Truncating the dose range for methacholine challenge tests

Three occupational studies

Ilir Agalliu, Ellen A. Eisen, Russ Hauser, Carrie A. Redlich, Meredith H. Stowe, Mark R. Cullen, David H. Wegman, David C. Christiani, Susan M. Kennedy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The methacholine challenge test protocol was assessed in the reanalysis of three occupational studies. We evaluated the impact of truncating the range of methacholine on responsiveness, as defined by slope and PC20. In original analysis, reactivity was similar for apprentices and auto body shop workers, whereas boilermakers were more responsive. Truncating high concentrations did not change the classification of subjects with PC20 < 8 or 16 in any population. However, when responsiveness was measured by slope, the mean responsiveness increased, from -7.9 to -15.3 for apprentices and -7.2 to -10.0 for auto-body shop workers. Results support the American Thoracic Society's recommended maximum of 16 mg/mL and provide evidence that extending the dose range beyond that does not increase sensitivity, whereas stopping before 16 may exaggerate response. Furthermore, to ensure validity, neither slope nor PC20 should be extrapolated beyond data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)841-847
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Volume45
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Methacholine Chloride
Thorax
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Truncating the dose range for methacholine challenge tests : Three occupational studies. / Agalliu, Ilir; Eisen, Ellen A.; Hauser, Russ; Redlich, Carrie A.; Stowe, Meredith H.; Cullen, Mark R.; Wegman, David H.; Christiani, David C.; Kennedy, Susan M.

In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 8, 01.08.2003, p. 841-847.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Agalliu, I, Eisen, EA, Hauser, R, Redlich, CA, Stowe, MH, Cullen, MR, Wegman, DH, Christiani, DC & Kennedy, SM 2003, 'Truncating the dose range for methacholine challenge tests: Three occupational studies', Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 841-847. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000083031.56116.53
Agalliu, Ilir ; Eisen, Ellen A. ; Hauser, Russ ; Redlich, Carrie A. ; Stowe, Meredith H. ; Cullen, Mark R. ; Wegman, David H. ; Christiani, David C. ; Kennedy, Susan M. / Truncating the dose range for methacholine challenge tests : Three occupational studies. In: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 45, No. 8. pp. 841-847.
@article{ada910f5e4284780b00bbd5a68bd10ab,
title = "Truncating the dose range for methacholine challenge tests: Three occupational studies",
abstract = "The methacholine challenge test protocol was assessed in the reanalysis of three occupational studies. We evaluated the impact of truncating the range of methacholine on responsiveness, as defined by slope and PC20. In original analysis, reactivity was similar for apprentices and auto body shop workers, whereas boilermakers were more responsive. Truncating high concentrations did not change the classification of subjects with PC20 < 8 or 16 in any population. However, when responsiveness was measured by slope, the mean responsiveness increased, from -7.9 to -15.3 for apprentices and -7.2 to -10.0 for auto-body shop workers. Results support the American Thoracic Society's recommended maximum of 16 mg/mL and provide evidence that extending the dose range beyond that does not increase sensitivity, whereas stopping before 16 may exaggerate response. Furthermore, to ensure validity, neither slope nor PC20 should be extrapolated beyond data.",
author = "Ilir Agalliu and Eisen, {Ellen A.} and Russ Hauser and Redlich, {Carrie A.} and Stowe, {Meredith H.} and Cullen, {Mark R.} and Wegman, {David H.} and Christiani, {David C.} and Kennedy, {Susan M.}",
year = "2003",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.jom.0000083031.56116.53",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "841--847",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine",
issn = "1076-2752",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Truncating the dose range for methacholine challenge tests

T2 - Three occupational studies

AU - Agalliu, Ilir

AU - Eisen, Ellen A.

AU - Hauser, Russ

AU - Redlich, Carrie A.

AU - Stowe, Meredith H.

AU - Cullen, Mark R.

AU - Wegman, David H.

AU - Christiani, David C.

AU - Kennedy, Susan M.

PY - 2003/8/1

Y1 - 2003/8/1

N2 - The methacholine challenge test protocol was assessed in the reanalysis of three occupational studies. We evaluated the impact of truncating the range of methacholine on responsiveness, as defined by slope and PC20. In original analysis, reactivity was similar for apprentices and auto body shop workers, whereas boilermakers were more responsive. Truncating high concentrations did not change the classification of subjects with PC20 < 8 or 16 in any population. However, when responsiveness was measured by slope, the mean responsiveness increased, from -7.9 to -15.3 for apprentices and -7.2 to -10.0 for auto-body shop workers. Results support the American Thoracic Society's recommended maximum of 16 mg/mL and provide evidence that extending the dose range beyond that does not increase sensitivity, whereas stopping before 16 may exaggerate response. Furthermore, to ensure validity, neither slope nor PC20 should be extrapolated beyond data.

AB - The methacholine challenge test protocol was assessed in the reanalysis of three occupational studies. We evaluated the impact of truncating the range of methacholine on responsiveness, as defined by slope and PC20. In original analysis, reactivity was similar for apprentices and auto body shop workers, whereas boilermakers were more responsive. Truncating high concentrations did not change the classification of subjects with PC20 < 8 or 16 in any population. However, when responsiveness was measured by slope, the mean responsiveness increased, from -7.9 to -15.3 for apprentices and -7.2 to -10.0 for auto-body shop workers. Results support the American Thoracic Society's recommended maximum of 16 mg/mL and provide evidence that extending the dose range beyond that does not increase sensitivity, whereas stopping before 16 may exaggerate response. Furthermore, to ensure validity, neither slope nor PC20 should be extrapolated beyond data.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0042161620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0042161620&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.jom.0000083031.56116.53

DO - 10.1097/01.jom.0000083031.56116.53

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 841

EP - 847

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

SN - 1076-2752

IS - 8

ER -