Unreliable and Difficult-to-Access Food for Those in Need: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Urban Food Pantries

Zoë A. Ginsburg, Alexander D. Bryan, Ellen B. Rubinstein, Hilary J. Frankel, Andrew R. Maroko, Clyde B. Schechter, Kristen Cooksey Stowers, Sean C. Lucan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

For individuals who are food insecure, food pantries can be a vital resource to improve access to adequate food. Access to adequate food may be conceptualized within five dimensions: availability (item variety), accessibility (e.g., hours of operation), accommodation (e.g., cultural sensitivity), affordability (costs, monetary or otherwise), and acceptability (e.g., as related to quality). This study examined the five dimensions of access in a convenience sample of 50 food pantries in the Bronx, NY. The design was cross-sectional. Qualitative data included researcher observations and field notes from unstructured interviews with pantry workers. Quantitative data included frequencies for aspects of food access, organized by the five access dimensions. Inductive analysis of quantitative and qualitative data revealed three main inter-related findings: (1) Pantries were not reliably open: only 50% of pantries were open during hours listed in an online directory (several had had prolonged or indefinite closures); (2) Even when pantries were open, all five access dimensions showed deficiencies (e.g., limited inventory, few hours, pre-selected handouts without consideration of preferences, opportunity costs, and inferior-quality items); (3) Open pantries frequently had insufficient food supply to meet client demand. To deal with mismatch between supply and demand, pantries developed rules for food provision. Rules could break down in cases of pantries receiving food deliveries, leading to workarounds, and in cases of compelling client need, leading to exceptions. Adherence to rules, versus implementation of workarounds and/or exceptions, was worker- and situation-dependent and, thus, unpredictable. Overall, pantry food provision was unreliable. Future research should explore clients’ perception of pantry access considering multiple access dimensions. Future research should also investigate drivers of mismatched supply and demand to create more predictable, reliable, and adequate food provision.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Community Health
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jul 17 2018

Fingerprint

food
Food
demand
hours of operation
supply
worker
Costs and Cost Analysis
Directories
Food Supply
food supply
opportunity costs
mismatch
accommodation
driver
Research Personnel
Interviews
Equipment and Supplies
costs
interview
resources

Keywords

  • Community nutrition
  • Food environment
  • Food insecurity
  • Food pantries
  • Urban

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Unreliable and Difficult-to-Access Food for Those in Need : A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Urban Food Pantries. / Ginsburg, Zoë A.; Bryan, Alexander D.; Rubinstein, Ellen B.; Frankel, Hilary J.; Maroko, Andrew R.; Schechter, Clyde B.; Cooksey Stowers, Kristen; Lucan, Sean C.

In: Journal of Community Health, 17.07.2018, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ginsburg, Zoë A. ; Bryan, Alexander D. ; Rubinstein, Ellen B. ; Frankel, Hilary J. ; Maroko, Andrew R. ; Schechter, Clyde B. ; Cooksey Stowers, Kristen ; Lucan, Sean C. / Unreliable and Difficult-to-Access Food for Those in Need : A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Urban Food Pantries. In: Journal of Community Health. 2018 ; pp. 1-16.
@article{46311e0e29ac4eafbe21fb53512fa6d8,
title = "Unreliable and Difficult-to-Access Food for Those in Need: A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Urban Food Pantries",
abstract = "For individuals who are food insecure, food pantries can be a vital resource to improve access to adequate food. Access to adequate food may be conceptualized within five dimensions: availability (item variety), accessibility (e.g., hours of operation), accommodation (e.g., cultural sensitivity), affordability (costs, monetary or otherwise), and acceptability (e.g., as related to quality). This study examined the five dimensions of access in a convenience sample of 50 food pantries in the Bronx, NY. The design was cross-sectional. Qualitative data included researcher observations and field notes from unstructured interviews with pantry workers. Quantitative data included frequencies for aspects of food access, organized by the five access dimensions. Inductive analysis of quantitative and qualitative data revealed three main inter-related findings: (1) Pantries were not reliably open: only 50{\%} of pantries were open during hours listed in an online directory (several had had prolonged or indefinite closures); (2) Even when pantries were open, all five access dimensions showed deficiencies (e.g., limited inventory, few hours, pre-selected handouts without consideration of preferences, opportunity costs, and inferior-quality items); (3) Open pantries frequently had insufficient food supply to meet client demand. To deal with mismatch between supply and demand, pantries developed rules for food provision. Rules could break down in cases of pantries receiving food deliveries, leading to workarounds, and in cases of compelling client need, leading to exceptions. Adherence to rules, versus implementation of workarounds and/or exceptions, was worker- and situation-dependent and, thus, unpredictable. Overall, pantry food provision was unreliable. Future research should explore clients’ perception of pantry access considering multiple access dimensions. Future research should also investigate drivers of mismatched supply and demand to create more predictable, reliable, and adequate food provision.",
keywords = "Community nutrition, Food environment, Food insecurity, Food pantries, Urban",
author = "Ginsburg, {Zo{\"e} A.} and Bryan, {Alexander D.} and Rubinstein, {Ellen B.} and Frankel, {Hilary J.} and Maroko, {Andrew R.} and Schechter, {Clyde B.} and {Cooksey Stowers}, Kristen and Lucan, {Sean C.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1007/s10900-018-0549-2",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Journal of Community Health",
issn = "0094-5145",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unreliable and Difficult-to-Access Food for Those in Need

