE), with right atrial pacing and sinus node recovery times (SNRT) were obtained in 30 patients with the SSS and in 20 patients without the SSS. Carotid sinus pressure was also applied to all patients during the HBE studies. Corrected SNRT, which is the observed SNRT minus the unpaced cycle length, was calculated as well as the corrected carotid sinus recovery time, which is the observed carotid sinus recovery time (SSRT) minus the unpaced cycle length. In the 30 patients with the SSS, the SNRT was greater than 1680 msec in five patients, with a sensitivity of 17%. The CSRT was greater than 2000 msec in 16 patients, with a sensivity of 53%. The corrected SNRT was greater than 450 msec in eight patients, with a sensitivity of 27%. The corrected CSRT was greater than 450 msec in 22 patients, with a sensitivity of 73%. Thus, the corrected CSRT is a major provocative test for the SSS. In the 20 patients without the SSS, the SNRT and CSRT were normal in every patient, with a specificity of 100%. The corrected SNRT was less than 450 msec in 19 of 20 patients. The average SNRT was 997 msec, while the average CSRT was 1054 msec (r=0.71, p<0.001). Therefore, the carotid sinus recovery time is a non-invasive estimate of the sinus node recovery time in patients without the SSS.

AB - Electrophysiological studies are often normal in the sick sinus syndrome (SSS). His bundle electrograms (HBE), with right atrial pacing and sinus node recovery times (SNRT) were obtained in 30 patients with the SSS and in 20 patients without the SSS. Carotid sinus pressure was also applied to all patients during the HBE studies. Corrected SNRT, which is the observed SNRT minus the unpaced cycle length, was calculated as well as the corrected carotid sinus recovery time, which is the observed carotid sinus recovery time (SSRT) minus the unpaced cycle length. In the 30 patients with the SSS, the SNRT was greater than 1680 msec in five patients, with a sensitivity of 17%. The CSRT was greater than 2000 msec in 16 patients, with a sensivity of 53%. The corrected SNRT was greater than 450 msec in eight patients, with a sensitivity of 27%. The corrected CSRT was greater than 450 msec in 22 patients, with a sensitivity of 73%. Thus, the corrected CSRT is a major provocative test for the SSS. In the 20 patients without the SSS, the SNRT and CSRT were normal in every patient, with a specificity of 100%. The corrected SNRT was less than 450 msec in 19 of 20 patients. The average SNRT was 997 msec, while the average CSRT was 1054 msec (r=0.71, p<0.001). Therefore, the carotid sinus recovery time is a non-invasive estimate of the sinus node recovery time in patients without the SSS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018147809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018147809&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-0736(78)80126-5

DO - 10.1016/S0022-0736(78)80126-5

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 261

EP - 268

JO - Journal of Electrocardiology

JF - Journal of Electrocardiology

SN - 0022-0736

IS - 3

ER -