Use of temporary names for newborns and associated risks

Jason Adelman, Judy L. Aschner, Clyde B. Schechter, Robert Angert, Jeffrey M. Weiss, Amisha Rai, Matthew Alan Berger, Stan Reissman, Vibin Parakkattue, Bejoy Chacko, Andrew D. Racine, William N. Southern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because there can be no delay in providing identification wristbands to newborns, abstract some hospitals assign newborns temporary first names such as Babyboy or Babygirl. These nondistinct naming conventions result in a large number of patients with similar identifiers in NICUs. To determine the level of risk associated with nondistinct naming conventions, we performed an intervention study to evaluate if assigning distinct first names at birth would result in a reduction in wrong-patient errors. METHODS: We conducted a 2-year before/after implementation study to examine the effect of a distinct naming convention that incorporates the mother's first name into the newborn's first name (eg, Wendysgirl) on the incidence of wrong-patient errors. We used the Retract-and-Reorder (RAR) tool, an established, automated tool for detecting the outcome of wrong-patient electronic orders. The RAR tool identifies orders placed on a patient that are retracted within 10 minutes and then placed by the same clinician on a different patient within the next 10 minutes. RESULTS: The reduction in RAR events post-versus preintervention was 36.3%. After accounting for clusters of orders within order sessions, the odds ratio of an RAR event post-versus preintervention was 0.64 (95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that nondistinct naming conventions are associated with an increased risk of wrong-patient errors and that this risk can be mitigated by changing to a more distinct naming convention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-333
Number of pages7
JournalPediatrics
Volume136
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Names
Newborn Infant
Odds Ratio
Mothers
Parturition
Confidence Intervals
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Use of temporary names for newborns and associated risks. / Adelman, Jason; Aschner, Judy L.; Schechter, Clyde B.; Angert, Robert; Weiss, Jeffrey M.; Rai, Amisha; Berger, Matthew Alan; Reissman, Stan; Parakkattue, Vibin; Chacko, Bejoy; Racine, Andrew D.; Southern, William N.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 136, No. 2, 01.08.2015, p. 327-333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Adelman, J, Aschner, JL, Schechter, CB, Angert, R, Weiss, JM, Rai, A, Berger, MA, Reissman, S, Parakkattue, V, Chacko, B, Racine, AD & Southern, WN 2015, 'Use of temporary names for newborns and associated risks', Pediatrics, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 327-333. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0007
Adelman, Jason ; Aschner, Judy L. ; Schechter, Clyde B. ; Angert, Robert ; Weiss, Jeffrey M. ; Rai, Amisha ; Berger, Matthew Alan ; Reissman, Stan ; Parakkattue, Vibin ; Chacko, Bejoy ; Racine, Andrew D. ; Southern, William N. / Use of temporary names for newborns and associated risks. In: Pediatrics. 2015 ; Vol. 136, No. 2. pp. 327-333.
@article{3eed495b48de4a9fb935a7c20b0d3cb8,
title = "Use of temporary names for newborns and associated risks",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Because there can be no delay in providing identification wristbands to newborns, abstract some hospitals assign newborns temporary first names such as Babyboy or Babygirl. These nondistinct naming conventions result in a large number of patients with similar identifiers in NICUs. To determine the level of risk associated with nondistinct naming conventions, we performed an intervention study to evaluate if assigning distinct first names at birth would result in a reduction in wrong-patient errors. METHODS: We conducted a 2-year before/after implementation study to examine the effect of a distinct naming convention that incorporates the mother's first name into the newborn's first name (eg, Wendysgirl) on the incidence of wrong-patient errors. We used the Retract-and-Reorder (RAR) tool, an established, automated tool for detecting the outcome of wrong-patient electronic orders. The RAR tool identifies orders placed on a patient that are retracted within 10 minutes and then placed by the same clinician on a different patient within the next 10 minutes. RESULTS: The reduction in RAR events post-versus preintervention was 36.3{\%}. After accounting for clusters of orders within order sessions, the odds ratio of an RAR event post-versus preintervention was 0.64 (95{\%} confidence interval: 0.42-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that nondistinct naming conventions are associated with an increased risk of wrong-patient errors and that this risk can be mitigated by changing to a more distinct naming convention.",
author = "Jason Adelman and Aschner, {Judy L.} and Schechter, {Clyde B.} and Robert Angert and Weiss, {Jeffrey M.} and Amisha Rai and Berger, {Matthew Alan} and Stan Reissman and Vibin Parakkattue and Bejoy Chacko and Racine, {Andrew D.} and Southern, {William N.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2015-0007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "327--333",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of temporary names for newborns and associated risks

AU - Adelman, Jason

AU - Aschner, Judy L.

AU - Schechter, Clyde B.

AU - Angert, Robert

AU - Weiss, Jeffrey M.

AU - Rai, Amisha

AU - Berger, Matthew Alan

AU - Reissman, Stan

AU - Parakkattue, Vibin

AU - Chacko, Bejoy

AU - Racine, Andrew D.

AU - Southern, William N.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Because there can be no delay in providing identification wristbands to newborns, abstract some hospitals assign newborns temporary first names such as Babyboy or Babygirl. These nondistinct naming conventions result in a large number of patients with similar identifiers in NICUs. To determine the level of risk associated with nondistinct naming conventions, we performed an intervention study to evaluate if assigning distinct first names at birth would result in a reduction in wrong-patient errors. METHODS: We conducted a 2-year before/after implementation study to examine the effect of a distinct naming convention that incorporates the mother's first name into the newborn's first name (eg, Wendysgirl) on the incidence of wrong-patient errors. We used the Retract-and-Reorder (RAR) tool, an established, automated tool for detecting the outcome of wrong-patient electronic orders. The RAR tool identifies orders placed on a patient that are retracted within 10 minutes and then placed by the same clinician on a different patient within the next 10 minutes. RESULTS: The reduction in RAR events post-versus preintervention was 36.3%. After accounting for clusters of orders within order sessions, the odds ratio of an RAR event post-versus preintervention was 0.64 (95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that nondistinct naming conventions are associated with an increased risk of wrong-patient errors and that this risk can be mitigated by changing to a more distinct naming convention.

AB - BACKGROUND: Because there can be no delay in providing identification wristbands to newborns, abstract some hospitals assign newborns temporary first names such as Babyboy or Babygirl. These nondistinct naming conventions result in a large number of patients with similar identifiers in NICUs. To determine the level of risk associated with nondistinct naming conventions, we performed an intervention study to evaluate if assigning distinct first names at birth would result in a reduction in wrong-patient errors. METHODS: We conducted a 2-year before/after implementation study to examine the effect of a distinct naming convention that incorporates the mother's first name into the newborn's first name (eg, Wendysgirl) on the incidence of wrong-patient errors. We used the Retract-and-Reorder (RAR) tool, an established, automated tool for detecting the outcome of wrong-patient electronic orders. The RAR tool identifies orders placed on a patient that are retracted within 10 minutes and then placed by the same clinician on a different patient within the next 10 minutes. RESULTS: The reduction in RAR events post-versus preintervention was 36.3%. After accounting for clusters of orders within order sessions, the odds ratio of an RAR event post-versus preintervention was 0.64 (95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that nondistinct naming conventions are associated with an increased risk of wrong-patient errors and that this risk can be mitigated by changing to a more distinct naming convention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938869898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938869898&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2015-0007

DO - 10.1542/peds.2015-0007

M3 - Article

C2 - 26169429

AN - SCOPUS:84938869898

VL - 136

SP - 327

EP - 333

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 2

ER -