T2 - A Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Urban Food Pantries

AU - Ginsburg, Zoë A.

AU - Bryan, Alexander D.

AU - Rubinstein, Ellen B.

AU - Frankel, Hilary J.

AU - Maroko, Andrew R.

AU - Schechter, Clyde B.

AU - Cooksey Stowers, Kristen

AU - Lucan, Sean C.

PY - 2018/7/17

Y1 - 2018/7/17

N2 - For individuals who are food insecure, food pantries can be a vital resource to improve access to adequate food. Access to adequate food may be conceptualized within five dimensions: availability (item variety), accessibility (e.g., hours of operation), accommodation (e.g., cultural sensitivity), affordability (costs, monetary or otherwise), and acceptability (e.g., as related to quality). This study examined the five dimensions of access in a convenience sample of 50 food pantries in the Bronx, NY. The design was cross-sectional. Qualitative data included researcher observations and field notes from unstructured interviews with pantry workers. Quantitative data included frequencies for aspects of food access, organized by the five access dimensions. Inductive analysis of quantitative and qualitative data revealed three main inter-related findings: (1) Pantries were not reliably open: only 50% of pantries were open during hours listed in an online directory (several had had prolonged or indefinite closures); (2) Even when pantries were open, all five access dimensions showed deficiencies (e.g., limited inventory, few hours, pre-selected handouts without consideration of preferences, opportunity costs, and inferior-quality items); (3) Open pantries frequently had insufficient food supply to meet client demand. To deal with mismatch between supply and demand, pantries developed rules for food provision. Rules could break down in cases of pantries receiving food deliveries, leading to workarounds, and in cases of compelling client need, leading to exceptions. Adherence to rules, versus implementation of workarounds and/or exceptions, was worker- and situation-dependent and, thus, unpredictable. Overall, pantry food provision was unreliable. Future research should explore clients’ perception of pantry access considering multiple access dimensions. Future research should also investigate drivers of mismatched supply and demand to create more predictable, reliable, and adequate food provision.

AB - For individuals who are food insecure, food pantries can be a vital resource to improve access to adequate food. Access to adequate food may be conceptualized within five dimensions: availability (item variety), accessibility (e.g., hours of operation), accommodation (e.g., cultural sensitivity), affordability (costs, monetary or otherwise), and acceptability (e.g., as related to quality). This study examined the five dimensions of access in a convenience sample of 50 food pantries in the Bronx, NY. The design was cross-sectional. Qualitative data included researcher observations and field notes from unstructured interviews with pantry workers. Quantitative data included frequencies for aspects of food access, organized by the five access dimensions. Inductive analysis of quantitative and qualitative data revealed three main inter-related findings: (1) Pantries were not reliably open: only 50% of pantries were open during hours listed in an online directory (several had had prolonged or indefinite closures); (2) Even when pantries were open, all five access dimensions showed deficiencies (e.g., limited inventory, few hours, pre-selected handouts without consideration of preferences, opportunity costs, and inferior-quality items); (3) Open pantries frequently had insufficient food supply to meet client demand. To deal with mismatch between supply and demand, pantries developed rules for food provision. Rules could break down in cases of pantries receiving food deliveries, leading to workarounds, and in cases of compelling client need, leading to exceptions. Adherence to rules, versus implementation of workarounds and/or exceptions, was worker- and situation-dependent and, thus, unpredictable. Overall, pantry food provision was unreliable. Future research should explore clients’ perception of pantry access considering multiple access dimensions. Future research should also investigate drivers of mismatched supply and demand to create more predictable, reliable, and adequate food provision.

KW - Community nutrition

KW - Food environment

KW - Food insecurity

KW - Food pantries

KW - Urban

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049931946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049931946&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10900-018-0549-2

DO - 10.1007/s10900-018-0549-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 30019196

AN - SCOPUS:85049931946

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Journal of Community Health

JF - Journal of Community Health

SN - 0094-5145

ER -