Urinary obstruction

Pitfalls in the use of delayed contrast material washout for diagnosis

J. H. Newhouse, E. S. Amis, R. C. Pfister

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Delayed washout of contrast material from the renal collecting system has been described as a reliable sign of urinary tract obstruction. However, this finding may appear in the absence of obstruction. Experiments were performed with cylinders containing meglumine iothalamate, which were perfused with water and imaged. The effects of (a) varying flow rate, (b) different volumes of the cylinders, and (c) presence of obstruction on the rate of contrast material washout were observed. In addition, postoperative urography and ureteral perfusion studies in 6 patients who had had ureteropelvic junction obstruction successfully treated by pyeloplasty were reviewed. In the experiments, it was found that changes in flow rate and volume of the reservoir affected contrast material washout; however, the presence of obstruction did not cause a delay in washout. Three of the 6 patients had delayed washout of contrast material on postoperative urographic studies, although ureteral perfusion studies had excluded obstruction. Additional mechanisms that may affect the washout of contrast material are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)319-322
Number of pages4
JournalRadiology
Volume151
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Contrast Media
Iothalamate Meglumine
Perfusion
Urography
Urinary Tract
Kidney
Water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Newhouse, J. H., Amis, E. S., & Pfister, R. C. (1984). Urinary obstruction: Pitfalls in the use of delayed contrast material washout for diagnosis. Radiology, 151(2), 319-322.

Urinary obstruction : Pitfalls in the use of delayed contrast material washout for diagnosis. / Newhouse, J. H.; Amis, E. S.; Pfister, R. C.

In: Radiology, Vol. 151, No. 2, 1984, p. 319-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Newhouse, JH, Amis, ES & Pfister, RC 1984, 'Urinary obstruction: Pitfalls in the use of delayed contrast material washout for diagnosis', Radiology, vol. 151, no. 2, pp. 319-322.
Newhouse, J. H. ; Amis, E. S. ; Pfister, R. C. / Urinary obstruction : Pitfalls in the use of delayed contrast material washout for diagnosis. In: Radiology. 1984 ; Vol. 151, No. 2. pp. 319-322.
@article{05f04f82dcd6422581b2319e9c90e60b,
title = "Urinary obstruction: Pitfalls in the use of delayed contrast material washout for diagnosis",
abstract = "Delayed washout of contrast material from the renal collecting system has been described as a reliable sign of urinary tract obstruction. However, this finding may appear in the absence of obstruction. Experiments were performed with cylinders containing meglumine iothalamate, which were perfused with water and imaged. The effects of (a) varying flow rate, (b) different volumes of the cylinders, and (c) presence of obstruction on the rate of contrast material washout were observed. In addition, postoperative urography and ureteral perfusion studies in 6 patients who had had ureteropelvic junction obstruction successfully treated by pyeloplasty were reviewed. In the experiments, it was found that changes in flow rate and volume of the reservoir affected contrast material washout; however, the presence of obstruction did not cause a delay in washout. Three of the 6 patients had delayed washout of contrast material on postoperative urographic studies, although ureteral perfusion studies had excluded obstruction. Additional mechanisms that may affect the washout of contrast material are discussed.",
author = "Newhouse, {J. H.} and Amis, {E. S.} and Pfister, {R. C.}",
year = "1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "151",
pages = "319--322",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urinary obstruction

T2 - Pitfalls in the use of delayed contrast material washout for diagnosis

AU - Newhouse, J. H.

AU - Amis, E. S.

AU - Pfister, R. C.

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - Delayed washout of contrast material from the renal collecting system has been described as a reliable sign of urinary tract obstruction. However, this finding may appear in the absence of obstruction. Experiments were performed with cylinders containing meglumine iothalamate, which were perfused with water and imaged. The effects of (a) varying flow rate, (b) different volumes of the cylinders, and (c) presence of obstruction on the rate of contrast material washout were observed. In addition, postoperative urography and ureteral perfusion studies in 6 patients who had had ureteropelvic junction obstruction successfully treated by pyeloplasty were reviewed. In the experiments, it was found that changes in flow rate and volume of the reservoir affected contrast material washout; however, the presence of obstruction did not cause a delay in washout. Three of the 6 patients had delayed washout of contrast material on postoperative urographic studies, although ureteral perfusion studies had excluded obstruction. Additional mechanisms that may affect the washout of contrast material are discussed.

AB - Delayed washout of contrast material from the renal collecting system has been described as a reliable sign of urinary tract obstruction. However, this finding may appear in the absence of obstruction. Experiments were performed with cylinders containing meglumine iothalamate, which were perfused with water and imaged. The effects of (a) varying flow rate, (b) different volumes of the cylinders, and (c) presence of obstruction on the rate of contrast material washout were observed. In addition, postoperative urography and ureteral perfusion studies in 6 patients who had had ureteropelvic junction obstruction successfully treated by pyeloplasty were reviewed. In the experiments, it was found that changes in flow rate and volume of the reservoir affected contrast material washout; however, the presence of obstruction did not cause a delay in washout. Three of the 6 patients had delayed washout of contrast material on postoperative urographic studies, although ureteral perfusion studies had excluded obstruction. Additional mechanisms that may affect the washout of contrast material are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021272568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021272568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 151

SP - 319

EP - 322

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -